Draiken

6 ms·

31.
by Draiken 8mo ago
Take Claude Code itself. It's got access to an endless amount of tokens and many (hopefully smart) engineers working on it and they can't build a fucking TUI with it. So, my answer would be no. Tech debt shows up even if every sin
32.
by Draiken 9mo ago
Come on... it's always the same reason: money. Companies don't support Linux because it's not widespread enough so it can't outweigh the costs. They don't give a rat's ass for the market's resentfulness or
33.
by Draiken 9mo ago
Most game studios pay someone else to make the anti-cheats and many already have Linux versions that the studios choose to not enable. Besides, if your anti-cheat only ever looks at the system level, it'll easily be bypassed by hardwar
34.
by Draiken 9mo ago
Of course running one system is better. Use Linux and stop being miserable ;) Still, you haven't said what are these extremely horrible cons that two systems have. For me they're so small it's not even comparable to having to
35.
by Draiken 9mo ago
Looking forward for those 10x improvements to finally show up somewhere. Any day now! Jokes aside, I never said it's not useful, but most definitely it's not even close to all this hype.
36.
by Draiken 9mo ago
If it ever gets there, then anyone can use it and there's no "skill" to be learned at all. Either it will continue to be this very flawed non-deterministic tool that requires a lot of effort to get useful code out of it, or i
37.
by Draiken 9mo ago
Which are? I've had Windows in one disk and Linux in another for maybe a decade and use the boot selection to pick what I want. Never had a single issue. Although I haven't opened Windows in months, so I'll likely nuke it soo
38.
by Draiken 9mo ago
> That's why some developers choose not to enable it That's an excuse. It's mostly incompetence or more often than not the company doesn't think it's worth the effort. With more Linux users, the balance will even
39.
by Draiken 9mo ago
Still has an anti-cheat, they just bothered to allow Linux support. Companies don't do this out of laziness/incompetence, but even some large anti-cheats work on Linux and some games simply choose to not enable it (cough, Tarkov,
40.
by Draiken 9mo ago
> Is it not reproducable? Someone up thread reproduced it and expanded on it. It worked for me the first time I prompted. Did you try it or are you just guessing that it's not reproducable because that's what you already think?
41.
by Draiken 9mo ago
Yet this is not reproducible. This is the whole issue with LLMs: they are random. You cannot trust that it'll do a good job on all reports so you'll have to manually review the LLMs reports anyways or hope that real issues didn&#x
42.
by Draiken 9mo ago
> but it also increases the quality of the higher-tier I truly don't see this happening anymore. Maybe it did before? If there's real competition, maybe this does happen. We don't have it and it'll never last in capi
43.
by Draiken 9mo ago
I agree with the parent because what you're describing doesn't indirectly motivate people, it merely avoids demotivation. If the person doesn't feel motivated by themselves (e.g. someone burned out or who does not care) they
44.
by Draiken 9mo ago
LLMs give you that dopamine hit without the effort. I did it! Except you didn't and you don't know anything about what it did or learned anything along the way. Success?
45.
by Draiken 9mo ago
I use Ansible. It's simple enough and I had some prior experience with it, so I merely have some variables, roles that render a docker-compose.yml.j2 template and boom. It all works, I have easy access to secrets, shared variables amon
46.
by Draiken 9mo ago
This summarizes what LLMs are best at: hobby projects that you care mostly about the outcome and won't have to actively maintain forever. When using them with production code they are a liability more than a resource.
47.
by Draiken 9mo ago
Write scripts for everything. If you need to run the command once, you can now run it again in the future. It's very tempting to just paste some commands (or ask AI to do it) but writing simple scripts like this is an amazing solution
48.
by Draiken 9mo ago
> ASML's secret sauce is not that secret or uncopyable. You must've watched a different video. They took a decade to get there and they're happy to show all the how-to's because they know the devil is in the details.
49.
by Draiken 9mo ago
Which is better because? We can't copy/paste a new ASML no matter how hard you try (aside from open sourcing all of their IPs). Even if you do, by the time you copy one generation of machine, they're on a new generation and y
50.
by Draiken 9mo ago
And you learned nothing and have no clue if what it spit out is good or not. How can you even assume what it did is "better" if you have no knowledge of kubernetes in the first place? It's mere hope. Sure it gets you somewhe
51.
by Draiken 9mo ago
Funnily enough, I didn't know about opencode and will now test it out and likely use it instead. Improve your client so people prefer it? Nah. Try to force people to use your client by subsidizing it? Now that's what I'm talk
52.
by Draiken 9mo ago
> CC isn't just the TUI tool. It's also the LLM behind it. No, Claude Code is literally the TUI tool. The LLMs behind are the models. You can use different models within the same TUI tool, even CC allows that, regardless of the
53.
by Draiken 9mo ago
Putting all your eggs in one basket is one big reason. As a developer if, let's say, AI does make my profession no longer a viable option monetarily, what would happen if my entire identity is tied to it? You cannot fully control your
54.
by Draiken 9mo ago
I guess we can't win, can we? I worried more about random developers getting compromised since the surface area is much larger, but at the same time one entity compiling all packages makes them a more attractive target. We've seen
55.
by Draiken 9mo ago
TIL! IDK if I would consider not blindly trusting an unknown third party to read all my notifications being paranoid, but if it is, then yeah, I guess I am. I've used F-droid merely due to the open source guarantee, so how fast these a
56.
by Draiken 9mo ago
TIL! What a find. Thanks mate! I might actually try this now.
57.
by Draiken 9mo ago
I would love to use this, but I don't want to allow a third party app with closed source to read all my notifications. This can read OTP passwords, full messages, etc. so it must be open source for me to consider it. I would donate&#x2
58.
by Draiken 10mo ago
You mean like Google/Apple/Meta already are? I don't see how we're not already there. There's no competition, only an oligopoly splitting their spoils.
59.
by Draiken 10mo ago
I think Occam's razor explains this: the majority of people are incompetent. People get to positions of power through many means and very few of those are related to competence. Be it nepotism, boot licking, friendship, inheritance, pe
60.
by Draiken 10mo ago
A bad system is still bad even if something else is worse. > That system allocated resources to various monopolies who were too big to fail. Like our banks today? Like OpenAI is trying to sell themselves as so the US government bails the

More ›