Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Buge
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
29 ms
·
241.
▲
by
Buge
8y ago
dnautics and TylerE were talking about the 10k/day boundary. If your reply isn't about the 10k/day boundary, then I think you misunderstood them.
242.
▲
by
Buge
8y ago
Any test with a normally non-hit timeout anywhere is nondeterministic, because the operating system could schedule your test very slowly causing it to hit the timeout.
243.
▲
by
Buge
8y ago
Are you saying the law advantages providers with over 10k/day and hurts providers with under 10k/day? I don't understand how that could be. The law doesn't apply to providers with under 10k/day, so they should have
244.
▲
by
Buge
8y ago
How many times do you run the tests? I've had tests that only fail about 1/200 times or less.
245.
▲
by
Buge
8y ago
Bing was released in 2009, so if this was in 2006 it must have been one of Bing's predecessors.
246.
▲
by
Buge
8y ago
The title is false. This isn't a new study. This is from 2018.
247.
▲
by
Buge
8y ago
"Negative media attention about a thing, better ban it" seems like a fairly simple explanation to me.
248.
▲
by
Buge
8y ago
I never claimed it wasn't crap, I said it's hard to tax imports of it.
249.
▲
by
Buge
8y ago
The Mozilla developer has an @chromium.org email address?
250.
▲
by
Buge
8y ago
By "stuff" I was actually referring to digital products, digital technology, websites, technology companies, etc. An import tax on those would be harder than for physical products.
251.
▲
by
Buge
8y ago
Amazon Echo and Google Home only send data to the servers when they detect the wake word. That's a lot different than sending everything.
252.
▲
by
Buge
8y ago
If we want stuff to be made in America instead of China, we should increase the number of skilled immigrants allowed in.
253.
▲
by
Buge
8y ago
I don't see how my previous comment was confused. It was drawing a distinction between "server wage" and what Instacart is doing. I never claimed "server wage" laws apply to this situation. Also, the term "wage
254.
▲
by
Buge
8y ago
Yes, minimum wage for servers is lower than for people who don't get tips. But it's still illegal to lower a person's wage below what was advertised because the person got a tip.
255.
▲
by
Buge
8y ago
I wouldn't call it E2E encryption if only one party in the world has the key. E2E generally means both sides have the encryption key. But lolc points out the real problem with that scheme.
256.
▲
by
Buge
8y ago
Scraping urls doesn't make you a great hacker.
257.
▲
by
Buge
8y ago
Yes, but the overturn wasn't based on urls, or scraping, or disclosure, or security, or damages, it was based on him being charged in the wrong state. The court system still thinks everything else about the case was fine.
258.
▲
by
Buge
8y ago
I thought Google got rid of the real name policy https://www.zdnet.com/article/google-reverses-real-names-pol...
259.
▲
by
Buge
8y ago
Weev found that certain urls had private AT&T user information on them, and scraped them to get 114k users' information. Then he notified a journalist and sent the information to the journalist as proof. He was found to have done $
260.
▲
by
Buge
8y ago
How would E2E encryption stop a modified client? E2E protects against MITM. But we're not talking about MITM.
261.
▲
by
Buge
8y ago
What password manager do you use that uses TOTP?
262.
▲
by
Buge
8y ago
The phrase "can be phished" seems inaccurate, because that Chrome vulnerability has been fixed. https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=818592
263.
▲
by
Buge
8y ago
2FA by itself protects you against credential stuffing and other password reuse based attacks. It doesn't in general protect against phishing. U2F protects against phishing.
264.
▲
by
Buge
8y ago
TOTP is just as vulnerable to phishing as SMS. If you want phishing protection, use U2F.
265.
▲
by
Buge
8y ago
Twitter names @internetlord @defeat @tragic and @spared Those seem like some pretty high value names. Although internetlord and tragic don't look like what I'd expect a swatter's account to look like. They don't appear v
266.
▲
by
Buge
8y ago
If you limit the number of places that can have the machines then it's less likely people will stumble upon them during day to day activity. People would have to deliberately drive to a casino to get them. Taxing higher also helps to r
267.
▲
by
Buge
8y ago
>His sister reported him to the police and 'content stored on the encrypted hard drive matched file hashes for known child pornography content'. If that's evidence enough to hold him in jail indefinitely then it's evi
268.
▲
by
Buge
8y ago
I thought Content ID just referred to the automated content recognition system, not to manually claimed things. That article you linked to seems to agree. So the video in this post seems to be primarily not about Content ID.
269.
▲
by
Buge
8y ago
I think it's a cat and mouse game. The more that Linkedin publishes about their anti-spam techniques, the more information spammers have to try to evade those anti-spam techniques.
270.
▲
by
Buge
8y ago
iMacros is a legit extension. But yeah, I guess there are recruiters using it to spam people.
More ›