EB66

22 ms·

181.
by EB66 8y ago
Interesting the see that the BGP WGs take such a different approach. Both DNS and BGP fill a similar essential role, you'd think that they would develop new standards in a similar fashion.
182.
by EB66 8y ago
> These guidelines suggest grouping the CSS and HTML and JS together when they are related. It makes a lot of sense in larger applications. I absolutely agree with you on that. It's important to point out that grouping and intertwin
183.
by EB66 8y ago
I'm not arguing that our framework is better than React or Vue -- our framework just works better for us. We do plan to eventually open source it, but there's a lot of work to be done before a public release: better documentation,
184.
by EB66 8y ago
I agree with PretzelFisch. It's not necessary to delve into framework minutia and ALL possible use cases in order to get a feel for how the frameworks operate. The OP made a very wise decision by choosing to build a demo app that incor
185.
by EB66 8y ago
> > Seeing those quasi-JS expressions in HTML attributes is enough to put me off Vue. > They are supremely useful. Ultimately, it's knowing how to use them to their maximum potential. Supremely useful for a typical full stack
186.
by EB66 8y ago
FWIW, a few of the non-jQuery alternatives documented on http://youmightnotneedjquery.com are not equivalent -- they lack some of the functionality that jQuery offers. For example, take a look at $.replaceWith(). If you use $.re
187.
by EB66 8y ago
I agree with this sentiment wholeheartedly. A lot of the commenters here have a very old school view of jQuery. They seem to believe that if you're using jQuery, then you must also be employing manual DOM manipulations, manual state ma
188.
by EB66 8y ago
It sounds like you're saying using jQuery and a modern component-ized front-end framework are mutually exclusive. jQuery and modern front-end components can go together very easily -- albeit not specifically with React and Vue. Our com
189.
by EB66 8y ago
> Wouldnt it make more sense to build this as a cloud service? Definitely. Maritime companies and backcountry users probably won't be interested in messing around with a nifty open source tool nor the hosting infrastructure it'
190.
by EB66 8y ago
I think your niche might be companies or professionals that need to communicate via satellite while 'out in the field'. For my job I need to take an Inmarsat BGAN terminal with me on trips into the backcountry so I can pull up a d
191.
Show HN: Observe changes on nested objects in JavaScript(github.com)
7 points by EB66 8y ago|0 comments