DagAgren

34 ms·

331.
by DagAgren 7y ago
Having it as a dynamic library is not enough. It has to be a dynamic library tgat you can replace . This doesn’t work when, for instance, distributing through many app stores.
332.
by DagAgren 7y ago
Not explicitly, but in practice, it does. It is often not viable to jump through the hoops required to do it. That is, if your lawyers will even let you try.
333.
by DagAgren 7y ago
VS now ships clang, so that should improve support for C considerably. Objective-C is C, with extensions. Swift interoperates with C, not C++.
334.
by DagAgren 7y ago
LGPL is incompatible with signed executables, which locks it out of anything distributed through an app store, which is a lot of software these days.
335.
by DagAgren 7y ago
Is it better that no tools will actually be able to export the format? Also, a GPL-licensed encoder will in no way stop incompatible extensions.
336.
by DagAgren 7y ago
At university, we once built a networked doorbell system for the offices. Lots of small displays with a button outside the doors, connected on a CAN bus to a controller, that you could configure, and another device in the office to make noi
337.
by DagAgren 7y ago
Since we do not know what exactly it is, defining "directly" is not really something you can do. But, for instance, electroweak interaction is being looked at, I gather?
338.
by DagAgren 7y ago
There is not such a lack of public voices that we must give every single one, even though of absolutely awful people, an equal hearing. There are many, many people who would be more informative to listen on this topic. They could have been
339.
by DagAgren 7y ago
Indirectly, yes. Directly, not yet.
340.
by DagAgren 7y ago
And how do you find out if they turn out to be right, if you dismiss them immediately as "ridiculous"? That is not how science works. There are other ways of judging if a theory is worth exploring than just a "it must be test
341.
by DagAgren 7y ago
Many discoveries in physics have quite large timespans between being theorised to exist, and being actually detected. Was it ridiculous to say those might exist?
342.
by DagAgren 7y ago
Not at all relevant, as we can see the effects of dark matter in many places, very clearly.
343.
by DagAgren 7y ago
Is it really worth this much effort of yours to defend the honour of a guy who is so involved with a pedophile rapist and pimp that he arranged a conference on said pedophile's private island, where he kept his sex slaves? Like, isn&#x
344.
by DagAgren 7y ago
"There's no evidence" is a weird claim to make against a thing that is well known to have happened, to the point that it is documented on Wikipedia? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_M._Krauss#Allega
345.
by DagAgren 7y ago
Yeah, that has never actually happened.
346.
by DagAgren 7y ago
That he got kicked off their board for being a sex pest may have something to do with it.
347.
by DagAgren 7y ago
You can't really assume a strong password, because if you have to type in 12 characters, letters and punctuation marks every time you want to look at your phone, you're going to give up on the whole thing pretty quickly. To be usa
348.
by DagAgren 7y ago
Such a program would certainly not be connecting to any network itself.
349.
by DagAgren 7y ago
I mean, this is not particularly clever or creative. It's just a really straightforward solution to a simple problem.
350.
by DagAgren 7y ago
I have literally never felt "judged by the CoC police" in any project that has one. I have no idea why you would ever feel that way. Pretty much every CoC says "do not be a raging asshole". I am fully capable of not bein
351.
by DagAgren 7y ago
Sure. That is incredibly expensive and time-consuming, and due to anti-tampering protections has a high possibility of destroying the data before it can be extracted. So, not realistically viable in 99.99% of attack scenarios.
352.
by DagAgren 7y ago
No, Apple is using known technology that has existed for quite a while now. Secure enclaves aren't new or mysterious, they are established technology.
353.
by DagAgren 7y ago
How do you read data inside the secure enclave, then?
354.
by DagAgren 7y ago
Replacing components does not give you access to the secure enclave which is on-chip. And that is where the encryption key for the storage lives.
355.
by DagAgren 7y ago
That is not very strong protection - it lets you perform dictionary attacks at high speed. It is often more secure to generate a random, high-entropy key and storing it in secure storage, which is what the iPhone does.
356.
by DagAgren 7y ago
Physical access does not at all need to mean that the game is over, with today's architectures. With an iPhone, any storage you can access with physical access is going to be encrypted. The encryption key lives in the secure enclave, w
357.
by DagAgren 7y ago
That's not a choice we are faced with, though, is it?
358.
by DagAgren 7y ago
Nobody is judging him because he's rich. We're judging him for threatening and getting a guy sent to jail.
359.
by DagAgren 7y ago
What.
360.
by DagAgren 7y ago
Apple's updates often improve performance, and very rarely degrade it.

More ›