DannyBee

11 ms·

121.
by DannyBee 8mo ago
I spend a lot of time in eplan, 3d cad programs, and cam programs (when working on machines, furniture, and cnc of furniture or machines respectively :P) However, the vast majority of time what i'm searching grabcad or friends it&#x27
122.
by DannyBee 8mo ago
It's also rarely worth being optimal in scalar code anymore, particularly at compilation speed cost. The exception here is memory accesses and branches that will miss. So the writing of useless zeros is egregious but other stuff just i
123.
by DannyBee 8mo ago
There are practical differences - phones store a lot more information that you will keep in your mind at once. You can actually eliminate phones entirely from your second example. If you had incriminating info on paper at one point, and mem
124.
by DannyBee 8mo ago
Unlocking/forced unlocking is not a 4th amendment issue, but a 5th amendment one. The 4th amendment would protect you from them seizing your phone in the first place for no good reason, but would not protect you from them seizing your
125.
by DannyBee 8mo ago
Lawyer here - let me try to help. This is an area that seems to confuse a lot of people because of what the 5th amendment says and doesn't say. The reason they can't force you to unlock your phone is not because your phone contain
126.
by DannyBee 8mo ago
Calling this "properly" is a stretch at best. I will say first that C libc does this - the functions are inline defined in header files, but this is mainly a pre-LTO artifact. Otherwise it has no particular advantage other than di
127.
by DannyBee 8mo ago
I may be able to resolve this, having hacked a bunch on M1N1 and such - the DFU port is going through a microcontroller with firmware. That is why, for example, it can properly process USB-PD messages that contain vendor defined message cod
128.
by DannyBee 8mo ago
You could port it, but i don't think the geometry kernel is the hard part. The code for the standard library is here: https://cad.onshape.com/documents/12312312345abcabcabcdeff/w... (Click tab manager in the
129.
by DannyBee 8mo ago
After further evaluation, it turns out the internet was a mistake
130.
by DannyBee 8mo ago
Yes, this is all true, but the comment I responded to wanted to be able to basically code rather than GUI sometimes , but still have the GUI up to date. Because of how onshape was built it makes this very very easy. Solidworks very much
131.
by DannyBee 8mo ago
I do understand what can happen (I'm an IP lawyer), but this basically requires enabling spotify to act as your attorney, since they still do not in fact own the rights, even with this. You can't manufacture standing here - only f
132.
by DannyBee 8mo ago
This is actually what onshape is, under the covers. The GUI is really just using their scripting primitives, etc. You can access it the same as they can, actually.
133.
by DannyBee 8mo ago
Boeshield has a tendency to increase friction though unless buffed really hard. Lanolin based coatings (fluid film, et al) don't have this issue. Of course, i live in a super-humid place these days, so i have to control humidity anyway
134.
by DannyBee 9mo ago
For most it is just serial number. The 8311 folks have scripts that will fully automate the cloning for most common devices. This is not like a "break open your hardware and attach wires" type thing. There are some ISPs issuing
135.
by DannyBee 9mo ago
They are not dumb but are very standardized. Unless they are issuing and verifying device certs you can almost certainly use your own PON equipment with very little effort. If they are using certs youd have to extract it. The vast majorit
136.
by DannyBee 9mo ago
The 8311 discord is a great source of technical info and help on using your own PON equipment of various sorts with providers
137.
by DannyBee 9mo ago
Yes, with right kind of PON SFP stick this is possible. Most kinds of PON sticks are still in the $150-300 range though for XGS-PON (I use an XGS-PON stick with AT&T instead of their modem)
138.
by DannyBee 9mo ago
Nah - the plaintiffs include record companies, who do have rights here.
139.
by DannyBee 9mo ago
The plaintiffs are actually record companies, spotify is tacked on at the end for some reason, and the article decided to confuse matters :)
140.
by DannyBee 9mo ago
"I'm not taking anybody's side here, as to what copyright law ought to be, but Spotify isn't abusing the legal process here". Normally, only those who own one or more of the exclusive rights in copyright can actuall
141.
by DannyBee 9mo ago
Except spotify doesn't own the copyright to the music. The record company plaintiffs make sense here - spotify does not. They don't own copyright in anything here, including the metadata.
142.
by DannyBee 9mo ago
I did actually read all 40 pages of it. I frequently read law journal articles, among with lots of other types of journals and papers. I also used to maintain up to date reading lists of various areas (compiler optimization, for example) be
143.
by DannyBee 9mo ago
This is fair - but i think you are undershooting what is normally thought of as plastics - because it includes most coatings. So the stuff sprayed on your cabinets, rolled onto your floor, paint on walls, etc, are all polymers of various s
144.
by DannyBee 9mo ago
It's also an submission to UC hastings law journal, as it also says right before that? The automated tagging with a BUSL ID is just how BUSL's system for papers of any sort works. For reference: I did my first year of law school
145.
by DannyBee 9mo ago
Cool, then we can safely give your comments exactly the same treatment - since they are completely uninformed speculation about a paper you haven't read.
146.
by DannyBee 9mo ago
I think you may be confused. This is not a research paper, it's an op-ed in a law journal. SSRN is where most draft law review/journal articles are published, which may be the source of confusion. For most other fields, it is a so
147.
by DannyBee 9mo ago
Care to actually engage with the text instead of deciding to paint the entire profession with a crappy brush? I guess i'll start with calling two well known law professors "$500 an hour nitpickers" when they don't earn 5
148.
by DannyBee 9mo ago
Ignoring people, what sort of effect does it have on materials (plastics, etc)? The only studies i can find suggest this is an issue. For example: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/7/4141 The results of t
149.
by DannyBee 9mo ago
I have fs.com armored cable installed for 10 years now. Different times and spools. It is all in perfect shape. They test all their cable. Something is almost certainly disintegrating your cable. If you have any spare old pvc pipe or s
150.
by DannyBee 9mo ago
This is the TRO order: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/ima... There is no written decision on the vacating other than what you already linked. Reading the TRO, a lot jumps out at me.

More ›