BobbyJo

64 ms·

961.
by BobbyJo 4y ago
San Francisco, the government, owes the constituents it's meant to serve, and whom pay its taxes, literally everything. San Francisco, the city and community, as a society, owes what anyone in the world owes everyone else: an ethical e
962.
by BobbyJo 4y ago
> They said the instigator bears some responsibility, you replied the majority of the responsibility lies with the one whose mind was changed. These views do not seem in opposition to me. I'm saying you bear no responsibility for
963.
by BobbyJo 4y ago
No. Parent was saying you have to weigh the consequences of changing someone's mind. That's the part I disagree with, unless of course they're children. You shouldn't censor your ideas for fear of harming adults, in the
964.
by BobbyJo 4y ago
I have to disagree with this point in this context. "Changing someone's mind" is a collaborative act. If you change someone's mind about something important, they are more responsible for the change than you are, becau
965.
by BobbyJo 4y ago
Cost. The "cost" of all of those things is "too high" for the average American, as evidenced by the reaction to such proposals. So, we gotta do something else.
966.
by BobbyJo 4y ago
> Where we can have discussions, and probably for a long and fun if not necessarily fruitful time, is whether it's "good" or "bad" from market's, or consumer's perspective for companies to go bad. I per
967.
by BobbyJo 4y ago
> It's bad for a company to go bad. Hard disagree, so I wonder what your basis for this bullet is. Agree on the other two though.
968.
by BobbyJo 4y ago
I agree with most of your points in principle, with a caveat. Harming another's feelings does constitute harm, but there is the confounding matter of how much responsibility we place on the individual to avoid such harms. Somewhere bet
969.
by BobbyJo 4y ago
> I quite like the idea that prejudice becomes race/sex/whateverism when used to cause harm. That's bit icky, because "causes harm" is extremely relative. Any negative attitude (or the shadow of a positive one) c
970.
by BobbyJo 4y ago
The post is about the experience of grief in response to internalizing the scale of earth and the negative human impact thereon. You responded to a post that implicitly shrugged off the negative impacts as inevitable or necessary with &quot
971.
by BobbyJo 4y ago
Your flippancy about mass extinction leads me to believe you aren't internalizing any of the suffering therein, or the loss. Extinction happens, and, more broadly, death happens. However, we don't stand and deliver a eulogy compos
972.
by BobbyJo 4y ago
I'm curious as to what differentiates cannabis from other psychedelics such that you think there is a healthy path to it and not to anything else. I personally think turning to psychedelics as form of subjective exploration is perfectl
973.
by BobbyJo 4y ago
Specifically, Mark has allowed Facebooks mission to change from "giving people the power to build community and bring the world closer together" to "optimize ad revenue from a pre-existing group of users", and is now doi
974.
by BobbyJo 4y ago
Is there a difference between someone being charged with a crime for a joke, or simply having the joke removed from the platform it was posted to? I tend to think so. I think platform censorship is a completely different beast than governme
975.
by BobbyJo 4y ago
I you aren't a user, or have never been close to a user in any capacity, odds are there is much that "you don't know you don't know."
976.
by BobbyJo 4y ago
I think 'bad batches' can also refer to 'abnormally strong' batches. What normally causes overdoses, in my experience, is the inconsistent strength of black market narcotics.
977.
by BobbyJo 4y ago
Define "domain". You can have tons of experience in a single domain across many jobs. In fact, I would wager that working in the same domain with differing groups of people, toward differing requirements, gives you a richer unders
978.
by BobbyJo 4y ago
NSA probably wishes they could hire stoners.
979.
by BobbyJo 4y ago
Not saying this with regard to this situation specifically, but personally I'd be fine with banning one word criticisms. They tend to be imprecisely used, which is a major problem when talking about hot button issues. Most arguments ar
980.
by BobbyJo 4y ago
Not if they can't pay it off, and need to roll over said debt, which is the case with the national debt.
981.
by BobbyJo 4y ago
> L5 is about transport, where everything can be 10-100x more efficient if everyone is FSD. But if even 1% decide to take the wheel then it's instant gridlock everywhere. If that were true we'd never get to L5. We'd need a
982.
by BobbyJo 4y ago
Grew up in Brevard county and still swing through from time to time!
983.
by BobbyJo 4y ago
Gainesville. Hi-o!
984.
by BobbyJo 4y ago
I can't wait until these kinds of tools are usable live. I'd love open worlds with unique character interactions and scenery. I'm always incredibly disappointed when I've exhausted a game's content or when portions
985.
by BobbyJo 4y ago
I don't think any proposals have been obstructed on the grounds that opposed neighborhoods felt like more facilities should accompany the shelters in their neighborhood. I'd be satisfied to see that though.
986.
by BobbyJo 4y ago
Hence the need to spread the population out into everyone's neighborhood, rather than strong arming under represented, low-income populations, and forcing them to take the entire burden in their neighborhood.
987.
by BobbyJo 4y ago
I was choosing one word to refer to a contiguous population of people. I could have chosen to call them formerly-homeless, but the distinction felt moot, because typically we are referring to people unable to provide their own shelter as ho
988.
by BobbyJo 4y ago
> There is nothing contradictory about wanting to solve homelessness and wanting them out of your neighborhood Yes there is. If you want them housed, but not in your neighborhood, then you either want them out in a forest somewhere, or y
989.
by BobbyJo 4y ago
Do abortion clinics accept crypto now?
990.
by BobbyJo 4y ago
I'm not getting that implication. They are saying that, on occasion, HR tries to shove a resume down his throat on the basis of race/sexuality when the applicant is lacking experience. That, in no way, leads me to extrapolate any

More ›