Catloafdev

5 ms·

31.
by Catloafdev 1mo ago
I don't get it, are you implying everyone who's not a fan of this change is a Google employee?
32.
by Catloafdev 1mo ago
That's a higher percentage of the population than those who voted for the winning candidate in the last presidential election. I wouldn't say that's comparable to ~15%.
33.
by Catloafdev 1mo ago
Good point, I didn't see that. I guess I categorized them in the same bucket of 'runs on 128gb machines' Guess Qwen 4 is the one to wait for.
34.
by Catloafdev 1mo ago
Very curious to see how this compares to Deepseek v4 Flash. I have to assume they wouldn't be releasing this if it was worse.
35.
by Catloafdev 1mo ago
If only you were able to take your perspective one step farther. Why did he commit suicide?
36.
by Catloafdev 2mo ago
No, but you failed to comprehend the section of my comment where I mentioned "workarounds [...] are what the existing ad blockers now use"
37.
by Catloafdev 2mo ago
This is a narrative that MS, Google etc want you to believe. They gutted it for ads. That's what's happening. There are workarounds now, that's what the existing ad block options are. They are heavily kneecapped.
38.
by Catloafdev 2mo ago
How is this relevant?
39.
by Catloafdev 2mo ago
Trusting snake oil is a wild choice.
40.
by Catloafdev 2mo ago
I mean what are these devs doing that they are day-1 updating npm packages still? How many instances of this are required before npm package maintainers learn?
41.
by Catloafdev 2mo ago
Your comment was fine, I didn't think you were implying that at all. I was just trying to clarify that they aren't choosing to do that for arbitrary reasons.
42.
by Catloafdev 2mo ago
Neat! But, what do you do with a 0.5tk/s LLM? Have you tried running it via llamacpp or other software that supports naive SSD offloading to compare speeds?
43.
by Catloafdev 2mo ago
The problem is the 'options to be intentionally non-destructive' come with legal liabilities that don't exist if they destroy the original copy.
44.
by Catloafdev 2mo ago
The scanning process they use is _intentionally_ destructive, not accidentally destructive. It's not because they hate books or something. It's literally to stay in the law due to the legal rulings surrounding AI companies and cop
45.
by Catloafdev 2mo ago
If you bothered to read the article, you'd understand why this is, in fact, a problem.
46.
by Catloafdev 2mo ago
Weird that you comment on rage bait and end your comment with the idea that this group of people are all a bunch of worthless drug users.
47.
by Catloafdev 2mo ago
If any editors are reading this thread, the weights are on HF now, but the 'open source' question still implies it's proprietary/API-only.
48.
by Catloafdev 2mo ago
> Agent code can only be read and understood by agents. This just fundamentally isn't true and if this is your perspective then you're using LLMs wrong.
49.
by Catloafdev 2mo ago
That's LOC in a single file, that's a bit different from total LOC as a metric. Total LOC is a garbage metric. Things like reducing line count in specific files or components is a big benefit, but those lines are often moved, not
50.
by Catloafdev 2mo ago
There quite literally are internals that are called attention heads in modern LLMs. Saying 'there are no attention heads' is objectively false, which definition you follow is irrelevant.
51.
by Catloafdev 2mo ago
Ya I'd be interested to see a comparison of using llamacpp with ssd offloading to compare real speeds.
52.
by Catloafdev 2mo ago
> There are no "attention heads" Yes there quite literally is internally in an LLM.
53.
by Catloafdev 2mo ago
How is this different from Obsidian? Why would someone switch? The page is a bit lacking on detail.
54.
by Catloafdev 2mo ago
It's absolutely reasonable to have safeguards on sufficiently dangerous models being released - if you disagree, can you explain your perspective? I think it's wildly irresponsible to release models that are extremely capable at t
55.
by Catloafdev 2mo ago
> I would say any AI generated output... would have been extremely easy to detect > I write everything using AI and nobody has detected it Might need to rethink this one, Googling 'how to use AI to write for me and not get caught
56.
by Catloafdev 2mo ago
Why are you assuming they aren't? The people who have those books are choosing to sell them for a price. What isn't fair?
57.
by Catloafdev 2mo ago
I'm not sure I'd use the term 'brittle' to describe snake oil.
58.
by Catloafdev 2mo ago
Reassuring to see this backed by major players. This is the correct stance, hopefully this is the stance that prevails.
59.
by Catloafdev 2mo ago
The same authority he used to enact tariffs and a war.
60.
by Catloafdev 2mo ago
Well it seems to be hug-of-death'd - how are you loading 41k points of data?

More ›