CriticalCathed

25 ms·

1. 211.▲
   by CriticalCathed 7y ago

   So, if you can tie this information that you receive from Google to a particular person then wouldn't this violate the spirit of the law? Similar to the way precursor chemicals are illegal or tightly controlled in drug law.
2. 212.▲
   by CriticalCathed 7y ago

   We're already off to a great start with your post. Thank you for your service.
3. 213.▲
   by CriticalCathed 7y ago

   That's the reason they gave, but the reality is probably that it's no longer politically expedient to keep him.
4. 214.▲
   by CriticalCathed 7y ago

   You mean the guy who told people autopilot had trouble in that spot, repeatedly, and then negligently caused his own death by not paying attention in that very same spot? No one deserves to die, but he is responsible for his own death.
5. 215.▲
   by CriticalCathed 7y ago

   Since you appear to know some about UBER: What is UBER spending money on? They don't own the cars, they skim off of drivers. I presume the only costs they should have are infrastructure maintenance, software development, and insurance
6. 216.▲
   by CriticalCathed 7y ago

   Would grafting help?
7. 217.▲
   by CriticalCathed 7y ago

   Probably no different than a crack.
8. 218.▲
   by CriticalCathed 7y ago

   When can we say that the City is committing a criminal offense?
9. 219.▲
   by CriticalCathed 7y ago

   This is going to be a shock to all of those people who were willing to give tax incentives for Amazon to build distribution warehouses in their city in exchange for "jobs." Though, this is only the beginning. A few thousand jobs n
10. 220.▲
    by CriticalCathed 7y ago

    I would apologize for putting my name on the work of an intern. Either they're lying and they were fully aware of the work being fabricated, or they were so uninvolved with the processing of the photographs that they had no idea they w
11. 221.▲
    by CriticalCathed 7y ago

    I'm always skeptical of the veracity of these articles. This one doesn't pass the sniff test. It has a narrative arc that doesn't recall reality. Seems contrived. The thing that rang truest was the school interaction. That&#x
12. 222.▲
    by CriticalCathed 7y ago

    NatGeo's writers don't understand what it is they are writing about. The significant fact here isn't that "the ocean will shrink," but that this discovery is potentially useful for understanding how subduction zones
13. 223.▲
    by CriticalCathed 7y ago

    I was just about to upgrade my home with Nest products. The other alternative I was looking into looks much more attractive now. I wonder if this was about money, control, or developer resources? What's the upshot for them?
14. 224.▲
    by CriticalCathed 7y ago

    If hovering counts as user interaction...
15. 225.▲
    by CriticalCathed 7y ago

    So many people here have hardons for tesla hate. The guy fucked up, bad. Tesla is not at fault here. >"According to the family, Mr. Huang was well aware that Autopilot was not perfect and, specifically, he told them it was not relia
16. 226.▲
    by CriticalCathed 7y ago

    Would the idea of a flatlander being incapable of comprehending 3-space be similar to what you're thinking?
17. 227.▲
    by CriticalCathed 7y ago

    This is really fucking cool.
18. 228.▲
    by CriticalCathed 7y ago

    It is a shame that the Apple Walled Garden prevents customers from being able to purchase and use the software that they want. Seems inefficient. And potentially anti-competitive. >Spotify complained to European regulators last month tha
19. 229.▲
    by CriticalCathed 7y ago

    I think you're misinterpreting him. He doesn't say that it's not a bad thing, or that it's a hoax. He simply says that the US does the same thing abroad and it's hypocritical to not care about that part of it.
20. 230.▲
    by CriticalCathed 7y ago

    Act how? What precisely could be done outside of protectionist policies that seem to be regarded as outmoded, inefficient, and taboo. Are we going to war? Isolationism? React in kind? Simply wait?