DagAgren

9 ms·

61.
by DagAgren 6y ago
The business model is to charge both a delivery fee and a commission on the sales price. That way, you can make it profitable, even when paying a fair price to couriers, as long as you can keep your business lean and your delivery routing e
62.
by DagAgren 6y ago
I don't get the feeling you've really given it a fair chance, or tried to understand why it does what it does. Swift really is much more readable than Objective-C, too.
63.
by DagAgren 6y ago
Doesn't seem like there would be much demand to run legacy Objective-C code on other platforms, as it would most likely be strongly tied into macOS or iOS APIs that would be availble anyway.
64.
by DagAgren 6y ago
Agreed. I have not seen any other language that is as pleasant to use. It is not perfect, but everything else is even further from perfect.
65.
by DagAgren 6y ago
> But somehow after nearly 6 years Objective-C stills feels better This experience is shared by basically nobody? I used to love Objective-C, which was unusual even before Swift, but I would not in a million years switch back to using it
66.
by DagAgren 6y ago
Both. If you have only one, you have a shit product nobody wants.
67.
by DagAgren 6y ago
Instead of wasting everyone's time arguing pointless semantics, have you considered actually engaging in constructive discussion?
68.
by DagAgren 6y ago
This is just in no way a realistic attack scenario. It gains you nearly nothing for a massive amount of work.
69.
by DagAgren 6y ago
If you have those resources, there are far more effective ways to track people that do not require relying on the contact tracing system.
70.
by DagAgren 6y ago
Yes, and you reveal your keys for the past when you are diagnosed, and then you go inside, stay inside, and do not reveal any further keys. This is not useful for stalking.
71.
by DagAgren 6y ago
If you have COVID you should not be distributing your daily keys, you should be staying the fuck inside.
72.
by DagAgren 6y ago
Yes, because they actually designed their system so that it can not be used for stalking. Go read up about it.
73.
by DagAgren 6y ago
> You can't steal physical objects via TCP due to censorship resistance. You can steal money, and passwords. And you can steal things in the physical world and sell them over the internet. > If anything censorship resistance help
74.
by DagAgren 6y ago
> How is it not? Because it helps criminals commit crimes. Not crimes as in "oh the government doesn't like you doing this", crimes as in theft, fraud, blackmail and child rape.
75.
by DagAgren 6y ago
> Most people have an intuition about particles That intuition is also most likely completely wrong.
76.
by DagAgren 6y ago
That maybe "censorship resistance" isn't the universal good some people make it out as. Maybe the people who benefit the most from it, and who make up the majority of those who actually benefit, are criminals. Maybe it's
77.
by DagAgren 6y ago
Pretty sure my point still stands.
78.
by DagAgren 6y ago
I think I understand monads less now.
79.
by DagAgren 6y ago
Well, that is exactly what they are doing here too.
80.
by DagAgren 6y ago
And they are mainly used for breaking the law.
81.
by DagAgren 6y ago
I'll just point out that neither of you have managed to really take a single step towards actually explaining monads.
82.
by DagAgren 6y ago
Yes, well, good example.
83.
by DagAgren 6y ago
"Giving out money for free" isn't really something that make me think something is LESS of a scam. Giving out free money is literally what every every cryptocurrency scam does at first.
84.
by DagAgren 6y ago
I am convinced that monads induce a very specific kind of brain damage that makes a person incapable of ever explaining monads.
85.
by DagAgren 6y ago
In practice, meaning, let's let him kill a few of them before we jump to conclusions?
86.
by DagAgren 6y ago
> Oh they are, I just prefer to focus on good things rather than bad things. If you can afford not to focus on them, then trust me, they are absolutely not focused on doing that. Your experiences is very different from those who are ac
87.
by DagAgren 6y ago
That would mean either implementing your entire API twice, or adding layers of pointless indirection, for extremely little gain. It is just not reasonable.
88.
by DagAgren 6y ago
I know, this site is for having horrible political opinions and never being challenged on them because that is a "flamewar".
89.
by DagAgren 6y ago
It doesn't. You can access all Objective-C features from C, it's just a bit of a pain. There is a C interface to the Objective-C runtime.
90.
by DagAgren 6y ago
iOS still exists.

More ›