DannyBee

36 ms·

421.
by DannyBee 2y ago
Yeah. I have 800 amp service which is basically always done with parallel 400 mcm or 500 mcm (depending on where it is coming from, since POCO doesn't have to follow NEC) Within conduit, there is basically no other option. In free ai
422.
by DannyBee 2y ago
Yes. I'm not suggesting they increase the voltage, as i said, there are lots of tradeoffs. But i'll also say - outside of heat, all of the things you listed are not safety concerns (obviously, electrical noise can be if it's
423.
by DannyBee 2y ago
This is because they are trying to parallel like 50amps (it's 12 volt IIRC) over a few conductors to get to 600watts. If it becomes unbalanced due to any number of reasons, none of those individual cables can come close to handling it
424.
by DannyBee 2y ago
The fascination i sort of get - sometimes rabbit holes are fun to jump down if you have time. I'm working on a satisfactory node modeling tool for fun, and built one of the stores (I have a few different stores) using CRDT's and a
425.
by DannyBee 2y ago
You state this as if you think it contributes something, but i'm not sure what. I guess you think we are talking about crimes in DC, which you correctly state would not be chargeable in DC. But we aren't talking about that, we are
426.
by DannyBee 2y ago
Won't save them from state prosecution, and it seems there is plenty to dig into here. For the types of crime Krebs is talking about, it's really easy to get charged in lots of states with lots of things, and the statute of limita
427.
by DannyBee 2y ago
Honestly, it's a great post, and I love the idea of low effort posts, so i hope you keep doing it.
428.
by DannyBee 2y ago
This of course, falls squarely into what i wrote at the end of my comment. Why is money the only thing to do here? Why do you assume that is the driver, despite tons of data suggesting it's simply not the only driver? Can you please,
429.
by DannyBee 2y ago
This is again, so reductive i don't know where to begin. You really just assume everyone, at their core, is money driven enough. So to you, everything is about whether they are beign offered enough money. You even use the amazingly c
430.
by DannyBee 2y ago
Again, we have? I knew, of course, this would be the response. But i'm not sure why, in the history of the world, people assume we haven't tried paying people more in various fields, and that "managers and bean counters aren
431.
by DannyBee 2y ago
Sure, but increasing that sample size would require doing more than just paying them more. IE it's not particularly useful to say "we will pay 1 million billion dollars to anyone in the united states who wishes to be an air traffi
432.
by DannyBee 2y ago
We do? Is there a reason you believe otherwise? There are nearly infinite studies in infinite fields on this, and despite claims here, the results are mixed at best. Certainly not the utopia consistently predicted. I'm sure someone wil
433.
by DannyBee 2y ago
There are plenty of jobs that you can't pay people enough money to want to do. The notion that if you just pay enough, people who are otherwise qualified will do anything, is amazingly reductive. It's a super US-centric view, and
434.
by DannyBee 2y ago
So let's take the case of USAID. USAID was "created" by EO originally, but was recreated in 1998 by congressional act (The Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998, 22 U.S.C. 6501 et seq.): "(a) In general Un
435.
by DannyBee 2y ago
Sure - let me try to give you a complete answer. So the thing about appropriations is - they actually have to spend them unless it says something else. It's not like a budget. It's an order to spend money a certain way. That&#x
436.
by DannyBee 2y ago
This title is wrong, besides not matching the headline (which is rightish, and definitely more right than this title). Apple requested a stay pending their appeal of the judge's order. The stay pending appeal was denied by this judge.
437.
by DannyBee 2y ago
It's not wrong, it just depends on what you consider an "agency". If you mean "any organized entity that contains federal employees", by that definition, sure lots of "agencies" exist that are created by t
438.
by DannyBee 2y ago
I'll add to the other good reply - in our constitutional system, branches are not allowed to delegate significant amounts of their power to other entities. So congress, for example, cannot delegate making laws to some other entity. The
439.
by DannyBee 2y ago
Yeah, that's a good guess. These days i don't have to figure it out any more because I mostly do nylon on printers meant for nylon :)
440.
by DannyBee 2y ago
Agree on all points - MMA being the winner is obvious. One thing to keep in mind is that a lot of these PETG filaments are not true PETG's. I didn't get a chance to watch with sound on, but curious if he verified it was really PET
441.
by DannyBee 2y ago
Sure, but then i also see: "Cooling:Water-cooled deposition head. Chiller lncluded" (spelling error in original :P) the deposition head is where the lasers are.
442.
by DannyBee 2y ago
I'm surprised they didn't name it SQL or Death Or 1?
443.
by DannyBee 2y ago
the integration kit specs say 1000w 9 x 450nm diode lasers. I can't tell if that's 9x1000w diode lasers, or 9*111W diode lasers. Given the 2kw-5kw average power need they quote, i'm guessing it's the latter.
444.
by DannyBee 2y ago
It makes zero sense to do this for metal but then have to remachine the result for precision or finish. Their "reckoning that it's cheaper" seems highly inconsistent with the cost of most billets and the speed of most VMC&#x2
445.
by DannyBee 2y ago
Yes, but you generally can't affect the rights of a third party through litigation, unless it involves the third party. You can't really end run around this by doing it in the other direction, because it has the same effect - even
446.
by DannyBee 2y ago
Generally no, actually. Not without apple being a party. Now, over the past few decades this has been slowly relaxed in practice (IE courts willing to try to do it), but the underlying precedent has not actually changed on this. Hence my c
447.
by DannyBee 2y ago
The court's position here is strange - you can't bind non-parties with injunctions. This is even part of the FRCP - see 65(d)(2) The only exception is basically aiding and abetting. This is well settled caselaw basically forever.
448.
by DannyBee 2y ago
Lawyer here: As a general rule, you can't bind non-parties with injunctions. Courts have no authority to enforce such injunctions either. A very recent example: https://reason.com/volokh/2025/01/24/g
449.
by DannyBee 2y ago
Agreed - It's beyond wrong. For example, at the core of plenty of numerical libraries is 30+ year old fortran code from netlib that works great. It's just done. It does what it's supposed to. It does not have meaningful bugs
450.
by DannyBee 2y ago
This seems not even close to the worst feature of rust - this seems like it needs some more design work and baking. Like lots of things. The amount of hyperbole in this article makes it a bit hard to take the author all that seriously. Is t

More ›