Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Closi
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
21 ms
·
301.
▲
by
Closi
2y ago
The AI images are completely wrong - these show full containers rather than single pallets.
302.
▲
by
Closi
2y ago
I didn’t vote for it, and think Brexit was bad, but also agree that the EU is overly bureaucratic, un-democratic, and doesn’t see countries as truly autonomous (eg tries to be redistribute wealth between the countries). The best scenario no
303.
▲
by
Closi
2y ago
If labour ran on a manifesto of higher taxes and reverse brexit this election would be a shitshow. I don’t actually agree that our taxes/spending have to increase in order to get a better standard of living - what we need is services w
304.
▲
by
Closi
2y ago
Politician smeared during election? Shock horror, it happens during every election. Leader of the party can't unite their own party so there is a plan to oust them? That's politics. Jeremy couldn't particularly unite the part
305.
▲
by
Closi
2y ago
People on the whole don't want a Jeremy Corbyn anyway - he led his party to the biggest labour defeat since 1935. Don't know why the labour party would want to replicate that shit-show.
306.
▲
by
Closi
2y ago
Going 'full left' is the exact reason Labour hasn't been in power for 14 years. You are describing the recipe for a one-term government IMO - Elections are won from the center, and moving Left will open a center gap for someo
307.
▲
by
Closi
2y ago
What if the maintainer is assumed to be an LLM?
308.
▲
by
Closi
2y ago
Only if we are counting the cost to generate all the inputs to training, and not just the training itself - it just depends on the scope of the analysis. (i.e. taken to the extreme, as humans learn from their environment, do we have to coun
309.
▲
by
Closi
2y ago
Humans also learn from other humans (we stand on the shoulders of giants), so we would need to account for all the energy that has gone into generating all of human knowledge in the 'human' scenario too. i.e. not many humans inven
310.
▲
by
Closi
2y ago
I think you would probably have to take into account the full functioning power of a human too. We don't know how to fully operate a human brain when it's fully disconnected from eyes, a mouth, limbs, ears and a human heart.
311.
▲
by
Closi
2y ago
Huge nuisance to manually maintain, but the suggestion is that you maintain it with an LLM. Is the code bad? Sure. Could I build this in 10 hours without an LLM having no experience with cloudflare workers and typescript? Probably not. Coul
312.
▲
by
Closi
2y ago
Thanks, my mistake!
313.
▲
by
Closi
2y ago
It's not about the level of calculus knowledge for me - it's about building this from scratch with 1960's technology in 50 lines of basic and very little prior art. It's easier to be the second person to do something.
314.
▲
by
Closi
2y ago
I would say it's misleading when it's in a paragraph which is broadly implying that a high gross profit % is a sign of profiteering. See the actual paragraph where the article compares the gross margin of SaaS against the NET marg
315.
▲
by
Closi
2y ago
I agree that people probably don't want to pay continuously, but i'm not convinced that people in general don't want automatic/ongoing product updates.
316.
▲
by
Closi
2y ago
It needs access to a computer, creativity, and an impressive amount of capability for a high school senior. This is 5 years before pong - you are inventing game concepts from scratch rather than standing on the shoulders of giants.
317.
▲
by
Closi
2y ago
The second point just strands parts of customers on outdated versions - remember that time when loads of companies were running Excel 1997 or 2003 to their deaths to save costs? Then anyone on Excel 2013 couldn't use any new features b
318.
▲
by
Closi
2y ago
> The result? Some SaaS companies achieve gross profit margins of 75 to 90 percent, rivaling Windows in its monopolistic heyday. Gross profit is a misleading statistic in the software industry, where almost all of the effort comes from b
319.
▲
by
Closi
2y ago
I think this is still a tech-centric view rather than a product-oriented view. E.g. Apple generating emojis using a diffusion model is clearly less SOTA than other image models, but could be a really neat feature from a product/user pe
320.
▲
by
Closi
2y ago
You can do multiline formulas in the advanced formula environment, but still follows the same syntax as the formula language (with comments). i.e.: =LET( x,1, // assign 1 to y y,2, // assign 2 to y x+y &
321.
▲
by
Closi
2y ago
Apple seems to be betting that something polished which is “less than state of the art” will sell better than something less polished and more advanced. Technical capability is rarely more important than product market fit.
322.
▲
by
Closi
2y ago
Would love a product like this that offered pricing on a concurrent user basis or similar. We have 15 people on our team but 90% of people might only log in once a month to have a look at the pipeline - don’t want to either have a shared ac
323.
▲
by
Closi
2y ago
100% - the current SOTA with the right implementation can already replace a lot of contact center work, give us a real-life J.A.R.V.I.S. and make video games where your decisions actually influence the story in a wildly meaningful way.
324.
▲
by
Closi
2y ago
Although it seems looking at the article it said there were significant gains for right-wing parties, so it did end up being right on that one!
325.
▲
by
Closi
2y ago
On the flipside, AI's have a super-human ability to consume knowledge that humans can't compete with. This just seems like putting a human-constraint on AI systems so that we can still classify ourselves as special.
326.
▲
by
Closi
2y ago
A moving definition of intelligence isn't particularly useful though if we are trying to establish if something classifies as intelligent or not. But I think we have at least moved from a state of computers that are less 'intellig
327.
▲
by
Closi
2y ago
True, but that's also kind of the point - we have grown computers from adding number (calculator 1960s capability) to being able to beat humans at chess (1997) to beating humans at jeopardy (2013) to breaking the turing test (2020+), L
328.
▲
by
Closi
2y ago
> "What I know is that there is no evidence that we are going to get human level artificial intelligence any time soon" Disagree with this statement - it's too broad. There are plenty of tasks where AI's can fully out
329.
▲
by
Closi
2y ago
Your take-away is that this is ChatGPT's fault rather than a failure of testing?
330.
▲
by
Closi
2y ago
Doesnt that likely demonstrate insufficient resource/capacity rather than OPs point that there are too many bureaucrats?
More ›