Bjartr

23 ms·

391.
by Bjartr 2y ago
On the timescales of the biosphere (thousands of years) the vast majority of plastics will break down and hydrocarbons bound in them will be as bioavailable (probably moreso) than they were originally. And on the timescales evolution can op
392.
by Bjartr 2y ago
> they are games, not oil refinery simulators. That's an excellent point. I do feel compelled to mention the exception of oil refinery simulator games. Maxis (of SimCity, The Sims fame) made SimRefinery way back when. https:/&
393.
by Bjartr 2y ago
The unfortunate truth is that for too many businesses this is equivalent to "stop running your business"
394.
by Bjartr 2y ago
I'd love to learn more about Europe being more reliant on trucks for delivery than the US. Got any references handy?
395.
by Bjartr 2y ago
So safe the effort for the things that actually matter in your life.
396.
by Bjartr 2y ago
I think it's at least in part because you have to meet a whole lot of regulations to make a car street legal. You can start with a simple 3k vehicle, but by time you've made the changes needed to pass all the requirements it'
397.
by Bjartr 2y ago
How so?
398.
by Bjartr 2y ago
What does sales have to do with what you're claiming? Please share the course and or examples of it being done well without requiring that excessive context, so that there's something to support your claim.
399.
by Bjartr 2y ago
> Awkward UX Yep, UX design is all about tradeoffs. So it's important to ask: What is more important to have UX polish? Uninstalling apps, something that happens rarely for most users? Or launching an app, which most users do dozens
400.
by Bjartr 2y ago
> there are plenty of actions that are fundamentally impossible to undo, such as sending an email. That's just a lack of imagination. Gmail and others allow undoing a misclicked send no problem. In cases it doesn't matter to th
401.
by Bjartr 2y ago
Right, it's the people that need the internship to learn/network and need a paycheck that are SoL
402.
by Bjartr 2y ago
I don't see why the mere existence of lower level transport details must preclude discussion of higher level developer ergonomics.
403.
by Bjartr 2y ago
I know there isn't any. The topic is what innovations are possible. One possible innovation is to create such a protocol.
404.
by Bjartr 2y ago
No reason the transmission protocol and the application/ui protocol need to be coupled in their level of abstraction. You could send the same data plus just enough bytes to know which data goes with which stream, then a terminal app co
405.
by Bjartr 2y ago
One assumption is that it's one stream of bytes (Okay, two if you count stderr) and so control and metadata has to be interleaved with content to be displayed
406.
by Bjartr 2y ago
It's like the user agent string in browsers. Using that instead of checking for feature availability directly is always going to end up in a mess like this over time. Heck, there wasn't a Windows 9 because of how much software wou
407.
by Bjartr 2y ago
Same with debugging and error messages. At least it feels that way to me.
408.
by Bjartr 2y ago
That they are delivering useful capability is orthagonal to whether or not they have a moat. They have first-mover advantage, no doubt, but there's very little stopping others from catching up.
409.
by Bjartr 2y ago
That might not even be a hallucination, just incorrect data in its dataset: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9skSE3FJC1U
410.
by Bjartr 2y ago
People do seemingly crazy, risky things for seemingly innane reasons today. Why would ancient humans be different in that regard?
411.
by Bjartr 2y ago
Slapping any mechanic in without thought rarely produces a good game. > If you want to go off the rails and completely ignore the party and plot, you’ll probably be kicked out of the group. Sounds like a great place an AI can fill in as
412.
by Bjartr 2y ago
The criticisms people are laying out about being able to say anything making games boring would apply to D&D as well. Since D&D is really fun despite the freedom to (attempt) to say or do whatever your imagination can dream up means
413.
by Bjartr 2y ago
I read that more as confusion than dismissal tbh.
414.
by Bjartr 2y ago
Neat! Those weren't available last time I looked around. Thanks!
415.
by Bjartr 2y ago
The Deluge was definitely a close runner up. Ultimately the OP-1 won me over on being smaller and having an integrated battery.
416.
by Bjartr 2y ago
The original OP-1 was $600 less than that when I got it for noodling around with music during my commute to work. So yes, if you choose to ignore some criteria, there's plenty of options.
417.
by Bjartr 2y ago
Ask another model if the two statements are in agreement of course! ;)
418.
by Bjartr 2y ago
That's not standalone, that's two pieces.
419.
by Bjartr 2y ago
I would love to know about any other device that ticks the boxes the OP-1 does: * Battery powered * Easily backpack portable * Standalone DAW * Piano layout * Physical knobs and keys * Sequencer * Screen (and accompanying UI) large enough
420.
by Bjartr 2y ago
That's entirely the point.

More ›