DEADMINCE

9 ms·

61.
by DEADMINCE 2y ago
Nonsense. The other half wants him tried fairly. We just expect he will be convicted because his guilt is more obvious than OJs was.
62.
by DEADMINCE 2y ago
Actually, that's exactly what the judgement allows for.
63.
by DEADMINCE 2y ago
Explain the difference.
64.
by DEADMINCE 2y ago
Nah. Like I said, the changes will sneak up on the gullible while they're waiting for a Red Dawn type scenario. Wasn't ever expecting folks like you to show up on HN to be honest, but everyday you learn something new I guess.
65.
by DEADMINCE 2y ago
> Regardless of what you may believe was "meant to be," we live in the reality of today. It's not a question of what I believe, the fats and argument are outlined in the link previously provided. And if the last few years
66.
by DEADMINCE 2y ago
That isn't remotely true, and this perpetuation of a distortion of what the Second Amendment is actually meant to be for is part of the problem. The real reason you have a Second Amendment is to stop those pesky slaves from rising up a
67.
by DEADMINCE 2y ago
It's no longer unawful for the commander in chief to consider an opponent a threat to the country and have them killed. That's the problem.
68.
by DEADMINCE 2y ago
You disagree? What do you do in a situation where half the population won't take a vaccine during a pandemic because they think Bill Gates is going to track you with microchips? Honestly, what's the solution here other than to wai
69.
by DEADMINCE 2y ago
> Sounds very authoritarian and not democratic at all. It's what we already have, just extended a little. We already limit voting to citizens, and we have mandatory education for age groups and as a prerequisite to do certain profes
70.
by DEADMINCE 2y ago
It was an unsuccessful attempt. Apparently that's enough for you to be cool with it though.
71.
by DEADMINCE 2y ago
> Nothing is wrong with the voters. I don't understand how anyone can genuinely believe that. Half the population has an absolutely astounding and embarrassing level of education, think things like climate change are hoaxes, don&#x2
72.
by DEADMINCE 2y ago
Likewise. Cheers.
73.
by DEADMINCE 2y ago
I was making a point that per the other poster's methodology for evaluating security by vulnerability count, plan 9 would win, and plan 9 also meets the posts arbitrary definition of 'useful', in that it can run a webserver,
74.
by DEADMINCE 2y ago
> No, not enough. The lack of 'both sides' is what got us here. lol, why are you going out of your way to reply to this? It's not in my comment, and it wasn't in the comment when you logged in to reply. Did you copy a
75.
by DEADMINCE 2y ago
> And the other half wholeheartedly endorses convicting a certain candidate of something, anything to keep him out of office. There's a strong argument that the candidate in question shouldn't be in the position he was in is be
76.
by DEADMINCE 2y ago
And the left has no issue with him being tried, convicted and held accountable.
77.
by DEADMINCE 2y ago
> Out of context this is quite reasonable and level headed. In context of the hyper partisan landscape US politics are today, doesn’t seem likely without a supermajority opposition to be able to bring charges against a president, In cont
78.
by DEADMINCE 2y ago
> I'm not sure that's fair; It's the way most distros handled security vulnerabilities, though. Without looking, I'm certain Ubuntu has a security advisory for that vulnerability. So I agree it might not be fair on th
79.
by DEADMINCE 2y ago
> I don't know who "we" are. We are the people having this discussion. That should be obvious. It's kind of funny you accused me of pretending to be baffled, lol. The irony. You certainly had no issue discussing thi
80.
by DEADMINCE 2y ago
> Because ML engineers also want version control and easy history and rollbacks and pull requests with code reviews for model changes. That's not an answer so much as an excuse. > There is no tool that does that except for the ve
81.
by DEADMINCE 2y ago
> And you don't actually pentest the software which those users on the windows machine are using on the Linux systems? You really love your assumptions, huh? > it's just a "well, I got access, nothing more to see!"
82.
by DEADMINCE 2y ago
Instead of taking the time to reply 'huh' multiple times, you should make sure you read what you're replying to. For example: > Huh? Exploiting an unpatched vulnerability on a server to get access to a user account is.. ve
83.
by DEADMINCE 2y ago
> Not at all. I clearly underlined that I'm not looking for cases fitting that specific scenario The thing is, we're trying to talk about the security of OpenBSD compared to its competition. But you're trying to avoid lett
84.
by DEADMINCE 2y ago
> Do you never end up having to privesc in your pentests on linux systems? Of course I do. I'm not saying privsec isn't useful, I'm saying the cases where you will ssh to localhost to get root are very rare. Maybe you test
85.
by DEADMINCE 2y ago
> Think “illegitimate” access to www-data. I get the point. My point was the example being given is less than 1% of affected cases. > It’s very common on linux pentests to need to privesc from some lower-privileged foothold Sure. Been
86.
by DEADMINCE 2y ago
> I mean useful, though through the lens of my usecases Better to stick to standard definitions in the future so you won't have to explain your personal definitions later on. > No, I think your examples were excellent for illustr
87.
by DEADMINCE 2y ago
> It's going to apply to the amount of servers that an attacker has low-privileged access (think: www-data) and an unpatched sshd. Right, which is almost none. www-data should be set to noshell 99% of the time. > or just locally
88.
by DEADMINCE 2y ago
Any vulns in any package in OpenBSD's package repositories that they audited should count as a vuln against OpenBSD itself. If OpenBSD users installed it through OpenBSD repositories and are running it will they be affected? Yes? Then
89.
by DEADMINCE 2y ago
> Would you like to point to one that successfully utilizes a weakness in OpenBSD itself, which is the topic and implied statement of the video, rather than a weakness in some application running under the superuser? I'm sorry, what
90.
by DEADMINCE 2y ago
> Okay, let's say if you know something useful with a better record. Oh, SEL4 is without any doubt useful , it wouldn't be as popular and coveted if it wasn't, but I think you are trying to say widespread . However, you

More ›