DaSHacka

4 ms·

31.
by DaSHacka 10d ago
Wish the admin never added the SSL redirect, its literally the namesake lol I just want basically captive.apple.com with a shorter domain and the webserver not even listening on port 443 at all. Surprised someone hasn't made this yet,
32.
by DaSHacka 10d ago
I don't think this admin even knows what scraping is. Unless it's "scraping the bottom of the barrel", something they're very familiar with.
33.
by DaSHacka 10d ago
And, most notably, intent . https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/department-justice-a...
34.
by DaSHacka 10d ago
I think that would get into murky water really quickly with the rights holders (/content creators) not exactly being thrilled the Wayback Machine is essentially monetizing their IP behind their back.
35.
by DaSHacka 10d ago
Exactly this archive.org is the more straight-laced archive that doesn't circumvent sites that try to block it, and removes content they deem 'problematic' even if not illegal or requested by the site owner. Meanwhile archive
36.
by DaSHacka 10d ago
The minuscule traffic generated by the wayback machine, which serves to preserve the content for years to come, is completely incomparable to the scrapers that hammer every single href linked on a website.
37.
by DaSHacka 10d ago
Ironically, your framing of the situation is infinitely more disingenuous to push a personal agenda versus anything the archive.today guy did.
38.
by DaSHacka 11d ago
A lawyers wet dream is when a security company.... Finds an issue, does not abuse it, and reports it to the affected party for it to be patched? I feel like people like you are more of a lawyers wet dream, in that they'll happily litig
39.
by DaSHacka 13d ago
So the one orchestrating them would have an even stronger claim to having 'created' something, given its simply a tool?
40.
by DaSHacka 13d ago
I haven't seen people say it's indistinguishable quality, but that it doesn't matter. Quite similar to mass-produced foods in the supermarket, actually. We all know they're not as good as a small batch made by hand by so
41.
by DaSHacka 13d ago
Then do that? At the very least, the presence of more code(/recipes) does not hinder an individual trying to do it themselves.
42.
by DaSHacka 13d ago
You've almost perfectly described Delamain and his side missions from Cyberpunk 2077
43.
by DaSHacka 14d ago
Its the OP's profile picture, edited with a Red Hat fedora.
44.
by DaSHacka 17d ago
Android is getting close, with Google adding desktop support akin to Samsung's Dex when the phone is connected to a dock.
45.
by DaSHacka 18d ago
I only semi-agree with GP; it's trivial for someone who works in Tech to pull it off, but that's really all you need to blow the lid on the whole operation given manufacturers would likely have implemented the same behavior across
46.
by DaSHacka 18d ago
Put a WiFi NIC in monitor mode and see if the TV is connected to another AP based on the 802.11 packets. Or if this theoretical implementation by a manufacturer is using a custom protocol/frequency (very unlikely for a variety of reaso
47.
by DaSHacka 18d ago
How do you think? By broadcasting an open WiFi network and seeing if it connects and requests a DHCP Lease.
48.
by DaSHacka 18d ago
> Don't post generated text or AI-edited text. HN is for conversation between humans. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
49.
by DaSHacka 19d ago
Well yeah, that's kinda the idea, but sometimes it's nice to know what 'the worst' will entail
50.
by DaSHacka 19d ago
At the very least, you can be sure they'll never change the terms of the agreement to be more beneficial for you, though. So just treat it as a best case scenario, knowing that it can get even worse.
51.
by DaSHacka 19d ago
LOL it never ceases to amaze me what people on fringe sides of the internet get worked up over. Actual modern day luddites, it's going to be so hilarious in a couple years from now when they all stop caring about AI and move on to the
52.
by DaSHacka 19d ago
They also don't arbitrarily nuke entire domains (with legal content) from the archive like archive.org does.
53.
by DaSHacka 19d ago
"innocent" is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that statement. Does it change the calculus at all if this "innocent" person was trying to dox the operator for nothing more than satisfying a personal whim?
54.
by DaSHacka 19d ago
Maybe in the eyes of some, but the archive is still up and the operator is not dead to two shots to the back of the head.
55.
by DaSHacka 19d ago
Because if he's being targeted by the feds, he obviously he doesn't want his private information being published by some guy who self-admittedly did it on a whim? Is this really that hard to understand?
56.
by DaSHacka 19d ago
You realize the CIA is nonpartisan, right?
57.
by DaSHacka 21d ago
More like the business tax
58.
by DaSHacka 22d ago
Why would you assume Google, Apple, and defense-oriented agencies like CISA wouldn't also have access to those same models, but using them to fix issues? Its just raising the bar across the board, I don't see how only attackers wo
59.
by DaSHacka 22d ago
Honestly, even as a Linux guy who doesn't use Windows (almost) at all anymore, I trust Microsoft to be generic and corporate in their spying. They'll spy on users usage habits, and likely backdoor their OS for the feds, but they w
60.
by DaSHacka 22d ago
Surprisingly, I've had really good luck with reverse engineering on frontier models (without being part of CVP or similar). It's more the exploit development/PoC that it locks up on, which, as I use `pi`, I just switch the mo

More ›