Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
BoppreH
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
31.
▲
by
BoppreH
3mo ago
> because people in my business are very active in sending the whole history in EACH mail, Unfortunately that quoted history is not easily navigable and doesn't include attachments. > there is a setting with the server-confg, whi
32.
▲
by
BoppreH
3mo ago
Which one do you use? I'm really curious if there's an alternative workflow that is just as good as GMail-view, or people just learn to accept the limitations.
33.
▲
by
BoppreH
3mo ago
I had seen both of these. The add-on implementation is too complicated and affects too many systems (contacts, attachments, etc) that change frequently, so it had many subtle bugs and unimplemented features: https://github.com&#x
34.
▲
by
BoppreH
3mo ago
I had tried this, but the grouping only happened among messages of each folder. And Sent is a separate folder, so it doesn't get included. Or did I miss something? Do you see your replies in the threaded view?
35.
▲
by
BoppreH
3mo ago
I tried Thunderbird recently, and was baffled that there seemed to be no way to see received emails grouped with my responses to them (aka threading or conversations). Even grouping incoming emails that have the same subject seemed like an
36.
▲
by
BoppreH
3mo ago
It's just a syllable of the whole name, which is a German surname in a certain old dialect. And its pronunciation has been mangled after 150 in a country that can't pronounce it properly, so it's a mess all around.
37.
▲
by
BoppreH
3mo ago
"Sh" to "s" is simple enough. Sounds horrible to my ears, but maybe not to someone named Stavros ;). I've also been told that the double-p of Boppre looks alien in Greek. And the "hu" syllable (like the so
38.
▲
by
BoppreH
3mo ago
In my experience, every compound given name is made of very traditional names (with some specific combos like Roberto Antonio and Maria Eduarda being especially popular), so it has always been clear where the given name stops. Though I woul
39.
▲
by
BoppreH
3mo ago
I'm obliged to mention Falsehoods Programmer Believe About Names: https://www.kalzumeus.com/2010/06/17/falsehoods-programmers-... . As someone who also has two family names, I always dread questions for
40.
▲
by
BoppreH
3mo ago
Dropped a folder with a small HTML project, and after 20 seconds got "Something went wrong. An unexpected error occurred. Please try again or contact support.". Note how the error has zero information. Looking in the network tab
41.
▲
by
BoppreH
3mo ago
Be careful with new image formats because they also have to be supported by the rest of the user's workflow. The browser might display it, but if it cannot be added to the photos app, or it's not understood by their image editor,
42.
▲
by
BoppreH
3mo ago
It could have been as simple as "noise infusion" being interpreted as "adding fake data". Especially if you don't trust the people adding the noise. Wouldn't be the first administrative action taken at a keywor
43.
▲
by
BoppreH
4mo ago
This is actually useful for smartphones. Sometimes smartphone malware is capable of infecting a device but not persisting, so reboots clean it back up. At least if you trust the NSA's advice: https://s3.documentcloud.org
44.
▲
by
BoppreH
4mo ago
> The situation on the ground is unchanged - the amount of labor being generated per person has not really changed, but the overall pie has grown massively around us. My understanding is that "fixed" costs like rent and groceri
45.
▲
by
BoppreH
4mo ago
So when Google bans someone, that person also loses access to all services that require digital ID, forever? I remember when a Youtuber asked live viewers to "vote" by typing emojis, and a whole bunch of viewers got their Google
46.
▲
by
BoppreH
4mo ago
Rockets famously take exponential amounts of fuel to reach higher speeds. I'm a layman, but my guess is that this comes from the exhaust speed being fixed. Orbital speed is higher than exhaust speed, so from a frame at rest the rocket
47.
▲
by
BoppreH
4mo ago
I also found it surprisingly easy, starting from my triple "olden, party, music" (calculated years ago for state space coverage and memorability). Followed by "fight", then either "shark, brash" or "brash,
48.
▲
by
BoppreH
4mo ago
Good point, maybe that could be done. But that's not what TFA is about, so you're not vindicated yet.
49.
▲
by
BoppreH
4mo ago
Videos are inherently large. There are better compression algorithms than what phone cameras generate by default, but video reencoding is slow, and the results still too large for "covert data channels". Normal players would have
50.
▲
by
BoppreH
4mo ago
> it compiles photogrammetry by placing pokemons at areas and angles with low image coverage But that's not what happened. The data came from very explicit scanning tasks centered about pokestops, not the AR pokemon capture. I use
51.
▲
by
BoppreH
4mo ago
Oh, that's clever. It's not just hiding the payload in the Exif, it's hiding the fact that the payload came from the network at all, by reading it from the browser cache (presumably after embedding the image into a page the u
52.
▲
by
BoppreH
4mo ago
You're right that shareholder mindset cannot fix this problem, but that's what policy and agreements are for. And leaders can be convinced that AI is a direct risk to their own citizens too. If everyone else agrees to stop, you ha
53.
▲
by
BoppreH
4mo ago
In 2023 there was an open letter titled "Pause Giant AI Experiments", signed by almost all the big names on the West. I'd say the public opinion only got worse since then.
54.
▲
by
BoppreH
4mo ago
Implied in my answer was " and not creating ever stronger AIs ", which unfortunately the big 3 labs are failing at. And they might be hampering their own revenue by doing the rest, but they also know that rocking the boat too hard
55.
▲
by
BoppreH
4mo ago
Not the direct person you asked, but my answer would be alignment, interpretability, and policymaking. Perhaps improving existing usage? Helping grandma create reminders doesn't require advancing the AI state-of-the-art.
56.
▲
by
BoppreH
4mo ago
> I don't buy the superintelligence package It's the same deal as Quantum Computers breaking crypto. Maybe there's an 80% chance of it never happening, but when you multiply that remaining 20% by the potential impact...
57.
▲
by
BoppreH
4mo ago
I think the standard answer is "yes, the consequence of noncompliance is bombing the datacenters, but it wouldn't happen because China also understands why we shouldn't build it".
58.
▲
by
BoppreH
4mo ago
Even the (SOTA LLM) open source models are trained with huge clusters. Datacenters are also hugely expensive and complicated. Or you can take one step back and look at chip allocation. As far as I know there are only three companies on the
59.
▲
by
BoppreH
4mo ago
True, but look at nuclear tests. There used to be around 50 tests every year, for decades. Now the only nuclear tests in the last 27 years were the six done by North Korea[1]. And there's still only nine countries with any nuclear weap
60.
▲
by
BoppreH
4mo ago
We, globally, can stop it. It has worked (so far) for nuclear disarmament, and could work for training large models. I know that policing the usage of computer clusters is not a popular opinion in technical forums, but something has to be d
More ›