Canada

69 ms·

871.
by Canada 10y ago
Looking under my clothes is unacceptable. I don't care if it's fast or automated.
872.
by Canada 10y ago
SELinux was released in 1998. Linux was totally usable back then. I've been using it since 1995. I've never heard anyone claim lacking SMP support being a feature. In the case of OpenBSD it was just that nobody got around to it un
873.
by Canada 10y ago
Not sure network effects are necessary there. It's fine if one person makes videos with glasses as long as friends enjoy watching them. If the glasses are promoted as something you only wear when you want to record video and that you o
874.
by Canada 10y ago
Windows Internals: https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb963901.as...
875.
by Canada 10y ago
Kylin was the Chinese FreeBSD fork (if you can even call it that) started in 2001. This predates the privsep OpenSSH, W^X, chroot Apache, and all that. pf wasn't even released until the end of 2001. There was no support for SMP until 2
876.
by Canada 10y ago
I'd be interested to hear the author's opinion on pledge. Also, this article repeatedly points out that OpenBSD did not invent memory hardening techniques, but fails to acknowledge that they were by far the first to ship many of t
877.
by Canada 10y ago
I recall the proper name for X being "X Window System" with "X Windows" being merely slang. I remember early 90s Unix books being quite pedantic on that point. Is that right or is my memory faulty on that one? Good point
878.
by Canada 10y ago
Right, but at least "Windows" was somewhat unique in the area of computer operating systems. The word "gram" is much less unique in the areas of communication and delivery. After all, it's derived from telegram. Ins
879.
by Canada 10y ago
> We do this with a large amount of random data. Many TBs or perhaps as much as a PB. What's the tradeoff in using a much smaller pool and severely rate limiting its network interface?
880.
by Canada 10y ago
s/Include/Exclude/g
881.
by Canada 10y ago
> whether it solves the fundamental problems in the cryptographic situation it describes (viz. device which cannot straightaway engage in IP communication requires to receive unsolicitated securely-encrypted messages). Please elaborate a
882.
by Canada 10y ago
Feel free to propose a secure, decentralized way to pass the payload between the endpoints. Be sure your solution includes an effective mechanism to mitigate spam. Bonus if your solution denies attackers access to the same metadata centrali
883.
by Canada 10y ago
Forget the aop store. How do we know Google, Apple, Microsoft, Ubuntu, etc doesn't give us a malicious kernel update? I don't think we have good solutions for the problem of malicious updates in general. The only one I can think o
884.
by Canada 10y ago
Obviously the app maintainer could push an update that simply leaks your keys and stored messages. Doesn't matter if it's open or closed source. However, open source does give users some real recourse in the event that the project
885.
by Canada 10y ago
This post doesn't explain the protocol all that well. This is a great explainer: https://vimeo.com/117532499 I can't seem to find the PDF of the slides of this talk anymore. These are also very useful for understa
886.
by Canada 10y ago
I saw the mailing list post, then got the bad messages a day later. Probably the same issue, still curious about the technical details though.
887.
by Canada 10y ago
Yeah. My understanding is the message key used to decrypt first copy should be immediately deleted after decrypting it, so how can the second copy be decrypted successfully? Seems to fly in the face of forward secrecy unless it's purel
888.
by Canada 10y ago
I've been receiving a bunch of "Bad encrypted message..." lately. Wonder what's up with that.
889.
by Canada 10y ago
Okay, so the password generation is deterministic, based on a single secret I need to remember right? So then there has to be metadata to list the site domain, username, which generation of password, which characters are allowed or disallow
890.
by Canada 10y ago
I wonder if or when they'll think to ask for the user's associated push messaging ID. Then they could ask Apple or Google to turn over any cloud data they have for that phone.
891.
by Canada 10y ago
Look into verifiable shuffles, private information retrieval, and dining cryptographer networks. By combining such techniques, it's possible to be much much better than naive broadcast, and also possible to use a client/server arc
892.
by Canada 10y ago
Here are the recent numbers: http://www.bcstats.gov.bc.ca/StatisticsBySubject/Economy/Eco... Forestry is about the size of tech ($14 billion) which is twice tourism. To put it into perspective, the BC government s
893.
by Canada 10y ago
How does this handle situations where the generated password isn't accepted by the site? eg. Is too long, absolutely must have at least one symbol and one number, etc. How does this handle changing passwords? How can I know from the ma
894.
by Canada 10y ago
Do you have a will? Issues such as who will inherit copyright ownership of your work should be handled there. As for passwords, keys and so on, you can put all that into a single archive. (eg. regularly export your password manager, put any
895.
by Canada 10y ago
Are you looking for/interested in partners to help do the work?
896.
by Canada 10y ago
Nobody is thinking this way. Chinese people with money aren't particularly distrustful of their government, they're just trying to buy what they want before someone else does. An enormous number of Chinese people have made huge am
897.
by Canada 10y ago
I'd love something similar, but implemented as a browser extension.
898.
by Canada 10y ago
Nice try :)
899.
by Canada 10y ago
It is within the power of a province to credit 100% of provincial taxes back, although I wouldn't want to try that if I was governing a "have not" province, especially if part of the deal was cutting essential services subsid
900.
by Canada 10y ago
Only civil law.

More ›