Canada

50 ms·

601.
by Canada 8y ago
Can I see lbry://@SomebodyUnpopular without talking to the centralized search? If so that's very good as that person couldn't be deplatformed. Anyway, great job offering working and usable software. Way better than 99.99
602.
by Canada 8y ago
Right, so nothing stops you from altering the search results at will, which is the most critical part of the system in my opinion. Why bother with a blockchain then? Instead of letting content creators be tipped in bitcoins or something, is
603.
by Canada 8y ago
I installed the client and searched. Did the results come from the blockchain directly as seen by my client or did they come from a HTTP request to a server you run?
604.
by Canada 8y ago
Okay, so for a use case like The Pirate Bay, which is a popular database of magnet links and related metadata (Description, who added to the database, when added, etc). Users search this data in various ways. Can you explain how the same wo
605.
by Canada 8y ago
Actus reus and mens rea are both necessary in order for there to be a crime. In order to commit a crime, you need to do the criminal act and have the intention or knowledge of the criminal act. And you have to do it willfully, which means y
606.
by Canada 8y ago
This doesn't look credible at all. If this isn't a straight up scam, it's a bucket shop at best.
607.
by Canada 8y ago
No, it's also a power and money hungry agency. The airport security of yore just did their jobs and were a lot more pleasant to deal with. The traveling public was just as safe.
608.
by Canada 8y ago
I was being sarsactic. The TSA is nonsense and a huge waste of money not to mention time.
609.
by Canada 8y ago
Remember before all the TSA nonsense, airports had metal detectors and xrays operated by airport security? Did they not also prevent guns from being carried on planes?
610.
by Canada 8y ago
"they’re putting their lives on the line" Yeah right, my heros.
611.
by Canada 8y ago
It sure sounds like one way or the other your job at this company will be offshored. There's no generic answer. It really depends on your role in your team, how marketable the others on your team are, and how trustworthy they are. Who
612.
by Canada 8y ago
Not really, it works like this: Prior to the "contest" beginning everyone participating has to disclose what they have 0day for. In cases where more than 1 person brings 0day for a particular target then they will attack it in tur
613.
by Canada 8y ago
Whoever pwns the Telsa probably doesn't even live in Vancouver, so no, they're not going to drive off in the target vehicle. Telsa would have to arrange to provide one where they live, and yeah, I think it's safe to say that
614.
by Canada 8y ago
Exploits are already developed prior to the event. It's not a CTF where one can reasonably be expected to find and develop an exploit during the contest. Players get limited time to tweak what they've got in case it doesn't w
615.
by Canada 8y ago
Where it would be really great is mobile. It would make voice and video apps so much better if users who trust each other could directly connect without the latency adding rendezvous host. It would also need some sort of authenticated uPnP
616.
by Canada 8y ago
I really, really want it to work. I'm hopeful it will get better. I don't like PGP keyservers, they aren't very reliable, I wish I could remove all the old keys I've lost. And I don't like publishing my email addres
617.
by Canada 8y ago
Yeah, it makes a real mess. It generates random numbers of key pairs for each user, breaks subject line encryption randomly, and just generally sucks. I hope it gets better, but it’s definitely not something you want to enable at this time,
618.
by Canada 8y ago
I wish the everyone would stop using the term "responsible" to describe "coordinated" disclosure. Researchers do not owe vendors any cooperation at all. It is perfectly moral to present factual information without any no
619.
by Canada 8y ago
I’m not answering any questions. Just show me a table.
620.
by Canada 8y ago
I would call the ACLU or EFF and describe the situation. Nobody would even notice.
621.
by Canada 8y ago
I appreciate where you're coming from, and accept you're sincere in not desiring to base pricing on content, but users can't know that conclusively. I wouldn't want, and couldn't accept, my drafts being technically
622.
by Canada 8y ago
I like this a lot. It's immediately giving me a selection of alternative options, many of which are better than what I wrote. When the suggested options suck it often seems better to delete that fragment entirely. For zero effort it gi
623.
by Canada 8y ago
Would it be negative? Why do I care whose DNS records are also hosted there?
624.
by Canada 8y ago
What can they do? Strap you in front of it like it’s clockwork orange? You can refuse to respond to it. Cover your face with your hand and say “operator operator operator” or some other nonsense. Say it’s creepy or ridiculous to talk to suc
625.
by Canada 8y ago
Just like the evil TSA imaging systems, best thing to do is refuse to participate.
626.
by Canada 8y ago
Juicero definitely didn't commit fraud or mislead their investors. I'm not familiar with Clinkle, but it doesn't sound like blatant fraud either. Theranos and UBeam are scams like BitConnect.
627.
by Canada 8y ago
I was wondering, how can Kepler detect planets like Saturn that take decades to orbit, let alone planets like Uranus or Neptune? Wouldn't we need to be looking for 50 years at least in order to have enough observations to drawn meaning
628.
by Canada 8y ago
Reading the indictment, it sure sounds like the victim company employee was in on it. I wonder why "Employee 1" is not also charged. The press release makes it sound like the Chinese spy was soliciting company insiders to give tal
629.
by Canada 8y ago
In the case of BadBIOS there was no retraction. The person who claimed to have found it kept on insisting he did, but he never posted the malware. He just kept on making unverifiable claims and posting meaningless spectrograms and ignoring
630.
by Canada 8y ago
If I were writing the press release I’d definitely include at least one sentence describing what the conspirators dastardly plan was! From the PR it’s not even clear that an expert was knowingly involved in the plot.

More ›