Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
CharlieDigital
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
61.
▲
by
CharlieDigital
4mo ago
$1500/mo is $18,000/seat/annum. Maybe Microsoft and Nvidia are on to something. 128 GB machines that can run local LLMs are a bargain even if priced $5-8k. Yes, tok/s is not quite there, but that's probably OK sinc
62.
▲
by
CharlieDigital
4mo ago
I rather like Ace better because the key problem right now is teams not working together and shipping the wrong things. When AI can generate the code, then it feels like product should be bringing the functional vocabulary and grammar wh
63.
▲
by
CharlieDigital
4mo ago
> ...add something like apache AGE, but arguably that is also a small ecosystem (at least IMHO as I never heard it until I actually started looking for Neo4J alternatives) Outside of the most trivial use cases, I've found
64.
▲
by
CharlieDigital
4mo ago
> [falconetpt] We now have a tacking system where people were forced to send telemetry from codex/claude into the servers and people are auditing each session CTO did the same on my team. While a the same time chastising
65.
▲
by
CharlieDigital
4mo ago
That's because you're not thinking about how teams and enterprises work. You're thinking about how individuals work. An enterprise has 20 services that each have a secret key (Datadog, Snowflake, etc). I want my team to hav
66.
▲
by
CharlieDigital
4mo ago
Sure. It would be great if they were portable as well. To make them interoperable so that the APIs have similar surface areas and can just be used without special skills, we could even come up with a standard API surface area and create a.
67.
▲
by
CharlieDigital
4mo ago
MCP is more than is more than tools. Tools is one of three major features: prompts[0] and resources[1] being the other two. Prompts are effectively "server delivered skills" which are are quite powerful because it solves a distri
68.
▲
by
CharlieDigital
4mo ago
It would be really, really great if Codex could support MCP Prompts[0] This would allow us to deliver standard prompts across the team without having to sync manually or with scripts; keep everyone up to date. Even allow per-user customi
69.
▲
by
CharlieDigital
4mo ago
This one? https://chrlschn.dev/blog/2026/03/mcp-is-dead-long-live-mcp/
70.
▲
by
CharlieDigital
4mo ago
https://github.com/dotnet/Open-XML-SDK First party from Microsoft; feels like it would be the way to go.
71.
▲
by
CharlieDigital
4mo ago
It will regress to the mean. The default output of any agent is going to be Transaction Script, for example. It will never on its own accord start writing Domain Model. As it produces more Transaction Script and sesles its own Transaction
72.
▲
by
CharlieDigital
4mo ago
I don't think this is comparable. It's more like a restaurant. You give an order and a little while later, a finished dish appears. The difference between a Chipotle and a Michelin starred establishment is that Chipotle is just a
73.
▲
by
CharlieDigital
4mo ago
> Surely the desired state isn't that nobody knows how to write code any more right? Shaping up like that in my org. At least one mid-career dev says he no longer looks at code. I still look at code and find that agents w
74.
▲
by
CharlieDigital
4mo ago
It's a shame because to guide a coding agent, you need to have the right grammar and vocabulary to describe what you want and how you want it to be built. Junior devs should read not because they need to know how to write the code, bu
75.
▲
by
CharlieDigital
4mo ago
> And you think forcing blockbuster's software teams to use the Web would have changed that? Yes; non-zero chance that had they been more aggressive in pushing the web, someone would have landed on the right answer.
76.
▲
by
CharlieDigital
4mo ago
If it were that simple and obvious, Blockbuster would have beat everyone to streaming. Sears would have digitized their catalog and used their vast brick-and-mortar stores as fulfillment centers for same-day shipping. None of these shifts
77.
▲
by
CharlieDigital
4mo ago
> I would prefer to search for new usages in a more strategic way I think this is very, very hard for orgs to do. Looking back at the Internet, who would have thought that it would eventually create a Netflix, Amazon, Shopify,
78.
▲
by
CharlieDigital
4mo ago
> The web took off all by itself because it had a clear value proposition for some use cases. Many enterprises became legacy because of the web, many enterprises failed because they didn't understand the impact of the tech
79.
▲
by
CharlieDigital
4mo ago
A story to share: friend vibe coded absolute slop with Replit starting late 2024 (!!). Absolute trash code. Hacked multiple times because his login code exposed the full user list on the FE (!!!). Hacker found a way to exploit his accoun
80.
▲
by
CharlieDigital
4mo ago
> What's the hurry? There are definitely key windows here for innovation driven by competition. There's also a need to quickly adopt and understand the technology; take the Internet for example. If we were talking ab
81.
▲
by
CharlieDigital
4mo ago
C# massive standard library and first party libraries means much, much fewer external dependencies and these libraries are managed by a team of paid, professional engineers. Highly, highly underrated.
82.
▲
by
CharlieDigital
4mo ago
> Why would taking the more open, minimalist, configurable and ultimately diligent route means you won't be working on anything else?? You're using the same finite pool of time and tokens. Why waste your time with th
83.
▲
by
CharlieDigital
4mo ago
> we might have some innovation in the food delivery system of our hotel chain This is really relative to the size of that innovation, isn't it? > Imagine you employ me as a hotel manager, and I come to you and sa
84.
▲
by
CharlieDigital
4mo ago
That's like arguing that you should spend your time tuning your IDE. How does that relate to end-user value created? Yes, you built yourself a nice little utility. Meanwhile, you wasted those tokens and time that could have been spent
85.
▲
by
CharlieDigital
4mo ago
OpenClaw is far from useful. Aside from the creator trading the fame for a job at OpenAI, it's hard to see how it's transformed anything.
86.
▲
by
CharlieDigital
4mo ago
I'm going to offer a contrarian view here: First is that despite a lot of waste, some innovation will arise from an enterprising employee finding some interesting use case. A lot of the tokenmaxxing is just waste, but out of that wa
87.
▲
by
CharlieDigital
4mo ago
It is not worth switching to Pi except as a hobbyist. Something that is overlooked: the mainstream harnesses have a huge advantage in telemetry and datapoints to use to improve the harness. They have internal teams building the tooling. T
88.
▲
by
CharlieDigital
5mo ago
We have; but it's also not easily practical because there is some judgement involved and it's not really feasible to point out all of the edge cases (bloating the context). What is not clear to me is whether this is inherent desir
89.
▲
by
CharlieDigital
5mo ago
Team is a mix; I'm personally using Codex, gpt-5.5 high fast + Claude Opus 4.6 (occasionally Sonnet 4.6). Mix of CLI (Codex) and GH Copilot (if I want active line selection). We have a set of custom skills and knowledge base as well.
90.
▲
by
CharlieDigital
5mo ago
It's a mixed bag. I've been working with Apache AGE (openCypher in Postgres) recently and found that left to its own device, the agent wrote terribly inefficient queries, even when given a test harness and instructions to examine
More ›