Daho0n

48 ms·

451.
by Daho0n 6y ago
My god I almost fell of my chair laughing! >Recent studies show that 87% of Bird Poop in populated areas falls on people’s cars. Why is this? Confidential documents leaked in 2018 revealing that “Bird Poop” is actually a form of liquidat
452.
by Daho0n 6y ago
Shipping only count for something like 2% of human caused release of CO2 and the pollution isn't local (cars inside a city is worse for humans). I agree something should be done ASAP but it isn't a low hanging fruit (hard to regul
453.
by Daho0n 6y ago
The e-up is only cheap as long as you don't compare to other cars equal in size. VW is far behind in EVs for now sadly.
454.
by Daho0n 6y ago
>Algorithms, he says, are reducing everything to "subject matter or genre", rendering any kind of curation, and understanding of artistic worth, meaningless. I have to agree with Scorsese. They talk about how much Netflix does
455.
by Daho0n 6y ago
Those doesn't look like facts at all but your opinions but feel free to prove otherwise. Let's start with a simple one: >solar and wind have huge land-use requirements compared to nuclear Can you build nuclear in the oceans, sa
456.
by Daho0n 6y ago
And yet we have places like the Marshall Islands where US nuclear waste is leaking at this very moment. If it is that easy to contain then why isn't happening? The problem with nuclear is that people are too greedy to use it safely or
457.
by Daho0n 6y ago
Well, let's base it on fukushima then.
458.
by Daho0n 6y ago
>leaves you thinking that using nuclear power at all is incredibly dangerous and foolish No one in his right mind can state with a straight face that nuclear power isn't incredibly dangerous. It might not be foolish with the right r
459.
by Daho0n 6y ago
Go back to reddit.
460.
by Daho0n 6y ago
>safety features and regulations are a major part of nuclear's cost. Which regulations -that aren't there for safety- are driving up cost of nuclear power? I can't find any. Are you saying we should cut down on safety to m
461.
by Daho0n 6y ago
>in a time when institutions and experts are failing all around us I'm sorry but that is not happening IMO. What is happening is non-experts decide what to do without listening to institutions and experts. We are seeing the result o
462.
by Daho0n 6y ago
What do you do if you have to shut down the nuclear power plant in bad weather for some reason? Build a new one as a backup? There's always a weak link if you want to find one, nuclear, wind or whatever.
463.
by Daho0n 6y ago
Citation needed.
464.
by Daho0n 6y ago
At a minimum a reasonable time for a package for it to be a good citizen in the system is what is in Debian LTS.
465.
by Daho0n 6y ago
A perfect show of how little is know about the effect of those drugs: >they're also used to treat a spectrum of anxiety disorders like OCD and panic disorder A massive amount of people treated for depression have panic disorder bec
466.
by Daho0n 6y ago
I'm not sure if I can trust a random article on the internet but I do (mostly) trust my eyes. I have lots of small bird-feet-tracks outside my window where they have melted the snow. So clearly either they are not freezing because they
467.
by Daho0n 6y ago
Who? The US?
468.
by Daho0n 6y ago
Unless you pay 0% interest rates it clearly increase inequality as all it does is transfer money to the rich.
469.
by Daho0n 6y ago
Sure they are. Almost everyone does, to the point it is really hard to compete if you don't make some magic debt too. They transfer money from country X to country Y, then a company owned by themselves build them a new warehouse for mo
470.
by Daho0n 6y ago
And I'm sure you believe that US and foreign competitors of SpaceX who says the same thing are just spewing PR, right? It was a random video. The message is not wrong. Being snippy doesn't change facts.
471.
by Daho0n 6y ago
I'm not saying anything bad about the landing. It was a great feat. I just find the chanting often done in US videos disgusting.
472.
by Daho0n 6y ago
> "Artificial lighting saves land because plants can be grown above each other, but if the electricity for the lighting comes from solar panels, then the savings are canceled out by the land required to install the solar panels&quot
473.
by Daho0n 6y ago
You can't really compare the US to the EU though and this isn't going to the US supreme court. You don't need to be successful in stifling competition to be anticompetitive so market share enough to be a "real" mono
474.
by Daho0n 6y ago
I stopped watching videos like these when they started chanting like some crazy cult when things went well (USA! USA! USA!). No wonder we can't just get along.
475.
by Daho0n 6y ago
S/he already did. We just don't know yet.
476.
by Daho0n 6y ago
I'm not commenting on the rest of your post but the "dominating the commercial sector" just so you don't think I'm badmouthing SpaceX. Just wanted to add that if you sell X pounds of cargo to the commercial sector b
477.
by Daho0n 6y ago
I'm not saying SpaceX isn't doing good but the price has gone up per (re)launch, not down as projected, so at the moment of it were possible to buy a trip to space for a few tourists it would be cheaper on a shuttle.
478.
by Daho0n 6y ago
They really didn't. SpaceX is not cheaper than the shuttle no matter how many times it gets repeated. That SpaceX fudges the numbers so it is hard to compare doesn't make it true. In reality SpaceX is more expensive than not only
479.
by Daho0n 6y ago
No one have said otherwise. The point still stands that landing on earth is not in the same universe as landing on Mars. Comparing is stupid.
480.
by Daho0n 6y ago
That wasn't the point but this is Reddit level snarky commenting so I'll be on my way.

More ›