Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
DiabloD3
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
31 ms
·
91.
▲
by
DiabloD3
4mo ago
I have been trying to answer this question for years, because I may live long enough to see AI exist. When an AI is a citizen of this country and pays taxes, then I will accept it. This is the only realistic pragmatic answer that doesn'
92.
▲
by
DiabloD3
4mo ago
No. Humanity has yet to create an AI. LLMs are not AI. What you witnessed was an old man with a known and well documented case of dementia lashing out at people who wouldn't help him continue his attempt on strangling America to death
93.
▲
by
DiabloD3
4mo ago
The recommended values for Qwen 3.6 in thinking mode is `--temp 1.0 --top-p 0.95 --top-k 20 --min-p 0.00`, and `--temp 0.6 --top-p 0.95 --top-k 20 --min-p 0.00` for coding/tool calling tasks, and for non-thinking, `--temp 0.7 -top-p 0
94.
▲
by
DiabloD3
4mo ago
AFIAK, it was already being actively exploited in DDoS attacks.
95.
▲
by
DiabloD3
4mo ago
After reading the article, I can conclude that Codex discovered nothing new. This is already something that is known, and if you're able to be targeted by this (which is not the majority of users) configure your httpd differently.
96.
▲
by
DiabloD3
5mo ago
Which llama.cpp now does.
97.
▲
by
DiabloD3
5mo ago
Does Valve just have an internal Russian entity that processes with a domestic payment processor, then? All of the international payment processors (ie, anyone piggybacking off Visanet) are in compliance with the sanctions.
98.
▲
by
DiabloD3
5mo ago
Not anymore they don't. Putin's 3 day special military operation has been going on for 4 year and 3 months, btw.
99.
▲
by
DiabloD3
5mo ago
These people are going to have a really hard time coming to grips with reality in the next few years. AI is DOA, and it's vanishing very rapidly. If you can't participate in a functioning society, fight them.
100.
▲
by
DiabloD3
5mo ago
Vega... unfortunately kinda sucks. Its not amazing at compute (yet is a member of the GCN family, which I have been a fan of since its inception) and ended up being too expensive for perf/$ and perf/watt. The only thing it did was
101.
▲
by
DiabloD3
5mo ago
The correct answer should be "try it!" But as models are starting to pack more information into less bits, some weights are just going to end up becoming super important and very sensitive to quant. So, I'd just move down a Q
102.
▲
by
DiabloD3
5mo ago
This isn't very useful. V of context is not equal across models. Also, huggingface tells you how big the model is for the exact one you have in your hand, why the weird guesswork? Dynamic quants are not going to magically fit some form
103.
▲
by
DiabloD3
5mo ago
These are dynamic quants, and they're basically just an indication of how far away from the desired quant it is allowed to go to achieve the goal. Generally, unsloth's toolchain moves quants up, rarely down. * _0 and _1 do not use
104.
▲
by
DiabloD3
5mo ago
I recommend sticking with the dense models for both Qwen and Gemma. On testing I've done on same-quant apples to apples, with F16/F16 (ie, unquantized) kv cache, 35B-A3B underperforms against 27B on anything even remotely complex.
105.
▲
by
DiabloD3
5mo ago
Because some people on HN mistakenly use AI, and when they do, they're not locally inferring. What fools.
106.
▲
by
DiabloD3
5mo ago
The purpose of a tool is to make your job easier. A good editor makes your job easier. A bad editor makes your job harder. Some people use bad tools because it is what they are familiar with, not because it is a good tool. Example: People d
107.
▲
by
DiabloD3
5mo ago
Anthropic repeatedly refuses to show their work. Is this just a clever application of the harness, so its not inherently LLM at all? Did Anthropic figure out how to take the next step that changes my mind on LLMs? Is this actually just Anth
108.
▲
by
DiabloD3
5mo ago
Technically yes, but this has nothing to do with LLMs. You need to be able to write a good spec period , and this has been true as long as programming has existed. The problem is, LLMs cannot write them themselves , and have trouble reaso
109.
▲
by
DiabloD3
5mo ago
Yes, this is what I keep telling people. There are two kinds of programmers I've met: those who think they became 10x devs because of AI, and those who AI is slowing them down. The people who think they became 10x devs? They were missi
110.
▲
by
DiabloD3
5mo ago
That's called a calculator, we already have those.
111.
▲
by
DiabloD3
5mo ago
This is mostly a performance by the Mistral CEO. He is trying to justify the continued existence of the AI bubble in his country, claiming that, somehow, us Americans have figured it out and made LLMs work. We haven't, nobody has. LLMs
112.
▲
by
DiabloD3
5mo ago
That doesn't actually answer the original poster's commentary, however. Humans have left Twitter, its all propaganda and spam bots just spamming and propagandizing each other. José Valim needs to move to either Bluesky (if he pref
113.
▲
by
DiabloD3
5mo ago
Not surprised. Anthropic dogfoods their own product, and, unfortunately, this is what their product produces sometimes.
114.
▲
by
DiabloD3
5mo ago
Plan 9's Glenda crossed with a Peep?
115.
▲
by
DiabloD3
5mo ago
Unfortunately, there seems to be no proof he actually won the popular vote. Trump has admitted openly that he won due to mass tampering with voting machines, and thanked Elon Musk for his help. Your analogy falls apart.
116.
▲
by
DiabloD3
5mo ago
They don't sell you your OS, that's the big surface area that companies like Dell, HP, Lenovo, etc have to swallow. They also don't make these computers and are at the whim of their ODM, so unless you opt for Coreboot/Li
117.
▲
by
DiabloD3
6mo ago
I love how they just butcher that article. I remember when it came out a little over a year ago, and its just as wrong as it is today as it was then.
118.
▲
by
DiabloD3
6mo ago
This common knowledge is still incorrect. Good news, though, there are a lot of inexpensive good external DACs out there. Over the past decade, an entire industry grew up to fix this problem.
119.
▲
by
DiabloD3
6mo ago
To be fair: You should refer to these as Type-C cables, as they carry things that are not USB protocol. The sole exception should be made for "charge only" cables, which can, and should, be referred to as "wired for USB 2.0&q
120.
▲
by
DiabloD3
6mo ago
I refuse to use Bluetooth, too. But, unfortunately, people keep buying that trash. We're kinda forced to support their mistakes.
More ›