CaptWillard

7 ms·

61.
by CaptWillard 2y ago
AFAIK, that number more accurately reflects the number of people who died within two weeks of testing positive using PCR tests at high Ct values (35-45), inflating case counts. 94-95% involved at least one comorbidity. Over 75% had at least
62.
by CaptWillard 2y ago
I'm referring to the medicine deployed against a pandemic whose death count is still entirely unknown. How many people died because of COVID? You don't know. No one knows. Meanwhile, everyone who knows better pretends that the m
63.
by CaptWillard 2y ago
Not sure when you graduated, but I've seen a complete inversion. Much like 90s rockers, they now rage exclusively on behalf of the machine.
64.
by CaptWillard 2y ago
Well, if the bombs bother you, wait until you hear about the string of destabilizing efforts in support of color revolu ... Er, I mean "capacity building" in support of "democracy" via hundreds of oxymoronic NGOs. Anyway
65.
by CaptWillard 2y ago
> It's pretty easy to see that certain people are XXXX and certain people are definitely not XXXX. What a fascinating pattern of thought.
66.
by CaptWillard 2y ago
I reject the premise for a number of reasons but many of them come down to how wildly subjective it is. What constitutes bullying behavior? Is there any context that would shift or nullify the label? How often must someone engage in this be
67.
by CaptWillard 2y ago
I reject the premise that people can be sorted into bullies and non-bullies. It's amusing/frustrating that such a premise is taken seriously.
68.
by CaptWillard 2y ago
Is that the same Bureau of Labor Statistics that revised their numbers down 818K, or 28% of original 2.9M jobs claimed to be added over the last year?
69.
by CaptWillard 2y ago
When you use phrases like "partisan politics" and "extremist", I assume you're talking about objective truths and reasonable opinions that run counter to establishment/corporate/IC narratives. I don't
70.
by CaptWillard 2y ago
"either you make it, or your hard earned skills are useless on the job market" I think uncommon focus, discipline, physical and mental dexterity along with the ability to perform under pressure are being undervalued here.
71.
by CaptWillard 2y ago
How did it clear up?
72.
by CaptWillard 2y ago
"censorship versus safety" Do you guys have any idea how sinister "safety" sounds in this context?
73.
by CaptWillard 2y ago
"He is primarially known specifically as someone who is incredibly impulsive, is unable to differentiate fact from fiction and not actually interested in chasing any kind of objective truth" I'm sure you could make a case t
74.
by CaptWillard 2y ago
Well, good news / bad news ... Good news is the people in the stratospheric pay grades agree, and have been working toward it. Bad news is that the means and outcomes are indeed heinous.
75.
by CaptWillard 2y ago
> Taibi's reporting only showed what was happening before Musk took over, not after, so it doesn't back you up. Do you hear yourself? Do you think that's any kind of cogent defense? You and I both know that you're car
76.
by CaptWillard 2y ago
Want to rephrase that without the straw man? And again, this was all presented to congress, and wasn't meaningfully challenged. Only buried and handwaved away, as you're attempting to do here.
77.
by CaptWillard 2y ago
What exactly is "dangerous" about what I'm referring to?
78.
by CaptWillard 2y ago
Sidestepping your ad hominem, 1) I didn't say the EU had the operation, though there is extensive cooperation, especially as related to NGOs and the IC. I believe this all started with the Integrity Initiative which was based in Englan
79.
by CaptWillard 2y ago
What would you have if not ad hominem? It's one thing to use that fallacious tactic on a general SM site, but do you really think it's a net gain here? I would almost pay for an intellectually honest debate on these subjects. It&#
80.
by CaptWillard 2y ago
"Consumer protections" in this context is cynical doublespeak for censorship. How dare we citizens know what our governments are doing in our name, with our money?
81.
by CaptWillard 2y ago
It has everything to do with propaganda and censorship. There is incalculable money and power on the line in the upcoming US election. I suspect you know all of this.
82.
by CaptWillard 2y ago
You know that's not true. It's all well documented.
83.
by CaptWillard 2y ago
I'm curious where you read that, but the operation I speak of is documented pretty thoroughly and was presented to congress. [1] https://judiciary.house.gov/committee-activity/hearings/hear... [2] https:&#x2
84.
by CaptWillard 2y ago
Government agencies had a sophisticated system of censorship and propaganda on Twitter before Elon bought it and shut them down. This is nothing more than a naked attempt to regain that control or at least throttle the flow of inconvenient
85.
by CaptWillard 2y ago
I mean, sorry if you're one of those "electricians on the Death Star" just trying to pay your mortgage, but your downvotes aren't going to put that toothpaste back in the tube.
86.
by CaptWillard 2y ago
"This, and the rest of it, has been explained to you countless times before." Yes, that's how propaganda works. But in the face of new information, that propaganda has to be tweaked or abandoned. To keep hammering the same me
87.
by CaptWillard 2y ago
Do you believe that's a meaningful metric? Because it's not. The distinction between Biden and Trump is that Trump is opposed to the machine that's been responsible for decades of disastrous foreign policy, while Biden is the
88.
by CaptWillard 2y ago
This "fairness" angle (if true) is such an embarrassing reach. IDGAF if Russia and China do the same things. I ASSUME they do them. The west enjoys the "free world" moniker and the distinction it implies. It should be he
89.
by CaptWillard 2y ago
I really don't want my government acting like my ex-girlfriend. When presented with evidence of her infidelity, her first and only reaction, "Who sent you those screenshots?! It was Sarah, wasn't it? You know she hates me. Wh
90.
by CaptWillard 2y ago
> you've just reinvented policing from first principles. Yes, in the absense of government protection (scroll up)

More ›