Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
CalChris
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
63 ms
·
691.
▲
by
CalChris
5y ago
The Munger Graduate Residences do not have a CostCo for a penthouse.
692.
▲
by
CalChris
5y ago
Everyone should read Animal Farm and 1984 . I read the family copy of Animal Farm 8th grade summer, and we regularly quoted Animal Farm back and forth growing up. I later read Mikhail Bulgakov's Master and Margerita and enjoye
693.
▲
by
CalChris
5y ago
It's actually spelled Loop Stream Detector and it dates to the Core 2 processor family which is circa 2006. The LSD is described in section 3.4.2.4 of the Intel Optimization Manual, Optimizing the Loop Stream Detector (LSD). Anan
694.
▲
by
CalChris
5y ago
Debian announcement https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2017/06/msg00308.html Ahrefs writeup https://tech.ahrefs.com/skylake-bug-a-detective-story-ab1ad2... The Intel spec update still labe
695.
▲
by
CalChris
5y ago
Carlsen even plays the improved Bongcloud against Andrew Tang [1], #6 in the bullet ratings. [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_6Zl1jNWYQ [2] https://www.chess.com/leaderboard/live/bullet
696.
▲
by
CalChris
5y ago
He's kind of the Shiva Ayyadurai of hypertext.
697.
▲
by
CalChris
5y ago
Either llvm.org under Developer Meetings or the LLVM Youtube channel. The advantage of llvm.org is that it has a lot of the PDFs for the presentations as well as some old, pre-Youtube tutorials.
698.
▲
by
CalChris
5y ago
1. Getting Started with LLVM Core Libraries It's a bit dated (covers DAGISel rather than GlobalISel) but it gives a thorough introduction. 2. LLVM Developer Meeting tutorials These are really good although you'll have to put t
699.
▲
by
CalChris
5y ago
The compelling argument, rewarding innovation, is the same as it was in 1789, in the United States Constitution, Article I, Section 8, Clause 8: To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to author
700.
▲
by
CalChris
5y ago
Yeah, you're right. 64-Bit Mode Valid Thanks.
701.
▲
by
CalChris
5y ago
When x87+MMX were added, existing programs ran unchanged. When x86-64 doubled the register sets, many existing programs ran unchanged (some features were dropped). Compatibility was largely maintained. That compatibility was what AMD wagged
702.
▲
by
CalChris
5y ago
Tomasulo's register renaming algorithm (1967) comes from an era when you bought the computer and the operating system together. So OS compatibility was their problem. That's not our era but the resulting in-order vs out-of-order w
703.
▲
by
CalChris
5y ago
Adding more logical registers doesn't have to break application compatibility. Intel added x87, MMX ... extensions with their new register sets all without breaking compatibility. They even doubled the integer register set in x86_64 wi
704.
▲
by
CalChris
5y ago
> I'm curious why they have so many more physical registers than... logical? registers Register renaming allows instructions to be executed out-of-order [1] which allows for more instruction throughput. This goes back to 1967 and to
705.
▲
by
CalChris
5y ago
Cash For Clunkers was a brilliant idea given the economy, the one in free fall that W left Obama. BTW, it was overwhelming opposed by Republicans. That's because McConnell wanted Obama to be a one term president. Everyone wanted Gadaff
706.
▲
by
CalChris
5y ago
Obama inherited W's Great Recession with its 10% unemployment and its cratered tax revenues. This is similar to FDR inheriting Hoover's Great Depression. Obama spent his 8 years digging out of that hole. His one initiative was the
707.
▲
by
CalChris
5y ago
Yes, Clinton's budget, his tax increases and defense spending cuts, they did cost the Democrats the House. Gingrich voted against that budget, then campaigned against it, winning the Speakership, then shut the government down over it,
708.
▲
by
CalChris
5y ago
No, Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1 has nothing to do with the budget. It has to do with paying debts and collecting taxes. Article 1 Section 9 Clause 7 is closer. It says Congress has to pass an appropriation before spending money. That’s s
709.
▲
by
CalChris
5y ago
No, 70s inflation had nothing to do with Carter. Inflation in the 70s preceded Carter. There was the oil crisis. It preceded that. Nixon ordered price controls ... in 1970. No, 70s inflation had nothing to do with Carter's 'spendi
710.
▲
by
CalChris
5y ago
I can never remember whether Reagan single handedly won the Cold War on horseback with a six shooter or if he was functionally incapacitated and thus not responsible for anything.
711.
▲
by
CalChris
5y ago
He's partly right. Stagflation was another issue. Also Reagan was a natural actor, brainless but telegenic. The United States (Dulles) overthrew the democratically elected Mossadegh in 1953 and installed the Shah. Then Eisenhower, JFK,
712.
▲
by
CalChris
5y ago
The St. Louis Fed disagrees. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=IuLV
713.
▲
by
CalChris
5y ago
Yep, Reagan, H and W Bush took us from being the largest creditor nation to the largest debtor nation.
714.
▲
by
CalChris
5y ago
No, you aren't accounting for inflation. In constant 2012 dollars, US spending was $2T in 1977 and $2.2T in 1980. It was $3T in 1988. It was $3.5T in 1992. https://www.usgovernmentspending.com/spending_chart_1970_201...
715.
▲
by
CalChris
5y ago
Reagan cut taxes (supply side). Clinton increased taxes and cut Cold War era defense spending in his 1993 budget proposal. W didn't even put the Afghanistan and Iraq wars on normal budgeting. That emergency spending went straight to de
716.
▲
by
CalChris
5y ago
In fact, inflation was pretty bad under Nixon (5.8%) and Ford (11.05%) with some up and down. Nixon even instituted price controls in 1970. Carter inherited that economy. He didn't fix it (well, arguably his Fed Chair Paul Volcker did)
717.
▲
by
CalChris
5y ago
COLREGS, Rule 9, Narrow Channels, (b) A vessel of less than 20 meters in length or a sailing vessel shall not impede the passage of a vessel which can safely navigate only within a narrow channel or fairway. The CG was correct if a bit rude
718.
▲
by
CalChris
5y ago
First the container is sealed and it will float. At that point, it will be a hazard to surface navigation, and the Coast Guard, the Navy, ..., will try to recover them or sink them. Or the shipper will. Once the seals break down, the contai
719.
▲
by
CalChris
5y ago
In a restricted channel that isn't the case. If you see a triple E coming at you and you're in a dinghy, it will be in a channel and you will want to skedaddle; even the bow wave could swamp you. Usually it will have escorting tug
720.
▲
by
CalChris
5y ago
A deer weighs maybe pounds 100 lbs. A car weighs maybe 3000 lbs for a 30 to 1 ratio. That sub weighs 1000 times more than a container. That is how momentum works.
More ›