Copenjin

11 ms·

91.
by Copenjin 2y ago
The scenario NEVER comes up in the future as it was originally expected. You'll end up having to remove and refactor a lot of code. Abstractions are useful only used sparingly and when they don't account for handling something tha
92.
by Copenjin 2y ago
You just need to work on one project built by someone that implemented Uncle Bob recommendations blindly when the books came out to know how much they are worth. There were some low hanging fruits to pick at the time regarding trying to be
93.
by Copenjin 2y ago
Yes, thinking the same thing here.
94.
by Copenjin 2y ago
Very good, Code is extremely nice but as others have said, if you let it go on its own it burns through your money pretty fast. I've made it build a web scraper from scratch, figuring out the "API" of a website using a projec
95.
by Copenjin 2y ago
8Gb of ram, for those wondering.
96.
by Copenjin 2y ago
Dear bufferoveflow, I didn't refer to any conspiracy and didn't talk about numbers but about silly conclusions. and I'm not "victimizing" for internet downvotes that just say something about the maturity of those wh
97.
by Copenjin 2y ago
Again, I'm not american but I'm well aware of the silly stuff you are being fed to by influencers selling male victimhood content. Stop listening to that crap. Your downvotes will not change anything. As someone else said, the on
98.
by Copenjin 2y ago
It's a global tendency, even if the effects are slightly different.
99.
by Copenjin 2y ago
Exactly, this is one of the actual problems.
100.
by Copenjin 2y ago
What did I just read. I'm not american but I doubt that this is the actual reality you guys live in. Feels like you watch too many of the wrong youtube influencers.
101.
by Copenjin 2y ago
It depends on the ToS they had at the time, when they started they explicitly had protections (privacy, data handling) only for US customers pointing to some local law, no details on how the data and samples from outside the us would have b
102.
by Copenjin 2y ago
Outrage for this? Really?
103.
by Copenjin 2y ago
Exactly.
104.
by Copenjin 2y ago
The question is not completely useless if the interviewer does not expect to receive in any case an answer that shows how much cool aid has been absorbed. Most companies are just that, a place to work and earn some money, regardless of how
105.
by Copenjin 2y ago
Not best Korea anymore.
106.
by Copenjin 2y ago
I've yet to see the numbers you list live, but in addition to pure uptime, I've seen a lot of instances where it has been used as the default communication channel instead of proper RPCs, with devastating effects on the long run f
107.
by Copenjin 2y ago
I really hope that people are slowly starting to understand that using kafka and turning it in a single point of failure (yes, it fails) of your architecture is not a good idea. This pattern has it's uses, but if you are using it every
108.
by Copenjin 2y ago
Thanks.
109.
by Copenjin 2y ago
No, GT/s is not, regardless of the downvotes, please point me to the standard that defines them if I'm wrong. Let's keep using the boring GB/s since we are still talking about data.
110.
by Copenjin 2y ago
Very nice and well executed idea, but I think that in many cases this could be overestimating the competence of the attacker.
111.
by Copenjin 2y ago
At this point, I hope this is well known.
112.
by Copenjin 2y ago
Can't they use proper units? I refuse to even read this.
113.
by Copenjin 2y ago
> In the past 3 years or so they have repeatedly proven that to be a lie; they weren’t able to have their cake and eat it too. Yeah, this is what I was referring to, not sure about the reputation but they are still popular, that's f
114.
by Copenjin 2y ago
Respected by who?
115.
by Copenjin 2y ago
Feel free to post those playlists for those discouraged by the list of academic resources :)
116.
by Copenjin 2y ago
> because mastering the use of these tools is an important skill like Personal opinion. > if they show they are proficient with Copilot or whatever AI-based tool then it's also a valuable skill that you should have in mind when
117.
by Copenjin 2y ago
You can do point 2 alone, skipping the nonsense of point 1. Please respect the time of the people that are interviewing and don't push your "innovative" ideas about interviewing on them. You are interviewing, not doing experi
118.
by Copenjin 2y ago
If they interview for someone able to solve leetcode hards on the spot, that's what they will get. I hope for them that they they don't focus on this (j/k, we already know that some do).
119.
by Copenjin 2y ago
The objective is not finding someone good at reviews, or even that gets a specific review "right". It's having a chance to understand how someone thinks, better evaluate their actual knowledge and test for some important red
120.
by Copenjin 2y ago
I've been doing this for more than a decade, can confirm that it gives very high quality signals.

More ›