Blahah

15 ms·

151.
by Blahah 3y ago
Perhaps you don't understand what a wiki is, but there are hundreds or more implementations of every reasonable etymological interpretation of the term. If you have a particular narrow version of it, that's not universal or helpfu
152.
by Blahah 3y ago
Yeah, because utility theory is not how people think. Give most people a puzzle that allows for significant gain if you answer correctly, or simply not being harmed if you answer suboptimally, and most people try to escape what they correct
153.
by Blahah 3y ago
It's not exciting. Sorry. The services that identify ip addresses are using the same data as you. If someone using a provider is identifiable with their shitty heuristics, they will label them. If not it's labelled as the provider
154.
by Blahah 3y ago
Twitch doesn't own any streaming infrastructure, it's all cloud providers. If it's being labelled as twitch it's because twitch dominated that subnet of their cloud provider for a while. You should consider that "lo
155.
by Blahah 3y ago
Are you looking to avoid the js tooling ecosystem? As in, just an html file with script tags is fine?
156.
by Blahah 3y ago
Not quite sure what you mean by normal. But if you want a nice input field - as in it allows you to input text and does what you expect with plain text, something like water.css maybe. If you want rich text, the Web was designed to offload
157.
by Blahah 3y ago
Confusing - what about the free github and gitlab wikis? And all the free wiki hosts? And tiddlywiki which has been freely hosted tons of places for 20 years or so?
158.
by Blahah 3y ago
That's true only because mediawiki is designed for the infrastructure of a previous era, and massively overengineered for these kinds of use cases. Use any of the many free solutions for hosting a free site now. Use tiddlywiki in a sin
159.
by Blahah 3y ago
Not sure why that seems like a challenge, but it's trivial since 2001. Use a codeblock.
160.
by Blahah 3y ago
The FBI baited his child into a crime. Most people probably expect their government not to lure their children to danger, but to guide them to safety. Your response makes it sound like the kid's behaviour is what the father didn't
161.
by Blahah 3y ago
Luckily it's for LLMs, not openai
162.
by Blahah 3y ago
They were, in a much less constrained way, until companies running platforms started suing people for scraping. And investing heavily in making it difficult technically. The difference is advertising. The vast majority of people do not want
163.
by Blahah 3y ago
That's a good argument against ads, because ads introduce a fundamental misalignment of incentives between the platform and the user. There are many ways reddit could build a collaborative business from their current situation. Adverti
164.
by Blahah 3y ago
You can split inference between CPU and GPU using whatever available GPU vRAM with llama.cpp. And you can run many small models with 4GB of vRAM. Anything with 3B parameters quantized to 4bit should be fine.
165.
by Blahah 3y ago
It sounds like you've got a working solution already - is that right? If so, the old adage "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" applies. Beyond that, if you're looking at whether to use these technologies in enhan
166.
by Blahah 3y ago
https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.10149 maybe
167.
by Blahah 3y ago
Of course they can. Fog doesn't block mid-IR.
168.
by Blahah 3y ago
https://archive.is/neUxt
169.
by Blahah 3y ago
> I think it's the different point size (or whatever that word is for the horizontal height lines that fonts live within). Agreed! The x-height [0] (among other things) differs jarringly between the serif and sans fonts used. 0: ht
170.
by Blahah 3y ago
You are making an assumption that seems very strange to me - that the license matters for important use cases. It doesn't. Access to the technology is the only important factor, because nothing interesting about AI involves commerciali
171.
by Blahah 3y ago
The question was why not, and the answer was because it's more risky. Why would Nate Silver want to do all the things you correctly listed as options when he can simply use the safer, more simple, free gmail option?
172.
by Blahah 3y ago
That opens a surprisingly large landscape of possible attacks and failure modes. The jsit obvious subset being things that happen when your paid gsuite gets disabled (not paying, abuse report, etc), or the domain lapses or is taken over. A
173.
by Blahah 3y ago
They either get reworked in a chop shop, stripped for parts and then the remainder used for scrap, or they get shipped abroad for resale
174.
by Blahah 3y ago
The GP also posted the item to HN. They said the title is a reduced version of the quote. I was pointing out that it's not an accurate one. Edit: the title has since been corrected, so my comments no are no longer relevant
175.
by Blahah 3y ago
What about the people who haven't?
176.
by Blahah 3y ago
The second part of the title, after the comma, says the opposite of what your quote says.
177.
by Blahah 3y ago
Because none of the interesting things I want to do with LLMs have anything to do with commercial uses. And because I don't care what a license says when I'm doing stuff in private. I just case whether I am practically able to do
178.
by Blahah 4y ago
Can you explain the implications of this for people who aren't expert in the field?
179.
by Blahah 4y ago
FYI mullvad vpn works for sign up. I'm from the UK but currently travelling and it allowed me to join.
180.
by Blahah 4y ago
> Maybe! You have no way of knowing which ones. "Which ones are true" is far less relevant to my life than "which ones are relevant". I simply have no use for the information about who blew up the Nord pipeline, or ho

More ›