ChickeNES

6 ms·

61.
by ChickeNES 27d ago
Just apply to the cyber program? I got in in around 2 hours, and I'm just some hobby hacker, not some paid security consultant. It is a valid point though, I'm doing tons of systems and embedded stuff and was hitting the safe guar
62.
by ChickeNES 27d ago
Well I just applied to their cyber program, got accepted in two hours, haven't had that issue since. Ditto OpenAI. Why people treat these companies like sports teams instead of compute providers I have no idea, when I see underpriced c
63.
by ChickeNES 27d ago
So you want to remove valid safeguards? And stop misusing the word censorship.
64.
by ChickeNES 27d ago
For me, I'm glad they train on my stuff if it improves the model. Hell, I've been using tons of muse-spark-1.3-contributor for this very reason (and because it's a decent model for a bargain basement price)
65.
by ChickeNES 27d ago
> If you can run a model locally then you can somewhat train out the guardrails, censorship, and brand-safety. When does the average person actually need to do that?
66.
by ChickeNES 1mo ago
Oh I've been maxing out my twin Pro/Max $200 accounts for the past 12 months or so :P
67.
by ChickeNES 1mo ago
Point taken, I probably file a lot of that away under "generic HN spam" (or maybe I've gotten so good at skimming Claude output that my eyes glaze over automatically now in response :P)
68.
by ChickeNES 1mo ago
Did you forget to log into the right account to reply to me?
69.
by ChickeNES 1mo ago
Says the green account astroturfer!
70.
by ChickeNES 1mo ago
> > You want > No, bud. That's what your projection says. I said clearly I suggest HN curate more or give tools to self-curate. Those are literally the same thing
71.
by ChickeNES 1mo ago
> Do we live in a parallel universe? I mean it, this week was crazy from a progress point of view. This is how I feel too, wandering into some of these threads. Sure the damn things aren't perfect yet, but people act as if they are
72.
by ChickeNES 1mo ago
No, the people promising AGI 6 months ago are now saying it's here. (and I agree)
73.
by ChickeNES 1mo ago
> But do you think this is our first rodeo with "XYZ has fundamentally shifted things and startups now start up faster"? RoR did the same, Bootstrap as well, and countless of other things. I really don't understand anyone
74.
by ChickeNES 1mo ago
I didn't say disliking a particular technology is anti-human. I said being against technology is.
75.
by ChickeNES 1mo ago
What is stopping "LLM generated content" from "satisfy[ing] intellectual curiosity"?
76.
by ChickeNES 1mo ago
Well...at the rate things are going, probably not tapering off after a few weeks :P
77.
by ChickeNES 1mo ago
Or they could...just use Reddit or Lobsters, it's so weird that they want to fight the whole purpose of this site.
78.
by ChickeNES 1mo ago
All I ever see are the Anti's and the crazies? Like the guy (who is in this very post) who keeps opening accounts to complain about Claude related posts and saying various slurs. Almost feels like the old days when Terry Davis would po
79.
by ChickeNES 1mo ago
No? It's still about tech, same as always
80.
by ChickeNES 1mo ago
> From what I can see, Jeffries hasn't been involved in actual software development for decades (he is ~87 and has a lot of great accomplishments under his belt, but in the year 2026, 0% of his income relies upon him generating sol
81.
by ChickeNES 1mo ago
Greed is good. You're on a website run by a VC firm lmao
82.
by ChickeNES 1mo ago
I want to see the end of human labor entirely, so I say: "BRING IT ON!"
83.
by ChickeNES 1mo ago
> Bad blog. The Anti's have been cranking up their submissions of this junk lately.
84.
by ChickeNES 1mo ago
Luckily the former get things done while the latter whine.
85.
by ChickeNES 1mo ago
Being against technology is anti-human
86.
by ChickeNES 1mo ago
> I really don't understand why we just collectively accepted that. Because none of what you said is true.
87.
by ChickeNES 1mo ago
Same, just wish I could afford the computer to train my own ngl
88.
by ChickeNES 1mo ago
Yeah I think this is pretty easy to explain: YouTube (sure, there’s terrible terrible channels out there, but also great ones and a fair many fine-to-good ones), Nebula/Curiosity Stream, podcasts, substacks (lol), LLMs, Anna’s Archive&
89.
by ChickeNES 1mo ago
> overly consistent vocalization Is this...really an issue? I can't really blame people for automating their own voice.
90.
by ChickeNES 1mo ago
GetRight was a fucking lifesaver when I was stuck on a 28.8k dial up connection that loved to drop at the worst possible time.

More ›