CrimsonRain

6 ms·

91.
by CrimsonRain 3mo ago
That's like saying let's stay with horses. We'll develop faster and better tech. We'll find resources to feed that. Use that to build better. Access better resources. We'll mine asteroids. We'll harness much mo
92.
by CrimsonRain 3mo ago
A lot of hypotheticals, conjecture, speculation, personal feels devoid of any facts. That somehow kills the project. ok!
93.
by CrimsonRain 3mo ago
None of that is needed. Nobody benefits from all that time wasting bureaucracy/corpo speak. Bun is quick to deliver new features and bug fixes. With this change, the hope is that'll only get faster. All those PRs can be fed thru C
94.
by CrimsonRain 3mo ago
And GP is full of shit as the main branch is the v1.4.0. it is not "released" yet as it is not finished. It is available as canary version.
95.
by CrimsonRain 3mo ago
Bun became a thing because it provided some specific benefit to js ecosystem. Zig enabled the rapid development. The people who contributed were definitely helpful but they can still choose to help or not and new people will step up too
96.
by CrimsonRain 3mo ago
That's just like your opinion...? More power to Jared (and anyone else) if they can "vibe code" useful projects like bun.
97.
by CrimsonRain 3mo ago
What a load of bs. > Inevitable collapse According to who? You? The well ackshually guy? > Low in trust before acquisition Cite your sources. > Unreleased version v140 is the canary version which has been available for a long time.
98.
by CrimsonRain 3mo ago
Update firmware. Turn off LIVE PLUS block internet for the tv from router Enjoy. That's what I have been doing for years.
99.
by CrimsonRain 3mo ago
So the whole world needs to pay (spend more) to accommodate to your problem? What next? You don't have legs so everyone around you must carry you? Look, the goal is not to make things accessible. The goal is, out of generosity of the s
100.
by CrimsonRain 3mo ago
A. Any decent ones are more than good enough to provide content in an accessible way. B. Like you accept the risk of running scripts? Or getting zero day thru your browser? Ridiculous. Sandbox it. C. Local LLM is enough. Nothing needs to go
101.
by CrimsonRain 3mo ago
has it occurred to you some (from the amount of demand, a lot) people actually want to buy it because of that?
102.
by CrimsonRain 3mo ago
What is he doing with all that wealth? Taking lavish vacations? Buying luxurious yacht? Buying islands and making bunkers?
103.
by CrimsonRain 3mo ago
Excellent response. I said it before, forcing the responsibility of making thing accessible on the world makes no sense now (made sense before though). Just use an AI to interact with the app/website; it can provide whatever sort of ac
104.
by CrimsonRain 3mo ago
Why not all factories? And hospitals? Schools? Offices?
105.
by CrimsonRain 3mo ago
So where were you in last 20 years asking for tax on DCs?
106.
by CrimsonRain 3mo ago
DCs do much more than AI. AI companies are already paying tax.
107.
by CrimsonRain 3mo ago
Has nothing to do with taxing dc. Sue them for pollution/hazard. So raise the prices? Build more capacity? If you elect politician who can't plan ahead for a simple thing as electricity grid capacity...who's to blame?
108.
by CrimsonRain 3mo ago
Data is there. Bundle it up in torrent and let community handle it. Cheaper than current system.
109.
by CrimsonRain 3mo ago
How? If you don't believe in ai/nv etc, just invest in things unrelated. When the "ai circular bubble" bursts, you'll be rich!! Invest in the companies you believe in. Invest long term. Don't cry about bubbles
110.
by CrimsonRain 3mo ago
You're just being pedantic. To a sufficient advanced being (eg God), the whole universe is rational/calculable/etc. Are you the type who says "you're wrong! It's 9:01" when someone says it's 9?
111.
by CrimsonRain 3mo ago
Requests from outside of eu, the requester should pay the full cost of compilation and then some. Why not make those emails public to begin with? There's no need to compile/publish if all data is public to begin with.
112.
by CrimsonRain 3mo ago
That's your interpretation after being used to high level languages. The assembly purists were not happy back in the days and made the same/similar arguments.
113.
by CrimsonRain 3mo ago
How about keeping the information public from start so a request is not even needed?
114.
by CrimsonRain 3mo ago
Why do data centers need to be taxed separately? Why does the local community need their take from that economic activity? What are they even providing? Are they providing land, electricity, and hardware for free to the data center?
115.
by CrimsonRain 3mo ago
The problem with your argument is that it's the same argument machine coders used against high level languages :)
116.
by CrimsonRain 3mo ago
That's such a bad take. You mention some good things they need to do but ignore the part that those are next steps and will take time. You are acting like they need to complete everything at once...why? Bun (rust) is not even released
117.
by CrimsonRain 3mo ago
i think you are talking about hindenburg research center
118.
by CrimsonRain 3mo ago
You are not completely wrong but you are missing out a lot too. It is accountability without authority issue. Yes, learning to navigate working with other people is important. But why are you learning that? Because you will need that in wor
119.
by CrimsonRain 3mo ago
idc how market goes. my bag is hold for 15 years. A crash is just another chance of buying more.
120.
by CrimsonRain 3mo ago
Market is _never_ rational. If market followed rational logic, you could pre-calculate which stocks will be what price and never lose money. (Stock) market is, by definition, irrational. If you are scared of solvency, sell and hold money an

More ›