Closi

46 ms·

721.
by Closi 3y ago
Can you give a specific example?
722.
by Closi 3y ago
There is also an assumption in the paper that the information would be released without the blackmail, and that blackmail is just a commercial-option to 'stop' the information release for the benefit of both parties. This is wrong
723.
by Closi 3y ago
This paper seems to have too much 'whataboutism'. Sam says that we shouldn't exploit poisoned people by charging lots of money for an antitode, and the paper literally responds by calling him in favour of a 'fascist mode
724.
by Closi 3y ago
Yep, or if you are working on a project to build a control system for a new factory which is going live in 18 months, it's pretty reasonable for your management team to want to know that you have confidence you can build the control sy
725.
by Closi 3y ago
I think they mean it from a softer perspective - Scrum encourages more time ensuring all the team and tasks are clearly directed towards an outcome for that sprint. Just putting outcomes as cards on a kanban board will not have that same ef
726.
by Closi 3y ago
Inability to complete certain tasks does not mean that the system is not intelligent. It’s possible for a system to be intelligent and also fail at these questions. IMO a system is intelligent if it can answer some questions that require in
727.
by Closi 3y ago
Yes I agree - I really meant it doesn't directly learn from your interaction (i.e. it forgets you spoke as soon as you close the session, and only learns indirectly through the next training run - your words do not affect it's int
728.
by Closi 3y ago
We can point to a handful of strange examples where GPT4 appears to be unsuccessful, but that ignores the buckets of examples where it knocks things out of the park. And the areas where it isn't successful appear to being closed quickl
729.
by Closi 3y ago
> It can only do what it was trained to do: make a good guess at what word should come next. Disagree - GPT's mechanics are that it guesses what word/token should come next, however it is now displaying emergent capabilities w
730.
by Closi 3y ago
> There is no artificial intelligence. There are only systems that are very good at generating text or images when given a text prompt. That's not intelligence, and it's misleading if not dangerous to call it that. Disagree -
731.
by Closi 3y ago
But not use both at once?
732.
by Closi 3y ago
Why not just buy a computer that is correctly-sized to play games, rather than buy an AI-sized computer that you mostly use for games?
733.
by Closi 3y ago
It's more likely that you want a lot of compute for a very little amount of time each day - which makes centralised/cloud processing the most obvious answer. If I want a response within 100ms, and have 1000 AI-queries per day, tha
734.
by Closi 3y ago
Are you using the gpt3 api?
735.
by Closi 3y ago
A computer could clearly emulate the neurons in the human brain right now if we could map the connections and their strengths accurately - the human brain has many less neurons than GPT4 has parameters.
736.
by Closi 3y ago
Pretty easy to get API access, I got it within a few days. Aware this is a sample of one, but also can’t believe they fast tracked me.
737.
by Closi 3y ago
You can overcome this with prompt engineering. “If a player tries to do something not strictly within the rules of <insert game>, then you must inform me that it is an invalid move and not accept it” GPT appears to be slightly tuned t
738.
by Closi 3y ago
I think there are a few tricks I use to get correct code: 1) GPT4 is a must, the code quality is so much better than GPT3 2) You can use a longer explanation than you think. Be detailed in exactly what you want. Clearly describe function in
739.
by Closi 4y ago
Considering it is a one-time payment, it would be nice if I could use my own API key. Although you call it a "no-tricks pricing" model, a 'one time lifetime license' for a product that I can't use the key feature of
740.
by Closi 4y ago
There is a lot of difference between being as secure as practically possible with password data, and allowing anyone with root access to see all your password data.
741.
by Closi 4y ago
> Buying something and buying a right to use it are two different things. If somebody told me that they are selling me a house and then I discover that I only got the right to live in it, I would be pissed off. Probably a bad example -
742.
by Closi 4y ago
It’s about what the word “buy” means though. If we are happy that you can buy services, I assume we are happy with Steam using “buy” to represent the purchase of the service and licensing offering they have?
743.
by Closi 4y ago
It's not very different, both are under law, just one is under contract law . Of course you can own things that you can't sell anyway, you can own an extended warranty on your flatscreen television, or own non-transferrable bonds
744.
by Closi 4y ago
I guess you can believe that, but that's a very narrow definition of "buy" and certinaly more narrow than both the dictionary definition and common usage. Under your definition you can't buy a ticket to a concert, or buy
745.
by Closi 4y ago
What do you believe 'buy' means if it doesn't mean access to download the game and a digital licence to use it? Also is GameStop allowed to use the term 'buy' in their shops? Because they are often selling a licence
746.
by Closi 4y ago
You can absolutely own things without being able to sell them. See pharmaceuticals as an obvious/trivial example - you can own prescription drugs without being able to sell/dispense them.
747.
by Closi 4y ago
It's true, but if a murderer that donated to charity was imprisoned I would probably go with "a murderer imprisoned in France" rather than "a philanthropist imprisoned in France".
748.
by Closi 4y ago
"An activist imprisoned in France" makes this sound like some sort of locked up protestor, rather than someone that set fire to a load of vehicles and a warehouse. It should really read "An arsonist imprisoned in France&quo
749.
by Closi 4y ago
The main strategy for Microsoft is slightly different IMO - It's to use GPT-4 to make their products even better.
750.
by Closi 4y ago
Well if you are buying something, of course the language can be "buy". And you do have ownership of the licence.

More ›