DetroitThrow

39 ms·

511.
by DetroitThrow 6y ago
>Americans have the right to trade with foreign companies Err, foreign affairs (and thus commerce) has always been something regulated by the US government - something reserved for the president unless the legislative explicitly declares
512.
by DetroitThrow 6y ago
>I don't believe you are correct. In the US corporations enjoy "Corporate Personhood", e.g. the corporation itself enjoys many of the same rights as a US person: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate
513.
by DetroitThrow 6y ago
The executive branch's broad authority to regulate foreign commerce has been a constitutional privilege from the beginning - Jefferson strongly advocated for it, for example. Only legislation would disallow this order from going throug
514.
by DetroitThrow 6y ago
It works out great for fairness usually, and works out great for lawyers' salaries almost always!
515.
by DetroitThrow 6y ago
Constitution and constitutional precedent also imbues the powers of foreign affairs onto the president unless there's legislation. Jefferson pushed for this to be the case: "The transaction of business with foreign nations is exec
516.
by DetroitThrow 6y ago
I agree, I don't fully understand why the comparison is being made here. There are plenty of things that are unfair on either side as far as the law goes; Chinese and US businesses have dealt with that for years unimpeded. The more int
517.
by DetroitThrow 6y ago
The issue here is until Congress intervenes, foreign affairs power still is within the executive branches jurisdiction... Which is increasingly tumultuous with Congress flipping underneath the president every cycle it feels like.
518.
by DetroitThrow 6y ago
Well, regardless of being private or public, a foreign owned company having US operations doesn't guarantee it the rights as the US operated equivalent. Foreign commerce is regulated by both the executive and legislative branch - there
519.
by DetroitThrow 6y ago
>Why can't a foreign company participate in the same? Basically foreign owned companies don't have the same constitutional rights as ones owned by US citizens - these companies operations basically being foreign commerce is whe
520.
by DetroitThrow 6y ago
>I strongly hope that your strange "tit-for-tat" doesn't extend to basic rights of people and businesses on US soil. US is supposed to be better than that, remember? I think the issue here is that it's a foreign owned
521.
by DetroitThrow 6y ago
The unique part of Chinese law is the lack of judicial supremacy or "rule of law". The party has supremacy over legal system interpretation as part of the '3 Supremes' order of precedence, with workers also coming ahead
522.
by DetroitThrow 6y ago
DoJ could ask ByteDance for information about TikTok US data security. It's a no brainer to see why DoJ proving this issue would be hard if the laws were stringent, but it doesn't seem like his entity list (if that's what he&
523.
by DetroitThrow 6y ago
>Anyone who suppresses politically incovenient, yet relevant information about minorities, actually doing disservice to them; it is a worst kind of racism and "white privilege", to set arbitrary boundaries what is true and what
524.
by DetroitThrow 6y ago
> There is the problem that everything can be subdivided in a bunch of menial task so every cog in the system isn't aware of their impact. It already happens a lot in software. Precisely the issue with the original proposal. Would i
525.
by DetroitThrow 6y ago
ECT is one of the most effective treatments we have for depression, and TMS certainly promises to allow a procedure that's similarly effective but less invasive/without anesthesia - reducing costs significantly. You can become man
526.
by DetroitThrow 6y ago
I would hope they wouldn't dare to do so as the scientific community aren't particularly accepting of papers espousing the correlation of airplane usage to autism diagnoses either. If the public is now more aware of garbage scienc
527.
by DetroitThrow 6y ago
I see what you're saying, but our choices really do result in either negative outcomes for us as individuals by having to eat increasingly large costs of child rearing at the expense of agency/disposable income/enjoyment, or
528.
by DetroitThrow 6y ago
"...a rudimentary web-application framework that made it nearly impossible to find a technical solution to the harassment problem" To me, this is analogous to the perhaps undeserved "the internet is a series of tubes" la
529.
by DetroitThrow 6y ago
>People like a device. They tend to not like a bunch of devices, which is why smartphones became so popular. But since this is something that would basically be a desk accessory, it might work. I feel differently - I feel like this would
530.
by DetroitThrow 6y ago
"always on" qualms aside, I think such a tool is a valuable utility to give to users, especially the features described on the website. However, I'm would not pay an extra $25/month (or worse, $50) on top of my Zoom and
531.
by DetroitThrow 6y ago
Ahaha. @dang, this is the issue with allowing unverified throwaways. Speaking of that, I'd be happy to verify my location if you'd be interested!
532.
by DetroitThrow 6y ago
Perhaps "safe and responsible nuclear energy" would be compelling to a broader crowd. I think for some it's already insinuated by the phrase, but I wager it would help remove ambiguity for others.
533.
by DetroitThrow 6y ago
While withholding some details happens in murder cases, this is the first I've heard of there being voluntary editorial standards that restrict information about the murders of serial killers. In fact, you'd generally think there&
534.
by DetroitThrow 6y ago
>If a poor person were murdered like this, it would be newsworthy. This is wrong, unless you insinuate "if poor people were wealthy and powerful as well" when you say "murdered like this". It seems like make believe t
535.
by DetroitThrow 6y ago
Not to single you out and I assume you had innocent intentions, but we shouldn't keep standing silent when people describe degradation of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness as they would House of Cards or Breaking Bad. Our los
536.
by DetroitThrow 6y ago
Much of the power given to the President here seems to be from legislation itself or lack of legislation altogether. I don't think there's any constitutional changes that would need to take place in order to restrict executive pow
537.
by DetroitThrow 7y ago
As a local, I don't know the exact differences in culture today compared to 75 years ago. Though after hearing enough ranting from workers, line bosses, and industrial engineers about exciting topics like quality control, line effici