Cycl0ps

10 ms·

61.
by Cycl0ps 5y ago
The Darknet Diaries podcast just released an episode on a similar attack (via MSP) if you're interested in hearing what this looks like from a remidiation standpoint
62.
by Cycl0ps 5y ago
All fair points. I do want to point out that "Chamomile Essential Oil Infused Aromatherapy Room Spray with Gemstones" is how this all started. When the cannabinoid system was brought up, it was done in relation to that. I had no
63.
by Cycl0ps 5y ago
"A phone with an ultralow SAR value,if you want to minimise your mobile radiation exposure." bunk. "Pure’s screen doesn't emit blue light directly into your eyes. Most smartphones dazzle us with a direct frontlight, wher
64.
by Cycl0ps 5y ago
Thank you
65.
by Cycl0ps 5y ago
Then you should simply correct them with evidence
66.
by Cycl0ps 5y ago
See also, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law
67.
by Cycl0ps 5y ago
No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be held liable on account of— (A) any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, l
68.
by Cycl0ps 5y ago
I can agree with you, but the issue is that this isn't an academic discussion on the merits of thorough vaccine trials. Here's the third verse: "Let’s go, Brandon, we know he cappin’ Patriots out in the street takin’ action H
69.
by Cycl0ps 5y ago
They're more than allowed to say it, YouTube is equally allowed to not repeat it.
70.
by Cycl0ps 5y ago
"Hey man, I've been locked inside my dorm for the past week studying and I'm starting to go stir-crazy. Anything cool going on tonight?"
71.
by Cycl0ps 5y ago
" No rule is better than bad rule " may be closer to my argument, though it dips further into anarchy than I'd like. People are welcome to try as they like, but governments aren't people. If Facebook wanted to try some
72.
by Cycl0ps 5y ago
If someone can figure it out I'd love to see it. Having some way of preventing someone from making more than one account would be a tremendous help in my eyes. Whether you use your name or not, that account is you. If it gets removed,
73.
by Cycl0ps 5y ago
I agree with that. My concern, and what I assume is the concern of others, is that those putting these regulations in place would have neither the knowledge or intentions to consider that nuance. Considering that nuance myself, I don't
74.
by Cycl0ps 5y ago
It's an interesting idea. The first image I got had seven tags, including 'handrail' 'bannister' and 'railing'. Similar words seem like they'd be hard to guess, as I'd need to spend additional tr
75.
by Cycl0ps 5y ago
For me it's becoming less about owning something and more about just finding it. Streaming services have fragmented and they each have some flagship show or series locked to their platform. At this point we're back to premium cab
76.
by Cycl0ps 5y ago
I like Dang's comments on the idea that the presentation of the information is just as valuable as the information itself. Much like your round Earth example, sometimes stating the objective truth isn't enough to win over an audie
77.
by Cycl0ps 5y ago
People always disagree. Do you know many people there are? I don't think there's anything people agree on. On your second point, are you interested in my safety or your comfort? Because I feel pretty safe right now.
78.
by Cycl0ps 5y ago
322 cases in about 50 years. 69 fatal. That's in the US, but compare to UK birthrates which has seen over 25'000'000 births in that time. These deaths aren't prevented by regulation, they're prevented by parenting
79.
by Cycl0ps 5y ago
They were
80.
by Cycl0ps 5y ago
I don't really get the image it redirects to, but the website does have information on leaks. https://sizeof.cat/post/twitch-leaks/
81.
by Cycl0ps 5y ago
You can skip submitting a phone number. They don't make it obvious but an option to skip is there at sign up. Though from personal experience it may make the moderation system more aggressive towards your account.
82.
by Cycl0ps 5y ago
Reading through the comments it seems those right two logos are the best solution we have. We need a way to quickly identify speed and power ratings per cable. Users might benefit more from simplifying further down to something like color
83.
by Cycl0ps 5y ago
I don't think that's as big a problem for white-collar workers as it is for blue-collar. Processing paperwork, managing a team, calculating risk, these are all things that readily translate to new fields, as opposed to something l
84.
by Cycl0ps 5y ago
Don't have 20 mins to read through but I get the gist. The main argument I'm seeing is that raising atmospheric carbon levels is still problematic. That's true, but I think the article is neglecting the source of the carbon
85.
by Cycl0ps 5y ago
DEA raiding dispensaries has been a thing since CA first legalized marijuana. I'm not local but it looks like it was ruled in federal court that the DEA isn't authorized to raid a business operating within state law. Not sure how
86.
by Cycl0ps 5y ago
Where did you even come from? Absolutely nothing to with my comment, the comment above mine, or the one above that. I'm talking about helmets and issues in how Loyola cites their sources, not the effects of the Vietnam war on domestic
87.
by Cycl0ps 5y ago
You're right. See my other comment in this thread but it seems like Loyola changed the quote where it initially said 'military-style'. Personally the helmet reminded me of helmets worn in Vietnam but they definitely do not ma
88.
by Cycl0ps 5y ago
Well, it's straight from a citation from Loyola Law School. Following the citation takes us to Maya Lau's article titled, "Inked with a skull in a cowboy hat, L.A. County sheriff’s deputy describes exclusive society of lawmen
89.
by Cycl0ps 5y ago
I disagree. If income was paid out Reddit would then be sending out 1090s or W2s to every mod. Analytics and time tracking would be put in place. An entire team would need to be stood up to oversee mod management. Mods from certain regions
90.
by Cycl0ps 5y ago
Anyone who sincerely believes any story starting with "$Group not $X because $Y" is part of the problem.

More ›