CorvusCrypto

20 ms·

1. 181.▲
   by CorvusCrypto 10y ago

   agree. You have to wonder if these articles come up as a way to draw people in to looking back at the theory to justify their use. A sort of "trolling" to get people back on board thinking of the theory and not just the use. Both
2. 182.▲
   by CorvusCrypto 10y ago

   Great writeup. I think this should go hand in hand with articles explaining why p <= 0.05 is not an end-all be-all confirmation of your hypotheses/conclusions. Before I jumped to the software engineering world, I did biostats and wa
3. 183.▲
   by CorvusCrypto 10y ago

   "If this interpretation of the data is correct, then aging is a natural process that can be reduced to nanoscale thermal physics" - this was utter crap. No wonder this guy is at a liberal arts college. You can't equate atomic
4. 184.▲
   by CorvusCrypto 10y ago

   I feel like this can be argued so many ways. For instance, while code review might block some changes from being introduced into the system, it also does have more benefits than the "fluffy" ones you mentioned. Maybe an engineer t
5. 185.▲
   Should you use DAOs these days and when is it appropriate?

   2 points by CorvusCrypto 11y ago|0 comments