CMay

27 ms·

211.
by CMay 1y ago
In the article it does talk about how they arrived at a partial solution that only worked on undirected graphs, but then they started taking a hybrid approach to get it to work on directed graphs. The paper also indicates it works on direct
212.
by CMay 1y ago
Maybe what they see is that most people who turn it off will leave it off, but some people turn it off and turn it back on as a part of a pattern/habit around temporarily putting files on OneDrive they don't want to scan. For exam
213.
by CMay 1y ago
I am aware that many companies train on illegally acquired content and that bothers me too. There is that initial phase of potential fair use within reason, but the illegal acquisition is still a crime. Eventually after they've distil
214.
by CMay 1y ago
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/group-photos-by-p...
215.
by CMay 1y ago
Because many people want it, expect it and value it. Most moms and old folks aren't going to fuss or understand privacy and technical considerations, they just want to search for things like "greenhouse" and find that old pho
216.
by CMay 1y ago
It's harder to find a reasonable use case to constantly opt-in and opt-out, incurring server side costs. Generally you either want it on or want it off. They do limit the cost of disabling it some, because they cache that data for 30
217.
by CMay 1y ago
A lot of people have a terabyte or more of OneDrive storage. Many people have gigantic photo collections. Analyzing and tagging photos is not free. Many people don't mind their photos actually being tagged, but they are a little more
218.
by CMay 1y ago
That's not an appeal to emotion, it's just being reasonable. It's super common for people to take a cynical interpretation of something and just run with it, because negativity bias goes zoom. Be less deterministic than that,
219.
by CMay 1y ago
Both enabling and disabling incur a cost (because they delete the data, but then have to recreate it), but they wouldn't want to punish you for enabling it so it makes sense that the limitation is on the disabling side.
220.
by CMay 1y ago
It's easy for people to forget that being overly emotionally invested in their argument can cloud their judgement. Most of us do it at some point, I am not immune, but if someone has any reasonability in them then it can actually help
221.
by CMay 1y ago
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/group-photos-by-p... "Microsoft collects, uses, and stores facial scans and biometric information from your photos through the OneDrive app for facial grouping techn
222.
by CMay 1y ago
Just because you can't personally think of a reason why the number shall be 3, and no more than 4, accepting that thou hast first counted 1 and 2, it doesn't mean that the reason is unthinkable. I feel like you're way too emo
223.
by CMay 1y ago
Can someone explain to me why the immediate perception is that this is some kind of bad, negative, evil thing? I don't understand it. My assumption is that when this feature is on and you turn it off, they end up deleting the tags (si
224.
by CMay 1y ago
Thanks! Any idea why I'm getting such poor performance on these new models? Whether Small or Tiny, on my 24GB 7900XTX I'm seeing like 8 tokens/s using the latest llama.cpp with vulkan. Even if it was running 4x faster than
225.
by CMay 1y ago
I absolutely know people who love companies and products. Like LOVE them, they will be put into tears like a child at Christmas, but they're adults. They grew up with them or their family members died and those companies or products
226.
by CMay 1y ago
On the other hand, their actual dependency list looks closer to this, and this is definitely not comprehensive: https://github.com/ionic-team/capacitor https://github.com/Microsoft/tslib https:&#
227.
by CMay 1y ago
> I fundamentally disagree with just about everything you've said Well, it's good to disagree. I mean, if you're wrong, you could get millions and millions killed. Hopefully you would agree that if there was a real risk
228.
by CMay 1y ago
The quote about the second amendment seems consistent with promoting life, because the second amendment helps protect all the others. It would be fair to argue that this requires nuance, because if someone commits murder with a gun, they a
229.
by CMay 1y ago
To be fair, Charlie Kirk was probably much higher profile than Hortman. Charlie traveled the nation widely, visited other countries and had online influence outside of his in-person visits. You could say many entertainers and politicians
230.
by CMay 1y ago
I think anyone who has the mental capacity to understand how something might be taken dangerously out of context and has any interest in being respectful should make some attempt to clarify these things. If they exclude critical informatio
231.
by CMay 1y ago
I posted this in another thread too, but it seemed relevant to respond here too. https://www.professorwatchlist.org/tags/anti-1st-amendment I just randomly clicked one of the professors in that list: - "Shaviro ha
232.
by CMay 1y ago
That website has a list of professors they claim were interfering with, educating against or are openly against free speech. https://www.professorwatchlist.org/tags/anti-1st-amendment I just randomly clicked one of the
233.
by CMay 1y ago
A lot of people make vague claims about this guy and then just let the various assumptions hang there as a form of decontextualized disinformation. What you're doing here is basically perpetuating the same kind of disinformation that
234.
by CMay 1y ago
Even if Tesla wasn't using LIDAR, I think they did still use radar and ultrasonic detection for a while, which I'm sure contributed to their models some.
235.
by CMay 1y ago
Your colon does not really solve ambiguity. They likely thought you meant "I love C: performance and security." which would make it more explicit, but it would also change the meaning and thus be incorrect. If I thought it was am
236.
by CMay 1y ago
The potential for misinterpretation didn't escape me, but I was also confident that there was sufficient context to understand it. An Oxford comma there would have suggested a more careful cadence if it were spoken, which is not what
237.
by CMay 1y ago
I love C, performance and security. Between this garbage collector and the capability enforcement, this is appealing. I've thought a few times about what a more secure C would look like, brushing over capability concepts here and the
238.
by CMay 1y ago
The post basically seems to be talking about grounding. Yes, it has enough procedural and behavioral knowledge about how things work that if you give it the critical pieces that are supposed to work together, it will do a decent job of tel
239.
by CMay 1y ago
Is this about the upcoming reveal of the autism findings, or is the article just feeding that as the cause? I thought the understanding for base rates of autism was that people are living longer and starting their lives later. Becoming fin
240.
by CMay 1y ago
Since the article is very low quality, let me try to fill in some context. In the US, our constitution's first amendment is taken fairly seriously (by many, not all): - https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution&#x2

More ›