Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Borealid
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
121.
▲
by
Borealid
8mo ago
Can Netbird run the DNS resolver (so it can be used for the internal domain ONLY by systemd-resolved) but not alter the host's DNS settings? It looks to me like the setting that tells Netbird to leave the system DNS alone is arbitraril
122.
▲
by
Borealid
8mo ago
https://codeberg.org/bg443/JetBird appears to use the same core library (and is just a different Android frontend wrapper).
123.
▲
by
Borealid
8mo ago
I cannot imagine a way to connect a cellular modem that provides a smaller surface area than USB ACM. There is no direct memory access and no way for the modem to directly access other devices. Could you perhaps elaborate on what the more-s
124.
▲
by
Borealid
8mo ago
Originally you were positing that phishing (specifically password phishing) was not preventable. Now you are arguing that by restricting users' permissions it is possible to move along the security gradient, potentially to a point wher
125.
▲
by
Borealid
8mo ago
The public key is in fact signed by Intel and uniquely serialized to the TPM. If the game manufacturer requires TPM register values that match Windows, it will not run under Proton/Wine (or a Windows VM). If they allow TPM register val
126.
▲
by
Borealid
8mo ago
How would you define it if: - the DRM/delivery software is open source - the game payload is sent to you encrypted using the public key of a secure enclave on your computer - while the game runs all its memory is symmetrically encrypte
127.
▲
by
Borealid
8mo ago
I think a passkey is a good example of how, when the user has a trusted third party grant them limited instead of unlimited permission to do something (e.g. they can use a secret with the site that created it but they can't extract the
128.
▲
by
Borealid
8mo ago
Homes are routinely heated with the largest available particle accelerator - the sun.
129.
▲
by
Borealid
8mo ago
You can't provide a passkey to a malicious site without writing your own web browser. And the "password" is a 128-bit integer. It completely solves the phishing-password-stealing problem.
130.
▲
by
Borealid
9mo ago
But with standard S3, the OS can't install Patch Tuesday updates like this without your intervention while suspended! S2idle lets it do that regardless of hardware-level alarm support.
131.
▲
by
Borealid
10mo ago
What happens in the event of a hash collision?
132.
▲
by
Borealid
10mo ago
The Phonemax R4 GT uses a 4.3" screen and was released this year. There are not many, but there are not zero either.
133.
▲
by
Borealid
10mo ago
You didn't correct the hands being backwards? It gave you a man with six fingers on his right hand, and four fingers on his left.
134.
▲
by
Borealid
10mo ago
Perhaps it would raise your hackles less if you read the Youtube comment as "improve video clarity at a particular file size", rather than how you presumably read it as "improve video clarity [with no regard for how big the r
135.
▲
by
Borealid
10mo ago
Noise is, because of its random nature, inherently less compressible than a predictable signal. So counterintuitively, noise reduction improves compression ratios. In fact many video codecs are about determining which portion of the video I
136.
▲
by
Borealid
10mo ago
You are saying that Bazzite failed to install itself?
137.
▲
by
Borealid
10mo ago
Bazzite has a command, `ujust setup-boot-windows-steam`, which when run adds an entry to Steam-in-Bazzite that causes a Windows boot. It also has a command `ujust regenerate-grub` which adds a Windows entry to the bootloader. Each of these
138.
▲
by
Borealid
11mo ago
I am telling you my own preferences, as a native speaker of English. I would rather read my coworkers' original output in their voice than read someone else's writing (including a machine edit of their own text).
139.
▲
by
Borealid
11mo ago
Is it possible the same problems that cause you to write less-readable words also lead you to choose poor AI outputs? If no, why not? Personally I would rather read a human's output than their selection of machine outputs.
140.
▲
by
Borealid
11mo ago
I think you're missing the key point about return types with checked exceptions. `int thing()` in Java returns type `int`. `int thing() throws AnException` in Java returns type `int | AnException`, with language-mandated destructuring
141.
▲
by
Borealid
11mo ago
Try: Either<Foo, SomeException> x; try { x = Either.left(foo().bar().baz().car()); } catch (SomeException e) { x = Either.right(e); } I have rewritten the parent code to preserve the exception with
142.
▲
by
Borealid
11mo ago
The only difference between a `fun doThing: Result<X, SomeError>` and a `fun doThing: X throws SomeError` is that with the checked exception, unpacking of the result is mandatory. You're still free to wrap the X or SomeError into
143.
▲
by
Borealid
1y ago
Games run pretty great on Linux, but if you do want a VM, passing through a graphics card to that VM via vfio provides 95%+ the performance of native. Virtual reality headsets with dual 4K screens running at 75Hz+ perform well on a Windows
144.
▲
by
Borealid
1y ago
Let's imagine, hypothetically speaking, that demand is perfectly inelastic. The price of a good is $10, and buyers will absolutely refuse to pay more than $10 under any circumstances. Before a tariff is imposed, the seller sells the go
145.
▲
by
Borealid
1y ago
As an example of something lineage allows me to do which graphene forbids: Lineage allows me, the owner of my phone, to use an app of my choice to serve as a location provider. Graphene requires that I use google services (sandboxed) and do
146.
▲
by
Borealid
1y ago
No, I'm specifically referring to iptables-based firewalls (like AFWall), which Graphene does not allow the user to create and Lineage does (via root access). These are not an android VPN provider and allow blocking traffic based on th
147.
▲
by
Borealid
1y ago
Let's define "more secure" as "preventing a particular behavior that is against the device owner's conscious or unconscious wishes". It would be "more secure" to have a per-application firewall that b
148.
▲
by
Borealid
1y ago
I think that's how it's intended to be read. If you allow yourself to make money from the code, you're accepting liability for it. If you choose not to accept money in exchange for it, you don't have to accept liability.
149.
▲
by
Borealid
1y ago
I don't know where you've got those numbers, but they're wrong. https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1n79udw/inferen... seems comparable to the Framework Desktop and reputable - th
150.
▲
by
Borealid
1y ago
Did you casually glance at how the hardware in the Framework Desktop (Strix Halo) works before commenting?
More ›