Byamarro

6 ms·

31.
by Byamarro 2y ago
Yet you can remain conscious in deprivation chamber. I feel that this approach is too high level to technical details how brain may really work.
32.
by Byamarro 3y ago
Electron is something humans created to describe reality in a way that's comprehensible to us and at the same time we can observe via experiments that it is an accurate descriptions in a way that we can measure. Asking whether electron
33.
by Byamarro 3y ago
If it jumps across the universe uniformly then with each jump it can pull its surroundings as if there would be many electrons. Kind of like a single cpu core can run many programs "in parallel".
34.
by Byamarro 3y ago
"Fancy type systems" What about TypeScript? I've literally implemented snake game using types alone, it's quite powerful.
35.
by Byamarro 3y ago
I'm a complete layman, but it sounds awfully like that one problem I've once encountered on the Wikipedia: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explainable_artificial_intel...
36.
by Byamarro 3y ago
It frustrates me every time when people talk about consciousness. The word has several meanings, but very often people just use it without specifying which consciousness do do they talk about and then proceed to conflate all the types of th
37.
by Byamarro 3y ago
TS' type system is insane in what it's capable of expressing. I've personally wrote a snake game using types alone (you see a board, snake and snacks inside your editor type popups). Despite that, TS is still quite cumbersome
38.
by Byamarro 3y ago
Genuine question, what's bad about FP in your opinion? Do you disagree with using any of its parts or the general approach where people try to force a completely pure FP? Is using .map operator already too much? Where do you draw the l
39.
by Byamarro 3y ago
Incredible, it's like having perfectly typed language without having to use types at all. Few worries from my side: - TypeScript gained traction partially because you could migrate an existing codebase to it. Does leporello support gra
40.
by Byamarro 3y ago
As a web developer, I'm curious - what kind of projects are you talking about and what kind of solutions did you witness being implemented as a result of the creator having knowledge in this area?
41.
by Byamarro 3y ago
The question is also whether it's meaningful to polish our deeply mathematical models to scales so extreme that we may have troubles in reaching them. Keep in mind that this is just some model of reality, not necessarily how reality tr
42.
by Byamarro 3y ago
Could you elaborate on the project? I'm curious
43.
by Byamarro 4y ago
That probably depends on the area where you want to live in. Check for job postings in the area you consider, see what language is used the most
44.
by Byamarro 4y ago
This is such a valid point. I've experienced it myself. When you're on a team, after some time team members start developing shared biases. It's enough that some previous discussion was railroaded certain way to make it harde
45.
by Byamarro 4y ago
Most tests shouldn't be hard to read and reason about so it shouldn't be a problem. In case of more complex tests, you can do it like you would do it during iterative development - debug tests and code to figure out what's wr
46.
by Byamarro 4y ago
These are even bigger (20cm/8in): https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenophyophorea
47.
by Byamarro 4y ago
It could be possible with analog chips. I.e. ones that Mythic works on.
48.
by Byamarro 4y ago
We still did conclude how gravity more or less works while being within gravitational field.
49.
by Byamarro 4y ago
We did discover though that the Earth is not the center of the universe without leaving it. Then with Newton we could learn where the arrangement of planets come from. Then Einstein developed further the knowledge about gravity without le
50.
by Byamarro 5y ago
Objects are always treated as a reference, primitives as a value. To say they're immutable requires a bit more of a context - immutable in what sense? You can reassign a different value to a variable that stores a primitive, so it&#x27
51.
by Byamarro 5y ago
What's worth nothing, nowadays most of the concepts "that are too hard for web developers" In the quote are already part of frontend programming. Concurrency - web workers Compilers - technically you can write compiler, but i
52.
by Byamarro 5y ago
Webgl is tho. But even in 2d context api, you have bigger control over how your content is being printed than in html. Which means that a lot of operations that DOM performs unnecessarily in the context of Google docs can be simply discarde
53.
by Byamarro 6y ago
Because it's a waste of money and time
54.
by Byamarro 6y ago
I'm not a historian, but afaik this order used to own Malta as a whole so it's likely due to historical reasons coming from this fact.
55.
by Byamarro 6y ago
I see no problem if more paradigms would be pushed into mainstream. Not so long ago, functional paradigm had its comeback and it improved quality of the code in i.e. JavaScript world. The thing is to not be a purist, and mix paradigms in th