D9u

90 ms·

781.
by D9u 14y ago
The OP should Google "@viewport" so his site can be accessible to mobile devices.
782.
by D9u 14y ago
Site Not mobile accessible. (Android 2.2.x)
783.
by D9u 14y ago
I don't have $50. I don't use twitter. I won't even login to Facebook anymore. Thus I lol'd at this.
784.
by D9u 14y ago
Lubuntu (LXDE) is another good option. It's another minimalist approach. Runs well on my netbook, but I prefer Fedora's LXDE "spin."
785.
by D9u 14y ago
I'm another netbook user on a slow connection, and I've never cared for GNOME (since Breezy Badger), for various reasons, so when I found out about Xfce I was quite pleased with it. I like that some distros provide different "spins" as Fedo
786.
by D9u 14y ago
As I've previously mentioned, cave darkness is completely black, and natural.
787.
by D9u 14y ago
While the article is well presented, and contains many good points, I must take issue with a few of the ideas set forth. 1.) I'm not taking "design tips" from someone whose site takes so long to load on a slow connection. 2.) Obviously the
788.
by D9u 14y ago
Since your website fails to scale down to fit on mobile devices, yet claims to have mobile apps in the portfolio, one has to wonder how many other oversights the developer has failed to consider. The failure to target the vast emerging mob
789.
by D9u 14y ago
The OP is "wmpowerusers.com" (Windoze Mobile Power Users) yet the site doesn't even scale to my mobile device? Someone needs to clue in on "viewport" either in meta or CSS. That said, I don't see this as a newsworthy item. It's more of a cr
790.
by D9u 14y ago
http://ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html