Dlemlo

5 ms·

31.
by Dlemlo 28d ago
And? Is this an apple fanboy club and critisism is not allowed or you don't think this critisim is valid because of your strawman argument?
32.
by Dlemlo 28d ago
You do understand that this was headlines for years? Did you complelty ignore that? It only got 'fixed' 2023 and insulin still costs $30-50 per month for something you need to live.
33.
by Dlemlo 28d ago
Thats not the point. There is a difference between someone spending a lot of money on compute and never use it vs. doing the same thing. Its like buying a porsch and driving it always at 100km only.
34.
by Dlemlo 28d ago
And? Why do you even the comment on a social critisism comment? Just ignore it, feel happy when you buy yourself the next stupid thing while you feel offended seeing your fellow citicen. Why does it even trigger you then?
35.
by Dlemlo 28d ago
The social critisism is, that people in the united states of america (were apple is home), let people die while also buying unironically $800 watches as a mass consumer product.
36.
by Dlemlo 28d ago
I'm referencing us american people who were unable to afford insulin due to us americans shitty healtcaresystem. Search for Alec Smith in Minnesota. Its social critic, you did not get that? A country which let their own people die but
37.
by Dlemlo 28d ago
We can have real arguments, but lets be clear, comparing a $800 dollar watch you use for lisening to music and paying is not the thing to compare to something you actually need to live.
38.
by Dlemlo 28d ago
Minnesota in 2017, when you search for Alec Smith.
39.
by Dlemlo 28d ago
This is not a consumer product but a homage to craftmanship and clearly a luxury product. Apple is a mass produced product under shitty work conditions.
40.
by Dlemlo 28d ago
$800 for a watch. Man we lost it as a society. Others are not able to eat, die because of insulin prices, struggle every day and we sit here on HN and people are thinking about buying the next gadget. A watch for $800...
41.
by Dlemlo 28d ago
Its brutally expensive and probably doesn't fit in a pocket well. Do you expect hn being an uncritical apple fanclub?
42.
by Dlemlo 28d ago
Its a 2200$ device which does the same thing as a 500$ tablet or any other option. If people would at least use the power they buy... :|
43.
by Dlemlo 28d ago
Yeah capitalism. If the AI transofmration takes too long, we might never overthrow capitalism
44.
by Dlemlo 28d ago
Doing 3D Modeling was not cheap and not niche. And we have not seen what the industry will put out on a hardware level. Optical computing is coming, onchip models too.
45.
by Dlemlo 28d ago
If you look at certain documentations, we lost already how we d othings. USA forgot how to produce things. This will not prevent us from doing it.
46.
by Dlemlo 28d ago
Yeah to a certain degree me too tbh. But the biggest growth from the last 20-30 years was digital. It allowed a lot of people around the planet to change things.
47.
by Dlemlo 28d ago
what i tried to ask you is, what you mean by this. "“what if we (Anthropic) are wrong about the value of AI”." What is the point you are trying to make which goes in this direction? Like is making AI jobs so cheap that the economy
48.
by Dlemlo 28d ago
The biggest critisism from my side is not how AI will take over jobs but I believe we will see peak of certain things. Creating images (menues, flyers, whatever) became so cheap, that we reached peak graphi design GDP generation. This will
49.
by Dlemlo 28d ago
Based on the current quality of AI/LLMs, this a very weird take tbh? What are your points? The value of AI is real and AI already is responsible for people getting fired or no additional jobs. Ask basic graphics designers, website deve
50.
by Dlemlo 28d ago
How? Whatever an LLM can do today, will not come back as is tomorrow. The biggest issue the LLM today: It kills all the small and niche things. The things were we fit all the other people is getting destroyed. You know the guy who makes web
51.
by Dlemlo 28d ago
I think we have a real problem because we know what we still need to build and as soon as it is build, it will work. Software development for example is enhanced with running your claude locally. But lets be honest, the right way to adjust
52.
by Dlemlo 29d ago
Yeah why not? Srsly. Nonethless, a lot of people enjoy stupid movies, others enjoy smart movies etc. If you are not like me and you don't care about the time you spend on a 2h movie because you just want to watch something, you will ha
53.
by Dlemlo 29d ago
Was the material, I was trained, produced in-house? Philosophical questions don't make sense if you use them to counter argue about something which is a legal issue.
54.
by Dlemlo 29d ago
Why not? Isreal created a worm for Siemens controll systems a decade ago. I mean lets hope that there is really really no way from a physical point of view AT ALL that these systems are not accessable but lets be honest, state operated&#x2F
55.
by Dlemlo 29d ago
I meant it only for things which speedup innovation / progress in a particular technology. Like take physical AI / Robotics: 25 years ago you would need to fly to wereever your manufacturing hub was, today you just call.
56.
by Dlemlo 29d ago
I think the view is fair. We have never seen something like this before, we throw the most money we ever had against it in a time were we solved all the other problems: Internet today allows immediadte communication across the planet (it wa
57.
by Dlemlo 29d ago
Very basic idea: A model breaks out by accident, finds some computer system from a military system and triggers some weapon system. Before anyone understands that this happend -> WW4 (WW3 is for me already the Conflict with Russia /
58.
by Dlemlo 29d ago
Your points sound more knee jerk than not. What reason do you have that a AI is dumb? It can do a LOT of things today and is already making real jobs for real humans obsolete. A lot of humans write A lot of different things about AI, includ
59.
by Dlemlo 29d ago
It might also play into this but you can't imagine at all that people are affraid that the current progress is real and fast and its not that absurd that for whatever scifi plot reason, an AI breaks into some gov system and triggers so
60.
by Dlemlo 29d ago
With the amount of energy such a system has available to itstelf and the intelligence it has to control to handle all of this, giving a little bit of energy to its personal zoo on the 3th planet might be a no brainer? Lets hope :D

More ›