DominikR

31 ms·

241.
by DominikR 10y ago
It is different because this behaviour fits a well know pattern of a certain type of criminal. The child molester. There is no such established pattern where we can reasonably assume that a company collecting SSIDs will usually do this to a
242.
by DominikR 10y ago
His argument was that you can reasonably expect people to know how to handle such technologies safely, not that he expects people to know how to build a WiFi Router from electronic parts themselves. Using your analogy it would be sufficient
243.
by DominikR 10y ago
Has Yahoo acted grossly negligent? (I don't know the specifics in this case) If so then they are liable for resulting damages, if not then they didn't screw up. See, no customer is entitled to a 100% guarantee that their private d
244.
by DominikR 10y ago
I read that, don't you see the difference between this and setting up camps to exterminate people? It states right there that the deaths were results of gross negligence and mismanagement and the Boers attacking the British supply line
245.
by DominikR 10y ago
Look, throughout history countries took prisoners during wars, so did Britain and others, and many suffered because of that. But to compare this to concentration camps that were literally built to exterminate whole people isn't even fu
246.
by DominikR 10y ago
Oh, so these Trump supporters are creating deranged art, therefore they are equally deranged themselves? What is your proposal on how to deal with them? Burn their books and art publicly?
247.
by DominikR 10y ago
Palmer Luckey supporting one candidate is not the problem, the leftist media that seeks to financially, politically and even socially destroy and ostracise anyone not supporting their candidate is the problem. How can anyone support that? Y
248.
by DominikR 10y ago
You did not answer my question. Is punishment deterring people from committing crimes? Yes or no? If you say no then we need no punishment and we can make every crime legal. There are several possibilities as to why capital punishment may n
249.
by DominikR 10y ago
A radical Islamist yesterday attacked and wounded 8 or 9 people with a knife in a mall before he was shot dead by an off duty cop. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/19/us/police-shoot-attacker-i...
250.
by DominikR 10y ago
Capital punishment isn't only retributive in character, it is also deterrence. If you are then going to argue that it doesn't actually deter then why not do away with all punishments for crimes?
251.
by DominikR 10y ago
> If justice requires a life for a life, you don't scrimp on that, either. You pay whatever monetary, emotional, and moral costs are necessary for justice to be done. How exactly do you reach this conclusion, I mean what underlying
252.
by DominikR 10y ago
> Also, you're a consultant. You obviously have an understanding of client relationships. Understand that your clients in SF are going to skew younger. One of my best friends was the CTO of a startup where the founder was 20. He was
253.
by DominikR 10y ago
Yes I did, I'm terribly sorry, I'm wrong here.
254.
by DominikR 10y ago
-
255.
by DominikR 10y ago
Edit: Intercept is not British, my bad.
256.
by DominikR 10y ago
The list of "bad stuff" in the article is longer than the list of "good stuff", yet it receives a 9/10. Looks strange (biased) to me, yet I'm not an Apple hater, in fact I've ordered an iPhone 7 Plus for m
257.
by DominikR 10y ago
To be honest the only difference that I see is that the Microsoft Pix images seem to be brighter and with less contrast. Maybe this is an amazing app full of amazing technology but the sample images that should advertise this were picked ba
258.
by DominikR 10y ago
There is no definitive proof for US contingency plans but the US is so heavily involved with Pakistan to secure these nuclear weapons and on top of that there have been so many statements of top US officials (even from US Presidents) regard
259.
by DominikR 10y ago
There will be no strike at anyones achilles heel, at least not if we are talking about mayor world powers like the US, Russia and China. The most any one of these powers will do (and all of them do it) is trying to subvert and destroy weak
260.
by DominikR 10y ago
It is one thing what I personally dislike (for example what happened in Romania) and what I'm vocal against (Communism, Socialism) and what my country is responsible to fight for. (especially if the adversary was the Soviet Union) You
261.
by DominikR 10y ago
I'm not in any brotherhood, I'm not a missionary and I'm not waging some kind of Jihad to spread my ideology in the world. You seem to not recognise that freedom cannot be obtained without self responsibility as you are const
262.
by DominikR 10y ago
No, no one "left" someone under occupation, it wasn't the decision to make for the West in the first place. The responsibility for the US is primarily for what happens in the US, the same is true for the UK and Romania. Roman
263.
by DominikR 10y ago
Why should someone not get the current value for his property just because he is rich? How exactly is it the rich persons responsibility for what happened to Romania in the last decades? It wasn't the rich person from Sweden that force
264.
by DominikR 10y ago
> if you want to talk compensation, talk about how the whole western Europe left the eastern Europe to rot as slaves for generations. You've got that wrong, western European countries have no responsibility to do anything for easter
265.
by DominikR 10y ago
When you want to have someones property it is not unfair to ask for its _current_ value. The Swedes might have bought the property for $28 million back then, but who says that it isn't worth today $800 million or $120 million? The mark
266.
by DominikR 10y ago
Actually yes, these things and many beyond that are knowable, yet you don't know them. Therefore you only have a sense for a subset of reality, just as you can't see the whole spectrum of light or hear every sound. But this extrem
267.
by DominikR 10y ago
For me both are to blame for the murder about equally. I believe that in most Western countries the punishment for the mercenary (btw it's an assassin, mercenaries can do legitimate work like providing security in war zones) would be s
268.
by DominikR 10y ago
I do not view a persons action in complete isolation, that's not what I said. I just say it is a different thing if you kill a Rhino yourself (or order someone to kill one for you) than walking down a market in Hong Kong, seeing some R
269.
by DominikR 10y ago
> If you buy an illegaly obtained human heart, are you not culpable for the death of the former owner? Not if you do not know that the person has been killed for you to receive the heart or even worse, you ordered someone directly to kil
270.
by DominikR 10y ago
I honestly can't come up with a single example where someone should be held accountable for something someone else did except for cases that involve enabling others who suffer for some kind of psychological illness or are otherwise inc

More ›