Dave3of5

36 ms·

361.
by Dave3of5 5y ago
Or maybe it's shades of grey in between ...
362.
by Dave3of5 5y ago
Hmmm seems low but how likely is this to actually go against FB. Seems they have many of these lawsuits against them and they always manage to wriggle out of them.
363.
by Dave3of5 5y ago
To be honest most of the C-Level of Uber seem super shady so I'm not surprised that he "allegedly" done this.
364.
by Dave3of5 5y ago
Mistakes can be fixed if they are small scale i.e. one bad hire stand out at a small company and can be fired much more easily. What you're missing is that for these small companies they are excluding the best candidates with this proc
365.
by Dave3of5 5y ago
This is only true for companies that have a large talent pool e.g. FAANG companies. For some small 30 person business in the back of nowhere that wants you in the office 5 days a week they cannot be anywhere near as picky.
366.
by Dave3of5 5y ago
8 hour take-home ? Shesh that's terrible.
367.
by Dave3of5 5y ago
Company I was working with done an internal study on this I believe CSAT or a simple average were better if your goal is to improve revenue.
368.
by Dave3of5 5y ago
> You couldn’t use GitHub, Slack, or even our cloud platform without first learning how to navigate all of the custom tools and bots that had been put together to gate access to everything and make it work. First time in a really big org
369.
by Dave3of5 5y ago
You're taking those statements out of context read just a tiny bit further and it says: "That is, while there is value in the items on the right, we value the items on the left more" So it's doesn't say forget all p
370.
by Dave3of5 5y ago
This is hyperbole and based upon anecdotal evidence. As a counterpoint I've been part of a company that "failed" due to overwhelming tech debt. I was one of the "lucky" few that was kept on after the redundancies in
371.
by Dave3of5 5y ago
> because what are they good for? Session cookies i.e. allow you to login to a website.
372.
by Dave3of5 5y ago
Ovh and scaleway?
373.
by Dave3of5 5y ago
Always found that quote interesting as is not really correct. Everyone is a percentage of those traits. No one is universally clever and never does anything stupid for example. It's putting people in a box which people love to do.
374.
by Dave3of5 5y ago
Not sure if this is good or bad. The people involved are big law firms and investment companies and such. The initial medium post has no detail whatsoever.
375.
by Dave3of5 5y ago
The open folder command is unbound by default on windows. Is it meant to be like that ? I literally couldn't open any folder. Also on windows by default it leaves a separate command window hanging which seems odd. Why isn't this l
376.
by Dave3of5 5y ago
> Oh, you can't because you're making 300k base + 2 years away from 800k in RSUs I'm working in a semi big tech company and not making anywhere near that (in UK) should I cry myself to sleep ?
377.
by Dave3of5 5y ago
What facebook (meta) bought was access to a treasure trove of data which they will sell to advertisers to make billions of dollars. It's nothing to do with a "funny picture company" and $400 million was a good price for what
378.
by Dave3of5 5y ago
It's funny how it links to their jobs. I've applied to companies like this in the past the likelihood of you even receiving a reply is close to zero.
379.
by Dave3of5 5y ago
Same been in that role and in a similar role at the moment. It's hard but this is the industry I can't change that anymore I just have to work with these people long enough so I can retire.
380.
by Dave3of5 5y ago
Overengineering is a non technical problem but of course most tech companies only interview devs on their technical skills. I've found is that once a dev has an idea of how something is suppose to work it's hard to get them to thi
381.
by Dave3of5 5y ago
I have 15 years working for a bunch of unknown small businesses under my belt so I'm in a similar situation. The answer for me is a resounding no it did not help in the slightest. I too actually enjoyed doing these problems personally.
382.
by Dave3of5 6y ago
> I'm not being too serious about rethinking whether they're necessary, to be clear! My apologies if I came off condescending, it's hard to impart tone of voice in text. > I don't really understand why it is doing
383.
by Dave3of5 6y ago
It does not support joins. The expectation is that you "Preload" your data which is a fancy way of saying load it all into memory. The performance of this is trash so don't use that ORM there are a few better ORMs for GO ment
384.
by Dave3of5 6y ago
Just a friendly reminder to anyone reading this about v1 of GORM. It doesn't properly support JOINS: https://github.com/go-gorm/gorm/issues/1436 Note that there is some work for v2 in allowing users to c
385.
by Dave3of5 7y ago
> meaningfully improved your life You'll need to define that if you want a proper response. I suspect you don't really want a proper response and are just looking for a way to shit on people who have bought these devices. Btw l