Bnjoroge

6 ms·

91.
by Bnjoroge 4mo ago
pretty cool but docker support is a no-brainer. not having it is a deal-breaker
92.
by Bnjoroge 4mo ago
congrats! how does this compare to turbopuffer, surreal or other multi-model ones built on object storage or not
93.
by Bnjoroge 4mo ago
Yes. That’s possible in addition to using your actual subscription. I’ve been using it via cliproxy for all harnesses and even my own code review agent hooked up to github apps. Not banned yet but I also dont do crazy stuff with openclaw or
94.
by Bnjoroge 4mo ago
Docker isn’t a serious sandboxing strategy
95.
by Bnjoroge 5mo ago
an even lazier comment
96.
by Bnjoroge 5mo ago
definitely doesnt is a strong word. it technically is possible, but you might get banned
97.
by Bnjoroge 5mo ago
Works well for very well defined task. If you have a really big feature like a front end migration, you can use /plan, and /goal which i think is in most harnesses. You can also use other tools that allow your agent to interact wi
98.
by Bnjoroge 5mo ago
Lmao
99.
by Bnjoroge 5mo ago
Or your lazy excuse is an even more convenient thing to blame
100.
by Bnjoroge 5mo ago
What are “box-hours”? Regular hours just running in boxes? Do I get charged the same when 1)the agent is doing some external thing say web search that takes a while, and 2) when the agent isnt running(say waiting for my input)?
101.
by Bnjoroge 5mo ago
This is heavily vibecoded, and probably the 100th iteration of sandboxes. In any case, docker isn’t a serious isolation boundary for agents.
102.
by Bnjoroge 5mo ago
No it’s not unless you’ve never interacted with people in other industries. It’s just as bad there, unless you have specific reasons for tech
103.
by Bnjoroge 5mo ago
That makes no sense. They didnt provide any specific reasons they dont like the tech industry. All of their reasons can be applied to just about any industry lmao. The core issue is and always will be capitalism
104.
by Bnjoroge 5mo ago
None of that is specific to this industry. It’s far worse in others. Grass always looks greener elsewhere
105.
by Bnjoroge 5mo ago
Agree on both counts. Mimo seemed to have reduced their prices significantly so if it’s comparable to deepseek v4 pro, it’s a much better value
106.
by Bnjoroge 5mo ago
I use Tailscale with orbstack machines which allows me to run two tailnets at once($dayjob and homelab). Both great products. https://bnjoroge.com/posts/connecting-to-multiple-tailscale-...
107.
by Bnjoroge 5mo ago
Have you seen https://deepswe.datacurve.ai/blog ? This is the closest to a vibe check i’ve felt even with the open models.
108.
by Bnjoroge 5mo ago
For long-running tasks, yes 4.7 has been a noticeable improvement. Goes off the rails alot less than 4.6 does. For shorter-sized windows, I havent felt as much and agree that the harness improvements have been fhe biggest lever
109.
by Bnjoroge 5mo ago
I imagine it’s also really trivial to build some kind of local “enterprise” proxy that gives you the same visibility in usage as the anthropic dashboard would give you. I use one for aggregating all my subs.
110.
by Bnjoroge 5mo ago
Yup. Just shows me that they are either oblivious about how much better they’ve gotten or simply unaware. Either way, hard to take their opinions seriously
111.
by Bnjoroge 5mo ago
Gitlab’s UI is extremely terrible. It’s hard to even explain how bad it is.
112.
by Bnjoroge 5mo ago
Do you review your dependencies’ entire code?
113.
by Bnjoroge 5mo ago
There’s a big difference between vibe coding and agentic engineering. If you think they are at all the same thing, you need to update your priors
114.
by Bnjoroge 5mo ago
I dont think that holds since the core cuda toolkit is proprietary
115.
by Bnjoroge 5mo ago
You only need about a mac w 96GB or 128gb to run deepseek v4flash with ds4( https://github.com/antirez/ds4 ). Works mostly well
116.
by Bnjoroge 5mo ago
Subs are absolutely available to businesses. There’s metered plans for ghe equivalent consumer plan.
117.
by Bnjoroge 6mo ago
whoops yea, my bad.
118.
by Bnjoroge 6mo ago
It is not difficult to believe that the frustration of racist people seeing black people more successful contributed to it. In fact, it's the most obvious and straightforward explanation for it, given the fact that it's 1)1921, 4
119.
by Bnjoroge 6mo ago
you are incredibly naive, ignorant or oblivious if you dont think a primary reason was because of their race in TULSA in 1921. Cmon man -read some history
120.
by Bnjoroge 6mo ago
honestly the entire country up until maybe 40 or so years ago

More ›