Davidzheng

25 ms·

721.
by Davidzheng 3y ago
Yeah the previous comment is almost completely wrong. But on last point, it didn't get here by hard-coding and the reinforcement learning part at the end i think shows it definitely can "learn". I guess one thing I would stil
722.
by Davidzheng 5y ago
Rate of change of entropy i presume is what you meant
723.
by Davidzheng 5y ago
Lmao (obviously this never happened)
724.
by Davidzheng 5y ago
sorry but I don't think there is any sense in which the infant brain is a blank slate. Definitely not for vital functions (as seen by the "instinctual" abilities noted elsewhere in this thread, not in language/cognition,
725.
by Davidzheng 6y ago
I think hornets probably don't react to red light. I think bee researchers also use red lights in labs when extracting bees so they don't become active in the presence of light.
726.
by Davidzheng 6y ago
I'll leave the scientific explanation links to people who know more but here's a fun song about this https://youtu.be/k99bMtg4zRk
727.
by Davidzheng 6y ago
If you have to write complete inner product space a hundred times in an article that's pretty annoying tbh
728.
by Davidzheng 6y ago
If that comment is generated, I will quit my current job and work full time on AI. I don't believe it.
729.
by Davidzheng 6y ago
I question the premise here. Can young children (say <5) who don't know arithmetic at all learn the axioms from just a bunch of examples? This isn't how children are taught arithmetic; they are taught the rules/algorithm n
730.
by Davidzheng 6y ago
So the problem that constructive math has for real numbers is that it's hard to show real numbers exist at all, not that it's uncountable if you have its properties. Also the deeper point is that you have all the properties of the
731.
by Davidzheng 6y ago
Ok I think what happens here is that we assume for the real numbers an increasing sequence which is bounded converges. I think that a number system with this property is probably already hard to construct in constructive math.
732.
by Davidzheng 7y ago
I also think this is a stupid statistic, who the hell is counting the first March since blah year?
733.
by Davidzheng 7y ago
Sorry what? Are your numbers the world or US? In either way I think it's just impossible, no? There can't be hundreds of millions of deaths in the US due to starvation after this I don't think I need to justify this claim. (i
734.
by Davidzheng 7y ago
Agree with your point but is there a reason you used the Unibomber as your example? He was a math professor at Berkeley, surely if anyone in prison can produce good research he probably can...