DrammBA

5 ms·

61.
Anthropic legal request: OpenCode removes Claude subscription support(github.com)
6 points by DrammBA 7mo ago|1 comments
62.
by DrammBA 7mo ago
opencode-anthropic-auth archived: https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode-anthropic-auth anthropic legal demanded this pull request be closed: https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode-anthropic-auth&#x2
63.
by DrammBA 7mo ago
> are you likely to place the blame on OpenCode? am I ? Probably, but I get your point that your average user would blame Anthropic instead. > even if total token limits are the same, less caching means higher costs Not really, flat-
64.
by DrammBA 7mo ago
But wouldn't a less efficient tool simply consume your 5-hour/weekly quota faster? There's gotta be something else, probably telemetry, maybe hoping people switch to API without fighting, or simply vendor lock-in.
65.
by DrammBA 7mo ago
Terminal scrolling opens a big can of worms for them, I doubt they'll ever implement it. The best you can do is enable scrollbars in opencode so you can quickly jump places.
66.
by DrammBA 7mo ago
Still waiting for the "Open" in OpenAI to become more than branding.
67.
by DrammBA 8mo ago
Wasn't that introduced in Windows 7?
68.
by DrammBA 8mo ago
Sadly the fast startup time is overshadowed by the slow response time of the codex agent
69.
by DrammBA 9mo ago
Do you have any source for that claim? I'm curious and worried.
70.
by DrammBA 9mo ago
You focused on writing software, but the real problem is the spec used to produce the software, LLMs will happily hallucinate reasonable but unintended specs, and the checker won’t save you because after all the software created is correct
71.
by DrammBA 9mo ago
Are the nightly releases the expected way to get timely bugfixes?
72.
by DrammBA 9mo ago
Without getting into your specific injury or sport, what was the biggest change compared to the trainer’s program? Was it something unexpected like "exercise this seemingly unrelated muscle group that has nothing do with your injury bu
73.
by DrammBA 9mo ago
You mean "after" making the comment? Your offensive comment makes no sense if you already had the universal build context
74.
by DrammBA 9mo ago
Funny thing I went down a rabbit hole, cause I first scanned the open PRs and saw a PR to enable universal builds to support intel macs but the whole thing was pure AI slop and someone commented that codexbar already supports intel, and sur
75.
by DrammBA 9mo ago
I loved the screenshot section of the readme followed by zero screenshots.
76.
by DrammBA 9mo ago
> Today at CES, Intel unveiled Intel Core Ultra Series 3 processors, the first AI PC platform built on Intel 18A process technology that was designed and manufactured in the United States. Powering over 200 designs from leading, global p
77.
by DrammBA 9mo ago
> completely free, and there is no advertising or hidden gotchas I don't understand why not release the source if the app is completely free, what are you trying to protect?
78.
by DrammBA 9mo ago
> That depends on how you interpret "static render". It only depends if you interpret it incorrectly.
79.
by DrammBA 9mo ago
You seem to be confused about your terms, both SSR and SSG can rehydrate and become interactive, you only need SSR if you have personalized content that must be fetched on an actual user request, and with frameworks like astro introducing i
80.
by DrammBA 9mo ago
Simon, you're starting to sound super disconnected from reality, this "I hit everything that looks like a nail with my LLM hammer" vibe is new.
81.
by DrammBA 9mo ago
> I don't know if I'd call it breakage to just... not use them where they should be used. Accessibility only has 2 states: "Working" and "Broken", there's no third "I didn't bother".
82.
by DrammBA 9mo ago
> It's not X - it's Y, it's Z. > Consider: consideration. That's what you should consider. Come on man
83.
by DrammBA 9mo ago
To be fair our conversation can be summarized as: > only pedants misunderstand this, here's a 2 decade old source that doesn't support my claim, I rather not continue the conversation so it was never meant to be productive
84.
by DrammBA 9mo ago
> I have not seen that usage for less than 100%. So 600% conforms; 50% does not. > For some evidence to support my claim Please note that the 2008 discussion you linked does not support your claim in any way, so 50% does conform.
85.
by DrammBA 9mo ago
> It conforms to no common usage that I am aware of. It conforms to: > “cut prices by 600%” is understood perfectly well by most people (but not pedants) to mean “we undid price hikes of 600%.” which I agree is no common usage that I
86.
by DrammBA 9mo ago
You ignored the 2nd part of their message, imagine this: > We cut prices by 50%! Before $30, now $20 Would it be pedantic to call that price cut bullshit?
87.
by DrammBA 9mo ago
For reference, cosidering the backup has 86 million music files, at an average of 3 minutes per file it would take you around 490 years to listen to all the tracks.
88.
by DrammBA 10mo ago
> It’s less than $2 a month for 2TB. What would be the egress fee to get your data back in case of disaster?
89.
by DrammBA 10mo ago
> on this rare occasion couldn't resist the joke It was unintentional as per author > Ouch. That is what I get for pushing something out during a meeting, I guess. That was not my point; the experiment is done, and it was a succe
90.
by DrammBA 10mo ago
> Edit: It's easy to downvote. I cited the relevant law. If I'm wrong, cite other law that explains why. > Please don't comment about the voting on comments. It never does any good, and it makes boring reading. https:&

More ›