Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
DSMan195276
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
91.
▲
by
DSMan195276
2y ago
Well that depends on what you're trying to prove. If you think it's a copyright violation to include the articles in the dataset _at all_ then it doesn't even matter if ChatGPT can produce NYT articles, it's a violation
92.
▲
by
DSMan195276
2y ago
Can you really say it can "definitely produce this copyrighted work" if NYT had to try thousands of prompts, some of which included parts of the articles they wanted it to produce? That's my point. I really don't know th
93.
▲
by
DSMan195276
2y ago
You're ignoring the point of what I'm saying though, which is that the required prompt is relevant to determining if ChatGPT itself is the thing violating the copyright. I can probably get ChatGPT to produce any sequence of tokens
94.
▲
by
DSMan195276
2y ago
I'd say there's some merit to that defense. Imagine for example if a website generated itself based on a sequence in Pi - technically all of the NYT is in that 'dataset' and if you tell it to start at the right digit it
95.
▲
by
DSMan195276
2y ago
Right, I didn't want to get into it but definitely using 'ret' "properly" has big performance benefits. My point was just that it won't prevent your code from running, it's not like x86 will trigger an exc
96.
▲
by
DSMan195276
2y ago
In addition to what others said, I'd simply point out that all 'ret' does on x86 is pop an address off the top of the stack and jump to it. It's more of a "helper" than a special instruction and it's use i
97.
▲
by
DSMan195276
2y ago
I would also add, it's not _unreasonable_ to be wary of something when a tool like a virus scan pops up a warning. The jargon used to explain what the executable is doing is gibberish to any 'normal' user, there's no way
98.
▲
by
DSMan195276
2y ago
The odd part to me is that back when I was a kid Chuck E Cheese _did_ have a play area section, with at least a tube climbing thing, ball pit, etc. When I took my daughter there a few years ago though it was nothing but arcade games, and I
99.
▲
by
DSMan195276
2y ago
> These people and orgs need absolute and complete ownership over their own platform. The problem is that it's very hard to justify spending money to accomplish this when Twitter/X/Bluesky/Threads/etc. is offerin
100.
▲
by
DSMan195276
2y ago
I've used "gdb-dashboard" a lot, would recommend it. It's similar to the TUI (though I haven't used the TUI much), but you can pick and choose to display a large variety of information and the colors make the output
101.
▲
by
DSMan195276
2y ago
> And if anything X/Twitter is gaining more relevance in normal peoples' lives, not less, since the acquisition. I'm pretty skeptical of that claim, I know plenty of non-techy people who hardly even know Twitter got rename
102.
▲
by
DSMan195276
2y ago
Yeah I was wondering if it might be LLM generated, it just seems so pointless though. Additionally while the date could obviously be fake, June 2022 is before ChatGPT came out.
103.
▲
by
DSMan195276
2y ago
This article is a bit odd. It does mention the "B" vacuum tube batteries you linked in that Wikipedia page, but B-size batteries are not the same thing. The article kinda mentions this ("voltage range of 45 to 90" vs 1.5
104.
▲
by
DSMan195276
2y ago
Keep in mind that you're wider than the single spot you see from, it's possible for your opponent to see part of you before you can see your opponent at all. Who can see the other first depends on who is farther from the corner, a
105.
▲
by
DSMan195276
2y ago
I guess I just don't really get your point then, it's not like the Linux Kernel or Chromium or Firefox are giant buggy messes that don't work at all. They certainly have bugs but by-and-large they work very well with minimal
106.
▲
by
DSMan195276
2y ago
> protocols, conventions, failsafes, QA teams, etc, etc that are either still hugely difficult to contribute to (Linux kernel, web browsers, etc) To be fair here, I don't think it's reasonable to expect that once you have "
107.
▲
by
DSMan195276
2y ago
I don't think this lock is _guaranteed_ to prevent starvation, it just makes an effort at it. There's only two priority levels and a hard-coded 30 wake-ups required to enter high priority - if waiters were continually joining then
108.
▲
by
DSMan195276
2y ago
> Maybe they are worried they won't be able to get the hatch open again if they can't equalize the pressure again? Well note that they currently keep the hatch to the docking port closed unless they're using it, so that p
109.
▲
by
DSMan195276
2y ago
For GPU emulation, I'm not super knowledgeable but I would think the shaders are a big issue, older systems don't have that problem. Console games come with precompiled shaders and you won't be able to reuse those between AMD
110.
▲
by
DSMan195276
2y ago
Absolutely, it's a silly argument. I knew plenty of people who slaked off in-person, most managers aren't literally standing behind you watching your screen. It's IMO a bad metric anyway, I'll read Reddit, HN, watch Yout
111.
▲
by
DSMan195276
2y ago
I'm a bit late but FWIW Google Authenticator has a QR code export option, it generates a giant QR code (potentially multiple) that contain all the accounts and secrets. It's designed for you to scan into Google Authenticator on an
112.
▲
by
DSMan195276
2y ago
> Then the experiment will have failed, and Rust would get removed. Again, this is about a trial to see how things go. If it’s decided to be made permanent, we’ll see what the policy ends up being. But that’s a discussion for then, not n
113.
▲
by
DSMan195276
2y ago
> This is not the case. The C folks are allowed to break the Rust. The Rust folks are committed to fixing it. I mean sorry but that's just not realistic. What happens to that code if those maintaining the bindings/wrappers sudd
114.
▲
by
DSMan195276
2y ago
I've very casually followed this process (lwn articles, read a few emails) and honestly I feel like this was predictable, the problem is the maintenance cost this places on the maintainers. The kernel is developed as one whole thing, t
115.
▲
by
DSMan195276
2y ago
Yeah they have this incorrect. if you provide `lpApplicationName` and `lpCommandLine` then the application name is not automatically added to the command line string, you have to add it yourself to the string provided as `lpCommandLine`. I
116.
▲
by
DSMan195276
2y ago
Keep in mind GPUs (and the rest of the computer) run on DC, not AC, so there is no phase by the time it comes to your computer. The PSU will step down the AC to the right voltage and then rectify it into DC, and they do that independently s
117.
▲
by
DSMan195276
2y ago
What way is that? Do you think medical research has overall cost more lives than it saved in the last ~20ish years? Obviously nobody is happy this happened, but you haven't proposed an alternative that would clearly be better.
118.
▲
by
DSMan195276
2y ago
> without proper testing What would 'proper testing' look like and how long would it take? That's the real rub here. Ultimately you have to apply such a policy to everything because you won't know what's fraudule
119.
▲
by
DSMan195276
2y ago
Users are still useful for isolation, many daemons on your system are likely running with different UIDs (or could be configured to do so) to increase isolation between them and the rest of the system. Groups are a bit less useful (IMO), bu
120.
▲
by
DSMan195276
2y ago
The plot twist is that Bob is rushing all of his welds and thinks Steve is wasting his time by making them "look good".
More ›