Closi

12 ms·

151.
by Closi 1y ago
oop found a security issue - you can abuse profile pictures to upload any file (e.g. to host malware if you were a bad actor!) IMO don't think this is ready for production use in the slightest - but cool project!
152.
by Closi 1y ago
A few other trivial bugs I have found: * Can create multiple workspaces with same name which then ticks both * Invite user seems to not work randomly or will not send the email * Cards with special characters like @ will just not be created
153.
by Closi 1y ago
Just as a heads up, that roadmap you linked is broken. The formatting looks all off for me on chrome mac (black bars) and then if I click on a card it opens a window but then doesn't load any data. Also it looks like a bug that if you
154.
by Closi 1y ago
More cynically, they probably also know that the AI path is one that they can't win.
155.
by Closi 1y ago
> Given the cited stats here and elsewhere as well as in everyday experience, does anyone else feel that this model isn’t significantly different, at least to justify the full version increment? My experience is the opposite - I'm u
156.
by Closi 1y ago
I think this seems to be veering off into some specific ethical viewpoint about milk supply chains and production rather than an analogy for product vs process. But personally I can't see how the popularity of oat and almond milk in in
157.
by Closi 1y ago
I think this is a strange take - Technological advancements aren't mutual funds. Of course it's an indicator of future performance - Not a guarantee, but certainly a indictator .
158.
by Closi 1y ago
I like your analogy, but I don't think people even go "the cow gave this milk" - I think they tend to just go "mmmm yummy yummy milk" People usually see the product rather than the process.
159.
by Closi 1y ago
Bill Gates saw computers and extrapolated that there would be one in every home, Gordon Moore produced Moores Law which literally extrapolated compute in the 60s and almost still holding, and you can extrapolate that GPT-5 will perform bett
160.
by Closi 1y ago
I don’t get how someone can look at these videos and think “wow there’s lots of flaws and it’s sloppy and no storytelling” rather than “holy smokes this stuff is improving fast!” In 2 years we have moved from AI video being mostly a pipe dr
161.
by Closi 1y ago
Totally agree. Also the term 'LLM' is more about the mechanics of the thing than what the user gets. LLM is the technology, but some sort of automated artificial intelligence is what people are generally buying. As an example, whe
162.
by Closi 1y ago
I think AI is a useful term which usually means a neural network architecture but without specifying the exact architecture. I think Machine Learning doesn't mean this as a word, as it can also refer to linear regression, non-linear op
163.
by Closi 1y ago
Sure, but everyone knows humans end up bringing down the database too by writing an innocent looking test query nobody else blinks at, which is why you end up needing a testing strategy for ANY SQL before YOLO'ing into prod.
164.
by Closi 1y ago
If that’s the scenario, I would be asking why the testing pipeline didn’t catch this rather than why was the AI SQL wrong.
165.
by Closi 1y ago
I think there is a world where you have both - a portion of research sitting under constraints, and also massive computing capability to help build the next big model. Put another way - I doubt OpenAI would have built GPT-3 faster if they h
166.
by Closi 1y ago
It’s not an either/or - it can be both! If you have the best foundational research, but then find yourself blocked by compute, that’s a bad place to be in. At the moment compute is a constraint too (at least for the smaller shops, mayb
167.
by Closi 1y ago
Why can't it? I think you may have slightly misread my post in terms of the single cell aspect. > First to file would not allow Ocado to have patented the concept of the robot sitting above a cell/tote Ocado patented the concep
168.
by Closi 1y ago
I think the story is probably something like: * AutoStore sold a solution to Ocado * Ocado started modifying their own installation. AutoStore gave them the rights to do this naively thinking it was for their own use. * Ocado started aggres
169.
by Closi 1y ago
Ocado's first automated warehouse installation was also purchased from Autostore (before they built their own solution, and now market/sell it)
170.
by Closi 1y ago
AutoStore losing a patent dispute doesn't mean that Ocado didn't copy them. Just looking at the patent dispute ignores that the first automated Ocado distribution centre was actually purchased from AutoStore, who had been sellin
171.
by Closi 1y ago
Not sure why Ocado gets so much credit for the latter though, they just copied AutoStore which has a fascinating history! They purchased an AutoStore, then reverse engineered it, made a few changes, and claimed it as their own invention.
172.
by Closi 1y ago
It depends what you count as learning - you told it something, and it then applied that new knowledge, and if you come back to that conversation in 10 years, it will still have that new knowledge and be able to use it. Then when OpenAI does
173.
by Closi 1y ago
I'm not sure humans meet the definition here. If you took the average human from birth and gave them only 'the most primitive first principles', the chance that they would have novel insights into medicine is doubtful. I also
174.
by Closi 1y ago
Why not tax the negative factors then, rather than the country of origin? i.e. If the price is supposed to be a lever for labor conditions, why just tax China heavily and not Bangladesh? Why tax more fuel-efficient European cars instead of
175.
by Closi 2y ago
Well AGI can write unit tests, write application code then run the tests and iterate - agents in cursor are doing this already. Just not for more complex applications. Code review does often find bugs in code… Put another way, I’m not a str
176.
by Closi 2y ago
Why do human programmers need code review then if they are intelligent? And why can’t expert programmers deploy code without testing it? Surely they should just be able to write it perfectly first time without errors if they were actually i
177.
by Closi 2y ago
Although I think if you asked people 20 years ago to describe a test for something AGI would do, they would be more likely to say “writing a poem” or “making art” than “turning Xunit code to Tunit” IMO I think if you said to someone in the
178.
by Closi 2y ago
You presumably understand the posters underlying point though - that the definition of 'general intelligence' does not need to be 'at above-average human level' and humans can be intelligent without being able to use a c
179.
by Closi 2y ago
This is an incredibly specific test/definition of AGI - particularly remembering that I would probably say an octopus classes as an intelligent being yet can't use outlook...
180.
by Closi 2y ago
The hallucination quantity and severity is way less in new frontier models.

More ›