CUR10US

7 ms·

1. 31.▲
   by CUR10US 14y ago

   This still seems like pretty good protection for someone who has written an interpreter that performs "the best" vis-a-vis any clones. From the end user/customer's perspective, who cares how the function's interface/arguments are structure
2. 32.▲
   by CUR10US 14y ago

   Correction: Pathological love of Java and C++ What's that essay PG wrote on starting Viaweb with RM where he said potential competitors advertising for Java and C++ developers did not make them nervous?
3. 33.▲
   by CUR10US 14y ago

   Can the interpreter be protected by copyright? Technically that is a program, not the language.
4. 34.▲
   by CUR10US 14y ago

   So here's the question: Can you protect a computer language with copyright, e.g. a high level language like a scripting language?