Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Cogito
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
84 ms
·
631.
▲
by
Cogito
13y ago
From [0]: Let X be a random variable and g be any function. If X is continuous, then the expectation of g(X) is defined as, E[g(X)] = \int_−∞^∞ g(x)f(x) dx, where f is the probability density function of X. --- For us, with mean 3 and sigma
632.
▲
by
Cogito
13y ago
They use the term 'observe', which typically means to shoot photons or electrons at it. A laser is a common option. This is a pretty reasonable use of the term, as when most people observe anything it's typically by capturing
633.
▲
by
Cogito
13y ago
From the linked paper [0], from the description of figure 2 on page 2, it appears as if the "enclosure, flexible nozzle and gimbal structures" are all 3D printed. The description of how they empirically found a good nozzle shape a
634.
▲
by
Cogito
13y ago
To be fair to Jeff, he was quoting from "Facts and Fallacies of Software Engineering" by Robert Glass [0]. The two rules are very similar, and that's why I think they have the same 'theme'. In one we are talking abo
635.
▲
by
Cogito
13y ago
At first I thought this might have been a repost of some refactoring advice I heard of long ago. A quick google finds a reference on wikipedia [0]. Essentially it goes like this: The first time you implement something, just do it.
636.
▲
by
Cogito
13y ago
Sorry I missed this earlier! I do mean explicitly adding a link to the source from the site itself. Sure, you may not get anyone to contribute, but at least there are no excuses not to. The best feedback almost always comes in the form of a
637.
▲
by
Cogito
13y ago
You should make the source more discoverable, particularly on your 'homepage'. Particularly on a site like this, but also in general, in doesn't take much more effort to write a pull request than it does to write a comment. F
638.
▲
by
Cogito
13y ago
Here is the fulltext[0] - there were 6 pages to click through! [0] http://www.businessweek.com/printer/articles/133612-in-iraq-...
639.
▲
by
Cogito
13y ago
No worries :) Would love feedback on the interface if you are able. The interface feels pretty good with mouse, and seems like it would translate well to iPad, but I won't be able to test myself for a few more hours. I thought about ad
640.
▲
by
Cogito
13y ago
I added some simple click handling to the world map to hopefully enable continued play on mobile devices. Pull request here[0]. By clicking on the north of the map you move north etc. Might be improved by making it relative to the player, r
641.
▲
by
Cogito
13y ago
From the pdf, it looks like there is no patch available for versions <= 6.2.2 From my experience the time to turn-around a product upgrade is typically a lot longer than a security patch. Furthermore, the way the licensing works means th
642.
▲
by
Cogito
13y ago
This is a very serious remote exploitation of the Crowd service, looks like version 2.6.3 is the only fully patched and safe version. Abstract: This advisory examines a critical vulnerability in Atlassian Crowd a software package marketed a
643.
▲
Atlassian Crowd unpatched 'symmetric backdoor' remote XML exploit [pdf]
(commandfive.com)
3 points
by
Cogito
13y ago
|
3 comments
644.
▲
by
Cogito
13y ago
For those that waited years to get into the private beta, it is now open to everyone! SpyParty is a really fun and unique game, I'm looking forward to seeing the game and its community (which is one of the best I have ever seen) continue to
645.
▲
SpyParty Beta Registration is now open to everyone
(spyparty.com)
1 points
by
Cogito
13y ago
|
1 comments
646.
▲
by
Cogito
13y ago
Maybe it's just because I spend too much time lurking here, but I see a relatively large number of re-posts (or things which I have read before somewhere). I don't usually comment on these articles, however especially when it looks like s
647.
▲
by
Cogito
13y ago
I don't think it's wrong to repost this, I was just providing some background for people who might be interested. When I read this post I remembered the previous one so dug it up; turns out the post references the original source, which I h
648.
▲
by
Cogito
13y ago
This is pretty old (I think it started circulating around 2004? [4]) and was first publicly posted at jasonbock.net[1], although his site seems to be having problems so here is a cached version [2]. The intro posted there is as follows: Th
649.
▲
by
Cogito
13y ago
I think this is a different, unrelated article. In the experiment you linked to the researchers managed to force an electron into a huge orbit, on the scale of millimetres. In the OP's article they are imaging normal Hydrogen atoms. It's ve
650.
▲
by
Cogito
13y ago
I couldn't dig up the original article, but I wouldn't be too surprised if the images were in fact millimetres in size. The images are of electrons scattered from hydrogen atoms, directed onto a plate by an electromagnet. The scattering alm
651.
▲
by
Cogito
13y ago
Knowing which pieces are coming next makes a significant difference in edge cases, but I'm not sure how it would affect the bot in typical play. If you can predict the pieces perfectly you will always[1] perform at least as well as the same
652.
▲
by
Cogito
13y ago
I can second this. I was involved in a relatively large server mod community, primarily as a dev, but as time went on more and more time was spent moderating the community and managing incoming work. By getting involved, even without coding
653.
▲
by
Cogito
13y ago
They don't want it to last longer, that is one of the reasons they chose this specific biopolymer. The splint provides a structure for the airways to grow in/around/within, making sure they don't collapse in the meantime. Once the airways a
654.
▲
by
Cogito
13y ago
I'm not sure what you are trying to say here. Light will travel in the fastest way possible under a certain set of well known constraints. I think trying to apply this same model to how 'mathematicians' cross the road is flawed, although it
655.
▲
by
Cogito
13y ago
I think this model is flawed. It tries to boil the problem down to a 'discomfort' level, where what really matters is how long I think I can comfortably stay on the road, how fast I can cross the road, and how long I expect to wait to cross
656.
▲
by
Cogito
13y ago
Are you disagreeing that investment is often needed in order to gain profit? I definitely did not advocate gambling money away, but rather that "an objective view of the situation" requires you "to understand the impact existing investment
657.
▲
by
Cogito
13y ago
> I think you misunderstand sunk cost. Sunk cost basically just says to always employ a purely-forward-looking strategy when evaluating costs and benefits I don't think I misunderstand sunk cost, but perhaps I didn't explain my point we
658.
▲
by
Cogito
13y ago
It's easy to presume that sunk costs should have no weight when considering the relative value of different options. For many endeavours a certain amount of investment is required before returns are seen - investments in time and money in p
659.
▲
by
Cogito
13y ago
The Double Fine Adventure guys are doing that, for an example of how it could work. They call the second round supporters 'slacker backers' [0]. I would also pre-order now if I could. [0] http://www.doublefine.com/dfapay/
660.
▲
by
Cogito
13y ago
Applying the concept from this problem to the one at hand, try the following scheme: Alice picks an arbitrary point A on the pizza. Bess picks a second point B, and Cath then picks a point C. Cut the pizza from the centre to those points. A
More ›