Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
DannyBee
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
18 ms
·
211.
▲
by
DannyBee
1y ago
"It's an Open Source project - I don't understand what people are complaining about. Noone is entitled to receive free Docker images. " While this is true, in all of these discussions, somewhere the notion of responsibil
212.
▲
by
DannyBee
1y ago
>But wait, how do you know that's what this is? A lot of these extensions come from Intel/AMD/etc clients first, and because of how long it takes a thing to make it into mainstream chips, it was probably conceived of and w
213.
▲
by
DannyBee
1y ago
A lot of this sort of thing come from AMD/Intel clients, rather than internally. In this particular case, it definitely does :)
214.
▲
by
DannyBee
1y ago
Intel Ethernet pps input pin works much much better for this. See how the open timecard mini folks do it. Easy to get sub microsecond even on cheap embedded. Most m.2 of Intel chipsets expose it (for example) as well.
215.
▲
by
DannyBee
1y ago
I use fairly precise time but that's because I control high speed machinery remotely. The synchronization is the important part (the actual time doesn't matter). At 1200 inches per minute, being a millisecond off will put a noti
216.
▲
by
DannyBee
1y ago
It would be much more effective to even out things , and trivial (engineering wise) to stop wasting the outputs of all these heat pumps by effective integration. Ie dump heat removed by ac or freezer into hot water heating, etc I'm a
217.
▲
by
DannyBee
1y ago
I mean, it's not untypical as a view. In reality, successful society lives halfway down tons of slippery slopes at any given point in time, and engineers in particular hate this. Yet this has been true since basically forever. I'
218.
▲
by
DannyBee
1y ago
"If the machine shop is so tightly constrained and error-phobic, that sounds like there's very little space of tinkering, exploration or innovation." This is the opposite of brittle. You say this as if those things are desire
219.
▲
by
DannyBee
1y ago
That is if you use it to replace the audio functionality, sure. If all your center console/stereo did before was a broken spotify interface, and now has lots of functionality, then yes, carplay is much better. As i said, that would con
220.
▲
by
DannyBee
1y ago
Rivians software is quite good. The number of times I've wished it had carplay was low and is now zero that they moved to Google maps instead of their own in the past 6 months (the maps themselves and the interface were totally fine,
221.
▲
by
DannyBee
1y ago
Without any data it's impossible to even tell what this means or whether it matters. IE even as a comparitive term it's useless without real data. Theoretically better (which is questionable at best in this case) doesn't mea
222.
▲
by
DannyBee
1y ago
It's only terrible if it actually matters? Also it doesn't look like you are using any of the optimized lockless implementations like crossfire/etc, so not sure what this actually proves?
223.
▲
by
DannyBee
1y ago
Ignoring all the other problems with this article that have been pointed out around definitions, it also claims that lockless is slow anyway. Without giving literally any data. Good news: it's not slow Let's take rust, which has
224.
▲
by
DannyBee
1y ago
All citations should have been shepardized. This is standard practice for lawyers for decades. Court rules always require you only cite good law. So you will be excortiated for valid but overturned citations too. This is actually one of the
225.
▲
by
DannyBee
1y ago
Lawyer here. I'm not sure why you think AI will fix the first part. What AI does is not a significant part of the cost or labor in the vast majority of kinds of cases. If you have a specific area in mind, happy to go into it with you.
226.
▲
by
DannyBee
1y ago
Lawyers are required to actually cite properly and check their citations are correct, as well as verify they are citing precedent that is still good (ie has not been overturned). This is known as shepardizing. This is done automatically wit
227.
▲
by
DannyBee
1y ago
Errr, what? First, you are not actually correct on the question. Here, let me quote the question: "Honest question, does it aerosolize pathogens that cause food-borne illness?" That is literally not "does it aerosolize flui
228.
▲
by
DannyBee
1y ago
Look - this is a really bad answer in a lot of ways, but rather than excoriate you for it, i'll try to be helpful by pointing out a simple fact: You are saying that it does some things. Literally everyone who could ever want to pay yo
229.
▲
by
DannyBee
1y ago
There are lots of great knife makers. Depends on what you want. Knives become about aesthetics and feel pretty quickly, price point wise. Not cutting functionality (ease of cutting, whatever). Victorinox knives rank very well in just abou
230.
▲
by
DannyBee
1y ago
So this I understand for sure. If it is a relaxing thing for you, cool. There are plenty of things I do by hand for the same reason. The people I worry about are the ones stropping a single knife 6000 times because they think it truly ma
231.
▲
by
DannyBee
1y ago
As far as i can know, the science does not support this answer :) In fact, it is probably the opposite - you should definitely use it on raw chicken.
232.
▲
by
DannyBee
1y ago
Good news - ~all food borne pathogens are much denser than air. Not like slightly, about 1000x denser. You are going to have about as much aerosolized raw chicken meat water (ARCMW) whether you use an ultrasonic knife or not. The ARCMW touc
233.
▲
by
DannyBee
1y ago
Interesting question, short answer - almost certainly not any more or less than you are already, and to the degree it does, it almost certainly is making things better and not worse. First - ~all food illness causing bacteria is denser tha
234.
▲
by
DannyBee
1y ago
Overall agree it seems cool, and maybe interesting. "People spend hundreds of dollars and many hours sharpening kitchen knives," The former, totally agree - i've seen people buy a tormek to do basic knife sharpening (not grin
235.
▲
by
DannyBee
1y ago
The appeals court did not seem very impressed. The oral argument is here: https://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/OAarchive/mp3/23-4451-20250912.... The first question they asked is "why didn't you ask for a bill o
236.
▲
by
DannyBee
1y ago
The normal answer to this is to request a bill of particulars, which was not requested here (afaict from the docket). I think there is some slightly down-in-the-weeds confusion here - what does an indictment require vs ... I think they scre
237.
▲
by
DannyBee
1y ago
As far as i can discern, the warrants aren't fraudulent. Warrants (in the US anyway) require reasonable belief that the crimes listed were committed. They don't have to be right, mind you (after all, that's what trial is for)
238.
▲
by
DannyBee
1y ago
I like to turn these into a madlibs sort of thing to see what I can come up with: 2024: Scale bacon-infused omelet making across multi-pan 2025: Evolve hybrid cooking for generative food 2027: Deliver an open platform for sovereign food mak
239.
▲
by
DannyBee
1y ago
https://assets.ibm.com/is/image/ibm/graham-carlow-photo-ibm-... "And here's a rendering of the building where we will process worthless humans into valuable silicon resources!"
240.
▲
by
DannyBee
1y ago
Good question, but actually not. The judges do absolutely everything they can to keep these things moving or settle. They force people to mediation, they force people to reduce the claims to get rid of shitty claims, etc. Everything they
More ›