Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
CoryG89
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
17 ms
·
151.
▲
by
CoryG89
10y ago
There aren't many good studies in the US precisely because of it's scheduling under the DEA. But serotonin levels are definitely restored. Most estimates range anywhere from a few days to six weeks before serotonin levels are full
152.
▲
by
CoryG89
10y ago
Not according to the graph or the study. Source? Toxicity is not the only measure for physical harm.
153.
▲
by
CoryG89
10y ago
Perhaps. Personally if I drew the graph, I would put MDMA and cannabis closer together in terms of physical harm. I think they are dangerous in different ways and it's difficult to say which is more dangerous in absolute terms. Like yo
154.
▲
by
CoryG89
10y ago
> Caffeine is debatable, because for many people it's not about recreation, it's more about giving you that extra kick so that you're more productive. Oh, how many times I've heard the same thing, except referring to
155.
▲
by
CoryG89
10y ago
This is incredibly naive. You are much better off testing any substance you put into your body. Whether you test it yourself, or can confirm that a trusted party has tested it. What if your reliable supplier was sold cyanide from an unrelia
156.
▲
by
CoryG89
10y ago
Note that you need a very accurate scale (measures down to the milligram) to accurately measure dosage for this substance. Please make sure you don't take too much. It is impossible to measure by eye.
157.
▲
by
CoryG89
10y ago
No one has ever died directly from an MDMA overdose (as far as I know). Yes there have been indirect deaths usually from over-hydration (which causes the brain to swell, with or without MDMA), which usually happens in a rave/dance sett
158.
▲
by
CoryG89
10y ago
You're right. Although I am much more likely to trust someone who has had significant experience with both (especially if they have also managed to become a doctor or something similar). I don't have much information, but based on
159.
▲
by
CoryG89
10y ago
Absolutely. I did not mean to imply that the results are lab grade quality. To clarify, by "pure MDMA", I did not mean that the substance is 100℅ pure MDMA, but rather that it does not contain other active adulterants. With reagen
160.
▲
by
CoryG89
10y ago
> If you label all borrowers who can't pay back their loans as "victims", wouldn't that make the practice of lending itself immoral? No. It is only immoral to knowingly lend to someone who can't and won't be
161.
▲
by
CoryG89
10y ago
If you become disabled, then you do get the opportunity to receive subsidized help in the form of disability.
162.
▲
by
CoryG89
10y ago
As some others have said, it all depends on how the debt is forgiven. If the government uses tax payer money to repay the loans, then you are correct. If the government makes universities and/or loan providers eat the cost in cases whe
163.
▲
by
CoryG89
10y ago
I feel that the first chart/plot on this wiki gives a pretty good estimate on the relative potentials for abuse of various drugs. Note the relative positions of Ecstasy, Cannabis, and Heroin: https://en.wikipedia.org/wi
164.
▲
by
CoryG89
10y ago
The sad truth is that some kids don't have parents. The fact that they need to take out a loan at all suggests that their parents (if they have any) may not be very experienced at making much money themselves. Loan forgiveness should n
165.
▲
by
CoryG89
10y ago
You feel cheated that you understand debt enough not to be taken advantage of? Seems like a silly thing to be upset about. Perhaps we also shouldn't rescue someone who falls into an open man-hole, because it isn't fair to those of
166.
▲
by
CoryG89
10y ago
The problem is a university and/or loan provider who is only interested in your money (and doesn't fear their loans being forgiven) has an incentive to mislead kids into thinking that this is not irresponsible. Not everyone is as
167.
▲
by
CoryG89
10y ago
> Taking out a loan you don't realistically have the capacity to pay back is irresponsible. The loan provider is in a much better position to know who will and will not be able to pay back a particular loan. > If you want to fix
168.
▲
by
CoryG89
10y ago
If you were mislead by the bank about the value (or future value) of the house, then perhaps that loan should be (at least partially) forgiven as well. It is also the responsibility of the party giving a loan to ensure that the borrower wil
169.
▲
by
CoryG89
10y ago
Yes, or perhaps just people who were mislead by universities and/or student loan providers.
170.
▲
by
CoryG89
10y ago
Then you are not the target for student loan forgiveness. It is meant for those who took a loan on the premise that they would be able to get a job that allowed them to pay back the loan. This is not the case for a large portion of college
171.
▲
by
CoryG89
10y ago
I was able to access a readable version through the "web" link. First Google result for me.
172.
▲
by
CoryG89
10y ago
Perhaps you have to take a test designed to measure self control before being allowed access to addictive drugs? I think many of these dangers would be much smaller if we had a better educated public when it comes to the differences and spe
173.
▲
by
CoryG89
10y ago
True in the sense that pure MDMA cannot be pressed into a solid tablet alone. It needs to be mixed with fillers/binders to be pressed into a pill and stick together. However, you can find Ecstasy pills that contain nothing but MDMA and
174.
▲
by
CoryG89
10y ago
MDMA (or Molly) usually comes as a cloudy off white crystal or crystalline powder (if broken up). Ecstasy comes as a pressed pill (presumably containing some MDMA, with the possibility of other drugs/adulterants and fillers). The only
175.
▲
by
CoryG89
10y ago
I tend to agree, but I don't think a society should treat all drugs the same. Opiates and crack cocaine are much more dangerous, than say pot or MDMA. If we legalize everything, we need much better drug education in schools. Let's
176.
▲
by
CoryG89
10y ago
The fact that one of the doctors in the article compares the dangers to opioids is misleading or misguided. MDMA has an exceptionally small potential for long term abuse when compared to most other drugs. Despite having studied brain damage
177.
▲
by
CoryG89
10y ago
I agree that it makes sense for a journalist in the sense that many people do not know what MDMA is, but they have heard of Ecstasy. However, Ecstasy does have negative connotations that pure MDMA does not. The risk of unknown adulterants i
178.
▲
by
CoryG89
10y ago
I am not sure I agree that optimizing for laziness will ever be a skill. But indeed, I am not sure it's possible to know everything there is to know about just about anything . How can you ever be sure there isn't still something
179.
▲
by
CoryG89
10y ago
In hindsight of course it's obvious. jQuery should just have been built-in from the beginning! And all browsers should have always behaved the same and should never break compatibility with never versions. Then jQuery would never have
180.
▲
by
CoryG89
10y ago
Seems doubtful that the founding fathers and revolutionists thought their "oaths" to the crown meant much either. I don't want to join any empire, but I would advocate for globalism, which I don't believe is the same thi
More ›