Dah00n

15 ms·

211.
by Dah00n 3y ago
>State actors definitely have these resources. USA, China, Russia at a minimum Do they? Amazon and Google level knowledge, both from live systems with data like all of Google and Amazon, but also the developers and analysts to look throu
212.
by Dah00n 3y ago
>But this doesn't mean that Azure and AWS also had to wait The article says they didn't wait, but got informed.
213.
by Dah00n 3y ago
Sure, trust in a third party that has a good reputation versus the company itself that says "trust us". Big difference.
214.
by Dah00n 3y ago
>How did Spotify get away not having a union for over 15 years? I think you are missing the point here. You seem to be basing your expectations on one union by how another union behaves. I have no idea why they do what they do, but this
215.
by Dah00n 3y ago
>Google is in this case less developer friendly. They made secret deals with Spotify Are you saying Apple is different? I'd like to see the info on those deals if it isn't secret. Like the Spotify deal, Facebook deal, etc.
216.
by Dah00n 3y ago
>Gamestop meme traders deliberately set out to smash the system That is a very strange and biased POV. They did the exact same thing as people have done for years and years, the only difference being this was joined by many people not
217.
by Dah00n 3y ago
Learned my lesson. They will not see a cent of my money.
218.
by Dah00n 3y ago
Elon Musk is known to fire people that support unions openly. I very much doubt they will tell the whole truth if asked, unless it is personally by a friend, not by a newspaper.
219.
by Dah00n 3y ago
>Why did Elon pick this fight? In Elon's world, a world with Unions is a world with a feudal system where the Unions are the lords and poor owners like Elon are vassals and fiefs (his words, not mine).
220.
by Dah00n 3y ago
Even though Spotify does have some metal in their catalogue, I don't see how a metalworkers union could strike against Spotify. Instead of some anti-US sentiment that you not-so-hidden point at, the real answer is different unions with
221.
by Dah00n 3y ago
The structure bombed into dust 99% of the times it was tried.
222.
by Dah00n 3y ago
This doesn't matter, as part of a strike is to block others from doing what you are striking against. They have "guards" in place.
223.
by Dah00n 3y ago
It also isn't really encrypted. The really juicy bits (metadata) is available for Apple to read as it sees fit.
224.
by Dah00n 3y ago
If there are no security audits by disinterested third parties, then it can clearly not be trusted. If they want trust and can provide it, they likely would have done this. Have they?
225.
by Dah00n 3y ago
Does Proton (or Meta) see that Pin or password, or is it client-side only (as far as we know)?
226.
by Dah00n 3y ago
What Big Tech really wants is metadata. Metadata and which images are sent isn't encrypted. So this is E2EE minus what Meta wants to see. If one cares about privacy, one cares about metadata. Access to metadata equals poor privacy and
227.
by Dah00n 3y ago
There are a lot of good ones. Like this: >Fortune cookies are associated with Chinese cuisine, but were actually invented in Japan, and are almost never eaten in China, where they are seen as American. I've never seen a fortune cook
228.
by Dah00n 3y ago
>While the EU's rules effectively apply only against newly designed and released products after the rules come into force in 2024, India's version does not. Instead, it applies to all electronic devices sold in the country, whi
229.
by Dah00n 3y ago
As a few here wrote would happen: Danish unions are now getting in on the action.
230.
by Dah00n 3y ago
Well, it is a list of new cars, but yes, I agree it isn't that useful. >I still have trouble believing BMW has 3x the reliability in the first three years than practically all the American manufacturers. I do not know it 3 times i
231.
by Dah00n 3y ago
>If the goal was to kill Israelis, torture and humiliate them then yes it was a tremendous success. Which I'd argue is the whole point of what they are doing. That and getting the world, well, not on their side exactly, but on not-I
232.
by Dah00n 3y ago
You are arguing semantics. A filter is a filter is a filter. Apple applied filters to phone images. Your definition of "more realistic" might be on your Filter Positive List, but it is no less a filter than one that make skin whit
233.
by Dah00n 3y ago
In my more than four decades of life, I have yet to learn AM and PM for long enough for it to stick. So, yes.
234.
by Dah00n 3y ago
The fourth E: Embrace, extend, extinguish, exhaust. Users are becoming too exhausted to try to fix all the crap Microsoft throws at them, after they (tried to?) EEE'd all the other easily available options. (Edit: Oops, pressed send t
235.
by Dah00n 3y ago
>There are some reasons you'd want to process faces differently Yes and then you have applied a filter.
236.
by Dah00n 3y ago
That is still being a boiling frog in Google's water. Just with a label slapped on top of the logo.
237.
by Dah00n 3y ago
Not even Brave would do that. Wait..
238.
by Dah00n 3y ago
IE held back the development of the WWW. That would be the spot Safari has today. What Chrome is doing is much worse, since it is strangling the web, not just holding back new features.
239.
by Dah00n 3y ago
This is not the same thing and you know it.
240.
by Dah00n 3y ago
>They only care that it shows them a picture that looks like what they saw Here it most definitely does not look like what they saw.

More ›