DeepSeaTortoise

9 ms·

91.
by DeepSeaTortoise 2y ago
Seems like they upgraded their abysmal 40Gbps peering, tho. https://www.peeringdb.com/net/196
92.
by DeepSeaTortoise 2y ago
TBH, I think you're worrying about a future that is likely to become much more fun than boring. For actual research mathematics, there is no reason why an AI (maybe not current entirely statistical models) shouldn't be able to gui
93.
by DeepSeaTortoise 2y ago
Must be a lack of regulations and compliance procedures giving potential entrepreneurs the legal framework to work within.
94.
by DeepSeaTortoise 2y ago
Statistics gave him the superpower of predicting the future: https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/fight-club-57-movie
95.
by DeepSeaTortoise 2y ago
? > it is very very clear, that the atheletes were custom fitted into the altered squirl suits Aren't the suits tested for compliance on the athlete? > trained specificaly and extensivly in there optimal use. traditional ski jump
96.
by DeepSeaTortoise 2y ago
Just how much extra performance could you gain by altering a suit in a way that was not detectable without taking the suit apart? The article mentions a 5% surface area increase potentially offering benefits, but that's A LOT and if th
97.
by DeepSeaTortoise 2y ago
IMO these are the major downsides of Rust in descending order of importance: - Project leadership being at the whims of the moderators - Language complexity - Openly embracing 3rd party libraries and ecosystems for pretty much anything - Ha
98.
by DeepSeaTortoise 2y ago
TBH, I REALLY like the tiny models. Like smollm2. Also lobotomized LLMs ("abliterated") can be a lot of fun.
99.
by DeepSeaTortoise 2y ago
Honestly, it seems to fail a lot on topics where there is a strong bias in the legacy media. There is also no "deduplication" of similar topics and related events. I'd suggest a very different approach, expanding on the metho
100.
by DeepSeaTortoise 2y ago
Look up "decolonize math" or "critical mathematics".
101.
by DeepSeaTortoise 2y ago
Maybe not obviously enough, but that was sarcastic
102.
by DeepSeaTortoise 2y ago
I really wish there was a separate category for "short and funny" xkcds. Some of them are incredibly hilarious, but the author is just way too productive.
103.
by DeepSeaTortoise 2y ago
Way worse. Even when the moon is finally settled on, I guarantee you that nobody will make any effort to clean it up and throw it away. It is truely sad that we can be sure that even thousands of years in the future, despite millions of hum
104.
by DeepSeaTortoise 2y ago
Unless the junior reaches out to you, don't keep those instructing him out of the loop. A short mail mentioning what you intent and asking for permission is enough
105.
by DeepSeaTortoise 2y ago
> What do you mean rebuilding Russia? Russia has taken quite a bit of damage, too (although it's tiny compared to Ukraine). But most importantly: No matter who ends up responsible for the costs in each of the cases, both countries n
106.
by DeepSeaTortoise 2y ago
Sir, please hold still while we insert you Neuralink.
107.
by DeepSeaTortoise 2y ago
> Mozilla wants all the money for its charitable activities instead. Describing Mozilla's derailment as "charitable activities" is like describing the Mexican cartels as "self-help groups". Never forget their &qu
108.
by DeepSeaTortoise 2y ago
Kinda, but the US made clear that at this point they will only back Zelensky in the negotiations. Without Russia and Ukraine agreeing on how to end this war, split the spoils and salvage the little that's left, outside parties will har
109.
by DeepSeaTortoise 2y ago
Westing House and Hitachi to some degree, too. Well, either I'm outdated or just plain dumb. Over the years I have amassed solid evidence that it might be the latter, tho.
110.
by DeepSeaTortoise 2y ago
> Russia would just nationalize the assets. What would US do about it, if they are not willing to do anything so far? I do not know what keeps governments from doing this, tbh. But up until now Russia has done so exclusively in a retalia
111.
by DeepSeaTortoise 2y ago
Yup, sums it up nicely, I think.
112.
by DeepSeaTortoise 2y ago
Not sure how to delete my previous comment but the claim that martial law extends only the power of the parliament is wrong. I've clearly relied on a bad source of information. There is a strong argument that the Ukrainian President l
113.
by DeepSeaTortoise 2y ago
They've built a pipeline real fast, tho. Couldn't have expected you need to put any fuel into it before something comes out. At least the riot shields were put to good use, right?
114.
by DeepSeaTortoise 2y ago
> Or showing up to a cabinet meeting in a graphic t shirt and ball cap? Sure, not what Trump likes. But what Zelensky was wearing did have very little influence on the outcome of the meeting at best. People dislike Zelensky having been c
115.
by DeepSeaTortoise 2y ago
> the whole thing was a setup with trying to pressure Zelensky into a bad deal. The deal was quite good. It basically coupled the rebuilding of Ukraine (and ownership shares resulting from it) to a fund, rather than the government itself
116.
by DeepSeaTortoise 2y ago
> Any economical damage they think is temporary and they see it as an investment. That's kinda what the deal is about, tho: 1. Ukraine gets rebuild, the US and Ukraine own huge portions of Ukraine's new industry through the fun
117.
by DeepSeaTortoise 2y ago
The "minerals deal" isn't one but in name, no idea why it's being sold as such. It's really just a Ukrainian sovereign reconstruction fund, with the option for the US to buy its way in. Also the fund is financed thr
118.
by DeepSeaTortoise 2y ago
Also Titanium is an awful metal to work with. Steel has the nice property of turning into any product with but a stern look, titanium torches your factory down if it doesn't like the air quality during its massage sessions.
119.
by DeepSeaTortoise 2y ago
Despite being sold as the "mineral deal" to the public, it has nearly nothing to do with them and doesn't give the US any significant control over them. It's all about establishing a semi-sovereign fund for Ukraine (slow
120.
by DeepSeaTortoise 2y ago
The problem is that western nuclear tech isn't very vertically integrated. If you buy a Russian nuclear power plant, Rosatom takes care of absolutely everything. If you buy a powerplant from anywhere else, you've got to juggle hun

More ›