DaSHacka

27 ms·

751.
by DaSHacka 1y ago
Probably not even. The government could just pull a classic "we're doing this because terrorism" with the media emphasizing how great it is, and the masses would clap all the same.
752.
by DaSHacka 1y ago
The quoted text, and what I was responding to, was: "when wayland has been okay for a decade now"
753.
by DaSHacka 1y ago
But enough about Wayland
754.
by DaSHacka 1y ago
> The problem is, creating all this AI and advanced technology is directly crushing that world. Do you have a source for this?
755.
by DaSHacka 1y ago
> when wayland has been ok for a decade now? Looks like developers from Valve that were tasked on working on Wayland don't agree[0]. [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41640420
756.
by DaSHacka 1y ago
Think most murderers or thiefs would agree about those?
757.
by DaSHacka 1y ago
> No point using OpenAI when so many safer alternatives exist. And ironically, this now includes the Chinese AI companies too. Old bureaucratic fogeys will be the death of this nation.
758.
by DaSHacka 1y ago
This, and I ensure to anonymize any information I feed it, just in case. (Mostly just swapping out names / locations for placeholders)
759.
by DaSHacka 1y ago
Easiest way for both the rights holders and AI megacorpos to both be happy is to push all the responsiblity onto the average joe who can't afford as expensive lawyers/lobbyists.
760.
by DaSHacka 1y ago
To know what subscriptions we need to cancel.
761.
by DaSHacka 1y ago
Meritocracy beliefs have been considered "white supremicist rhetoric" in many programming circles for some time now. Honestly I still don't get it, I guess its just one of those first-world problems people invent to occupy th
762.
by DaSHacka 1y ago
Ah, Mac user?
763.
by DaSHacka 1y ago
I'd imagine it should work, so long as you use `curl.exe` and not `curl`
764.
by DaSHacka 1y ago
And I'm willing to bet you 2 BTC that OnlyFans will not.
765.
by DaSHacka 1y ago
> When I read the OP, I imagine this would link from the search results directly to Anna's archive and sci-hub You could just give users ISBNs or link to the book's metadata on openlibrary[0], both of which AA's native sea
766.
by DaSHacka 1y ago
I'd think people would get progressively more interested in shooting them the lower they're flying anyway
767.
by DaSHacka 1y ago
I somehow doubt the crows will cough up the perps name when interrogated....
768.
by DaSHacka 1y ago
If you check the bugzilla thread in the OP, this is specifically about adding manual search engines outside of automatic OpenSearch support. Theres a panel where you fill out the name, search URL, suggestion URL, and search keyword yourself
769.
by DaSHacka 1y ago
This has been my approach to presentations. If it was originally a google slides document, I download it locally before the presentation time, and even for local .pptx/.odp files I always make sure to export an extra copy in PDF format
770.
by DaSHacka 1y ago
100%, I'd love to see the template if GP ever makes a blog post about it
771.
by DaSHacka 1y ago
> I'd expect that each spam recipient is given a unique BTC address, so that they can be identified for further "blackmail"[0] should they actually comply. They typically aren't, actually. Most of the time when you en
772.
by DaSHacka 1y ago
Did NameCheap merely register the domain and are holding onto it, or are they now selling it at a higher price than typical registration (usually ~$12/year for a .com) through their platform?
773.
by DaSHacka 1y ago
Unless you work at the domain registrar in question, or sit between the user and the TLD's authoritative nameservers, how would you possibly see what domains are being queried?
774.
by DaSHacka 1y ago
I love how even though the entire repo is essentially a shitpost, it still uses a CoC. You know, to ensure cordiality in any of the various riveting PRs and discussions.
775.
by DaSHacka 1y ago
What tarrifs would you like to see implemented to achieve this effect, and how would they differ from the current administration's approach that apparently "looked like trump high on meth"?
776.
by DaSHacka 1y ago
Sure, and from the perspective of your countries leaders, they don't appear to agree, seeing as how they haven't banned these companies outright. So objectively, it appears more countries agree with my subjective judgement than no
777.
by DaSHacka 1y ago
GP was the one who specifically mentioned "some kind of tarrif on digital services", I merely responded in kind. The technicalities of whether it's "tax" or "tariff" is irrelevant, in the context they both
778.
by DaSHacka 1y ago
Okay, "subjectively" then.
779.
by DaSHacka 1y ago
Did you intend to reply to GP? I dont believe anything in my comment stated the contrary.
780.
by DaSHacka 1y ago
They objectively are, from the perspective of a country.

More ›