CookieCrisp

4 ms·

1. 31.▲
   by CookieCrisp 3mo ago

   These days anytime I want an extension I'm just asking Claude to build it. Has no problem knocking them out. I'm pretty certain Claude could have built any of these features in the malicious extensions in one shot
2. 32.▲
   by CookieCrisp 3mo ago

   If it's valuable enough to someone, and it isn't keeping up, someone will pay. If it's not valuable enough for someone to pay, then who cares?
3. 33.▲
   by CookieCrisp 3mo ago

   I don’t trust this was the result of a normal prompt
4. 34.▲
   by CookieCrisp 3mo ago

   Which would make sense if they chose strategies that might stop that from happening. Instead the ones I know refuse to even learn what AI can do and refuse to see that they're not going to slow it's adoption down by sealing themse
5. 35.▲
   by CookieCrisp 3mo ago

   You do not represent everyone
6. 36.▲
   by CookieCrisp 3mo ago

   I think there are many valid reasons to be against them - I think a lot of them are more right than wrong. It’s the “It can’t really do much” that I think must be from people that haven’t really tried it.
7. 37.▲
   by CookieCrisp 3mo ago

   Ideas and functionality beget more ideas and functionality
8. 38.▲
   by CookieCrisp 3mo ago

   This argument feels like A: The sky is blue! B: No it's not. A: Yes, it is, please look up. B: No, you must prove it to me through reason. A: But, if you would just pretty please look up. B: No. I run a company, I've been running
9. 39.▲
   by CookieCrisp 3mo ago

   Very very fast steam rollers.
10. 40.▲
    by CookieCrisp 4mo ago

    Plus, if you're black hat utilizing prompt injection or a living, you're probably unlikely to have been willing to share your methods in this test. This is likely made up mostly of people testing that are not experts in prompt inj
11. 41.▲
    by CookieCrisp 4mo ago

    Makes sense to me that it wouldn’t. You’re effectively saying you’re willing to trade future use for priority access now. Of course they’re going to use that to reach a more favorable price tradeoff for themselves
12. 42.▲
    by CookieCrisp 4mo ago

    Isn't that effectively what they've done in regards to chinese cars?
13. 43.▲
    by CookieCrisp 4mo ago

    Seems like a booby trap to me, which is illegal. I suspect if one of these does enough damage there will be laws against it. The intent was to destroy - still I sympathize with the desire to have their terms followed, and I think this situa
14. 44.▲
    by CookieCrisp 4mo ago

    There is plenty of work that does not need to be perfectly verified, because the risk is controlled. Prototyping a javascript game for example. Or code that runs just on your local machine where good enough is good enough. I'm sure a l
15. 45.▲
    by CookieCrisp 4mo ago

    This would be like someone 40 years ago asking who Donald Trump is. It may not effect you yet but it likely will someday. Ignoring these people does not seem to help them go away
16. 46.▲
    by CookieCrisp 4mo ago

    What part is wrong?
17. 47.▲
    by CookieCrisp 6mo ago

    We’re so close guys! Another 25 years and we might almost be there!
18. 48.▲
    by CookieCrisp 11mo ago

    I’d rather not rely on a government owning it that has been very open about their desire to control what people perceive as true
19. 49.▲
    by CookieCrisp 2y ago

    I’ve had what was told to me is a 10, you don’t always pass out, unfortunately
20. 50.▲
    by CookieCrisp 2y ago

    My understanding of the heart rate correlation to lifespan between different species is that it is “within a couple levels of magnitude” and that an increase of 10% in a human’s rate does not correlate at all to a 10% decrease in lifespan
21. 51.▲
    by CookieCrisp 2y ago

    I feel like that example is missing some context - if signups did increase then their experiment was successful - we aren’t here to make pretty pages, we’re here to make money.
22. 52.▲
    by CookieCrisp 2y ago

    Which explains why professionals have so eagerly adopted it over the last two decades
23. 53.▲
    by CookieCrisp 2y ago

    I agree, an example that if you say something dumb with enough confidence a lot of people will think it's smart.
24. 54.▲
    by CookieCrisp 2y ago

    I would be a bit more paranoid about that then you seem to be
25. 55.▲
    by CookieCrisp 2y ago

    The barbarians are at the gate. I heard my whole life how my generation was going to be useless too. Ruined by arcades and violent tv shows. I am not saying there aren’t going to be drawbacks but “5 second attention span” sounds like the sa
26. 56.▲
    by CookieCrisp 2y ago

    Well it is a good thing that nothing like that happened then, isn’t it?
27. 57.▲
    by CookieCrisp 3y ago

    I am pretty sure they intended the butt of the joke to be intentionally themselves
28. 58.▲
    by CookieCrisp 3y ago

    I think for small amounts of text there's no way around it being indistinguishable to a machine and not distinguishable to a human. There just aren't that many combinations of words that still flow well. Furthermore as more and mo
29. 59.▲
    by CookieCrisp 3y ago

    I made the same "mistake" this person did. Companies didn't reward me. But you know what? I kept improving, they didn't, and I was eventually able to launch my own company while they stay stuck in that job. Obviously com
30. 60.▲
    by CookieCrisp 3y ago

    I'm fine with talking to them now - I don't personally find your argument very compelling; there is almost always a step further that someone wont consider that someone else will think is obvious.